Flag, Flagged and Flagging?
Comments
-
@sillav nitram I didn't flag you. As it happens I agree with you about the national anthem. Offending flag removed.1
-
Buy me an apology beer at Bradford and I'll remove it.RedChaser said:
I see mine is still in force, I've told you blackmail for free beer will get you nowhere so give it upElfsborgAddick said:
Can you remove my 35 then please.AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps
.
Anyway what's good enough for the likes of Henners, Fanny and Canters is good enough for me
I was very upset with your insulting comment that prompted the flag.0 -
Haha I stand by it! No make up on I'm a celeb, she looked very average.happyvalley said:
You shouldn't be flagged for that, you should be flogged.Talal said:I got flagged for saying Ola Jordan isn't all that.... by a moderator. But it's my one and only and we've grown close.
0 -
One particular poster has flagged me 4 times yet I have never responded to one of his posts and he has never responded to one of mine.
Weird1 -
go for it..MrLargo said:Never flagged anyone. I didn't even flag people who were critical of Chris Powell's management, even though they are clearly idiots and deserve to be flagged. I'm just too nice, too tolerant and too much of a great bloke to waste my life grassing people up to the moderators.
On the flipside, I've received 4 flags. 3 of them were for the same post, in which I expressed a somewhat critical (but entirely accurate) depiction of the people of Liverpool (this was before that fat bullshitter turned up in our dugout and proved I was right). The other flag was given out in jest, not that I was amused.
I'm not vindictive, but I know who the culprits are, and one day they will have to deal with the consequences of their foolishness.1 -
Eh? It was merely a statement of fact that you weren't attending home gamesElfsborgAddick said:
Buy me an apology beer at Bradford and I'll remove it.RedChaser said:
I see mine is still in force, I've told you blackmail for free beer will get you nowhere so give it upElfsborgAddick said:
Can you remove my 35 then please.AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps .
Anyway what's good enough for the likes of Henners, Fanny and Canters is good enough for me
I was very upset with your insulting comment that prompted the flag.
0 -
Perhaps he once to be your friend!blackpool72 said:One particular poster has flagged me 4 times yet I have never responded to one of his posts and he has never responded to one of mine.
Weird0 -
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps1 -
Can you not take away your moderators title, I have been dying to give you one!AFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps4 -
eek!ElfsborgAddick said:
Can you not take away your moderators title, I have been dying to give you one!AFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps2 - Sponsored links:
-
I'm flattered but you are not my type ElfElfsborgAddick said:
Can you not take away your moderators title, I have been dying to give you one!AFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps
14 -
Filthy beast.ElfsborgAddick said:
Can you not take away your moderators title, I have been dying to give you one!AFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps2 -
A flag, you dirty minded individual.Baldybonce said:
eek!ElfsborgAddick said:
Can you not take away your moderators title, I have been dying to give you one!AFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps1 -
To be honest AFKA I'm not taking it seriously and in truth I don't give a toss if someone flags me.AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps
I think from now on I'll see it as a "Badge of Honour"
But I have decided to become vindictive and vengeful!0 -
Phew, I was expecting a banAFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps 0 -
A ban should go to the person responsible for your sole flag!Covered End said:
Phew, I was expecting a banAFKABartram said:
Another flaw in the system. They are the worstCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps
Mr Covered End, the voice of reason and a balanced arguement.2 -
Still think the flags I received for posting a picture of a cream cracker were a travesty of justice. I'm still sore.0
-
110Red_in_SE8 said:I have 109 flags against me! Not one of them deserved. If admin are offering this service can I request that each one of these flags be reviewed and removed in order to restore my good CL name? Perhaps the trainee moderator could do it. On second thoughts maybe not.......I will probably end up with more flags!
5 -
Sorry, wrong button0
-
I've got 36 and almost all of them issued by vegetarians and vegans5
- Sponsored links:
-
And you wonder why the Mods remove your promotes?Henry Irving said:
Good point, talks the talk, doesn't walk the walkCovered End said:
So why can't you flag a moderator's post you hypocrite !AFKABartram said:No offence intended, but it amazes me how seriously some people take this sort of stuff. people being offended by people marking a flag against them is one of the most popular things out moderators get contacted about.
What is the purpose of the Flag option?
- primarily it is a way of highlighting content that fails the term or conditions of acceptable usage. ie if someone is being racist, or offensive or threatening to the degree they might potentially get themselves or this site in trouble, or OTT in the personal abuse of a fellow member. There is an undetermined line, but I think it is quite clear to most when it has been crossed
- it is a way that if any seriously bad content was added it can be resolved quickly and without the need for a moderator to be online and aware, as they is an auto trigger that if a post gets a certain number of flags, it gets removed from public view
- it's a way that if we are ever unsure about whether to allow a user to remain a member following an 'incident', it's helpful way to see what previous 'form' they may have
- It is not to be used if someone posts something that you strongly disagree
It's not perfect. Its childishly misused when people get in personal spats, and particularly with finger scrolling on phones, it's easy to hit accidentally. but it does serve a form of purpose.
If ever we notice flags that are inappropriate, our mods remove them. But it's not something they actively do (because everyone has better things to do with their time!) and if you've got a rogue or two flag against your name, it means nothIng I can assure you.
We explained usage of it when it was introduced, perhaps we should be doing reminders of that more frequently
Hope that helps
I think they are wonderful and I would willingly sell my house and all it's contents in assisting them in running this site
8 -
cafcdave123 said:
I've got 36 and almost all of them issued by sasanachs
2 -
0
-
I have but 3
1 from PL54 (guffaw)
1 from Smudge for calling Gove a c**t.
1 from ooo..Jaaaay..ooo - I have no idea what for.0 -
@Stig, I know it wasn't you, thanks for removing the injustice.Stig said:@sillav nitram I didn't flag you. As it happens I agree with you about the national anthem. Offending flag removed.
0 -
111i_b_b_o_r_g said:
110Red_in_SE8 said:I have 109 flags against me! Not one of them deserved. If admin are offering this service can I request that each one of these flags be reviewed and removed in order to restore my good CL name? Perhaps the trainee moderator could do it. On second thoughts maybe not.......I will probably end up with more flags!
1 -
It won't be me. I have never flagged anybody or any post.cafcdave123 said:I've got 36 and almost all of them issued by vegetarians and vegans
0 -
Dassler21 gave me my one and only flag for calling dogs highly strung shit machines.
I hate the stinking, money sapping, irritating, garden destroying, substitutes for real friends.1 -
I've got 15, 5 of which were for saying I used to like the old white palace top with the diagonal stripes.-2
-
It's that trigger happy rage of his which makes @Dazzler21 undoubtedly the most disliked mod by far. His jealousy of @i_b_b_o_r_g growing popularity is his other main issue.charltonkeston said:Dassler21 gave me my one and only flag for calling dogs highly strung shit machines.
I hate the stinking, money sapping, irritating, garden destroying, substitutes for real friends.
4
