Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

BBC Salary Controversy

Turns out the boys are getting more than the girls.

The main controversy for me is that not only does Vanessa Feltz get paid but she gets £350k a year... (matches Fiona Bruce, Grimshaw and Simon Mayo)

image
«1345678

Comments

  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    There are more men in the list of highest-paid BBC employees than women. That doesn't mean men get paid more than women in the BBC.
  • Chippycafc
    Chippycafc Posts: 14,142
    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.
  • moutuakilla
    moutuakilla Posts: 7,568
    Chizz said:

    There are more men in the list of highest-paid BBC employees than women. That doesn't mean men get paid more than women in the BBC.

    Not how it is being spun/will be spun by many.
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,952

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Graham Norton is ten times the pesenter Chris Evans is imho.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Regardless of what you personally think of both they pull in very high listening/viewing figures. Surely that's the point?
  • Chippycafc
    Chippycafc Posts: 14,142
    colthe3rd said:

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Regardless of what you personally think of both they pull in very high listening/viewing figures. Surely that's the point?
    Sums up the British viewing/listening public then. Norton isn't even funny.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486

    colthe3rd said:

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Regardless of what you personally think of both they pull in very high listening/viewing figures. Surely that's the point?
    Sums up the British viewing/listening public then. Norton isn't even funny.
    In your opinion.
  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,198
    edited July 2017
    They say on the news tonite that Norton's earnings for his chat show are not included in that figure. (I understand that where fees are paid by a production company they are not included.) So, the ex-friends top gear bloke doesn't feature because he is paid by BBC Worldwide.

    I guess too, that people like Charlie Stayt, the breakfast presenter don't feature because he is a freelance and I guess his management company gets the "fee" for his services.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,849

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Graham Norton is ten times the pesenter Chris Evans is imho.
    The BBC pay Graham Nortons production company to make his chat show. He gets a large wedge from the production company that he owns to present 'their' show. Those figures are not included in his salary.

    But I think he is the best chat show host there is.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Jeremy Vine on £700,000 to £750,000 a year? Wtf

    Would that be for Eggheads, his BBC2 radio show or his unbelievably bias election presenting?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chippycafc
    Chippycafc Posts: 14,142
    cafcfan said:

    They say on the news tonite that Norton's earnings for his chat show are not included in that figure. (I understand that where fees are paid by a production company they are not included.) So, the ex-friends top gear bloke doesn't feature because he is paid by BBC Worldwide.

    I guess too, that people like Charlie Stayt, the breakfast presenter don't feature because he is a freelance and I guess his management company gets the "fee" for his services.

    Crikey Norton earns more...ridiculous
  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,039

    Jeremy Vine on £700,000 to £750,000 a year? Wtf

    Would that be for Eggheads, his BBC2 radio show or his unbelievably bias election presenting?

    This is not for you. It's for licence payers. :-)
  • clb74
    clb74 Posts: 10,824

    Jeremy Vine on £700,000 to £750,000 a year? Wtf

    Would that be for Eggheads, his BBC2 radio show or his unbelievably bias election presenting?

    Thought you might be on here ibborg
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486

    Jeremy Vine on £700,000 to £750,000 a year? Wtf

    Would that be for Eggheads, his BBC2 radio show or his unbelievably bias election presenting?

    Probably knows when to use bias or biased though.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    colthe3rd said:

    Jeremy Vine on £700,000 to £750,000 a year? Wtf

    Would that be for Eggheads, his BBC2 radio show or his unbelievably bias election presenting?

    Probably knows when to use bias or biased though.
    So he fuckin should, working for the Beeb
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,849

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Is that Chris Evans who has the most listened to show on the most listened to radio station in Europe ?
  • Chippycafc
    Chippycafc Posts: 14,142
    MrOneLung said:

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Is that Chris Evans who has the most listened to show on the most listened to radio station in Europe ?
    So what skoda sell more cars than Ferraris does that make them better.
  • AllHailTheHen
    AllHailTheHen Posts: 3,063
    Lineker doing well for a couple of hours presenting per week. No wonder he is so unbearably smug
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948

    Lineker doing well for a couple of hours presenting per week. No wonder he is so unbearably smug

    MOTD is generally watched anyway because folk wanna watch the football, why would they pay that jug eared crisp salesman that amount of dough to do it.

    It ain't like he draws the viewers in is itm in fact i don't think I know anyone who likes him or thinks he does a good job
  • I saw this revealed earlier. Don't really see what all the fuss is about to be honest. Is it really a big deal?

    Also, it's given Piers Morgan another platform to prove what a wanker he is once again on twitter!
  • Sponsored links:



  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,039

    I saw this revealed earlier. Don't really see what all the fuss is about to be honest. Is it really a big deal?

    Also, it's given Piers Morgan another platform to prove what a wanker he is once again on twitter!

    And he's on the living wage isn't he.
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,255
    some of them are on obscene money

    I don't mind Lineker but £1.5 is a lot. It being public money does make you think after all this shit over Grenfell, the terrorist attacks and the 1% public sector pay gap, that it's in poor taste, but it's TV and the entertainment business and its got its own warped rules I guess
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,849

    MrOneLung said:

    How the hell is Chris Evans worth at least 2.2 million a year. Graham Norton 900k. Ridiculous waste of money.

    Is that Chris Evans who has the most listened to show on the most listened to radio station in Europe ?
    So what skoda sell more cars than Ferraris does that make them better.
    That is based on economics.

    In a world of free radio, his is the most popular show in Europe.

    Not saying I personally like him, but can see why he gets paid so much based on those facts.
  • jams
    jams Posts: 1,219
    Just like footballers the market rate is the market rate - yes it's much higher than ordinary jobs but was anyone expecting anything different? Also this isn't just a BBC thing - I'm sure the commercial channels pay much more
  • rananegra
    rananegra Posts: 3,689
    I agree it's an obscene amount of money to pay anybody. But the BBC is competing with the bottomless pockets of Rupert Murdoch and the much higher paying ITV. Was it Murdoch who made it so that the Beeb had to release how much they're paying their talent? Can't see it happening at Sky, can you?
    At least Lineker does some presenting, Alan Shearer gets over £400k for saying the same thing every week for 9 months of the year.
    Mind you, some of these people on this list are on less than Tex was.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Lineker is a decent presenter, but there are many who could do his job just as well. People watch match of the day for the football. A chat show host such as Graham Norton makes or breaks the show.
  • Fiiish
    Fiiish Posts: 7,998
    Same non-story they print every year. Maybe the BBC should spend more money on sourcing new talent rather than relying on people who were household names 20 years ago.
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,255
    Chizz said:
    Charlie Fairhead lost his whole family in a house fire to be fair. I don't begrudge him a penny
  • EastTerrace
    EastTerrace Posts: 3,961
    rananegra said:

    I agree it's an obscene amount of money to pay anybody. But the BBC is competing with the bottomless pockets of Rupert Murdoch and the much higher paying ITV. Was it Murdoch who made it so that the Beeb had to release how much they're paying their talent? Can't see it happening at Sky, can you?
    At least Lineker does some presenting, Alan Shearer gets over £400k for saying the same thing every week for 9 months of the year.
    Mind you, some of these people on this list are on less than Tex was.

    I agree. On first sight it seems ridiculous but comparing it to commercial channels it may not seem as bad.

    So Evans is on £45,000 per week, same as lower scale Prem footballer. Now I am no Chris Evans fan, but I know who brings more value to entertainment and society.

    I am more concerned by the gender pay difference but until you see responsibilities etc. It's difficult to compare. Again though Ita unfortunately probably led by what each presenter can get in the private sector.