I emailed da cloob just before 10am yesterday with a complaint about the seat I purchased for the Swindon game. To date I have not even had an acknowledgement of my compliant. How long is reasonable before I chase this up?
my complaint was as follows:
'Dear Sirs,
Please find attached a scanned copy of the ticket I purchased for Sunday's game against Swindon Town. Please also find attached three photos taken from that seat when sitting down. This seat was not advertised as having a restricted view and neither was it priced differently to the other seats in that block that do not have a restricted view. How can you justify selling this seat without mentioning that it has a restricted view and how can you justify selling it at the same price as the others in that block considering that it does have a restricted view?
Amongst all the other issues currently surrounding the Club and it's gross mismanagement I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that your 'customers' are treated with such distain.
Please can you tell me why this seat isn't sold as having a restricted view and in light of this how you can justify the price charged.
Kind regards'
6
Comments
Forced to sit in the more expensive seats in the adjacent block.
Guess which ones.
The club are well aware of the restricted view.
I expected an acknowledgement within 24 hours with a timescale as to when I would receive a reply to my complaint
no, it was an end of row seat to the right of directors box as looking at pitch, first row of the upper section
Good luck with it all though, hope they get back to you sooner rather then later!
The spelling police at the club told them not to bother replying to your letter.
Silence.
Thank you for your complaint.
As a direct response to your email, we will be looking into serving 3 bonus chips in every portion. New total, 19 chips per portion.
Wank you very much,
The Clooob
I'd give them 72 hours.
I presume your main complaint was having to get all the balloons over the barrier ?
Times change eh!
If a seat has a restricted view it should be sold and priced as such, and if the purchaser then moves to another vacant seat the club can choose to enforce all seat movement in the ground if they so choose. The assumption by the club, which probably matches reality, is that the vast majority sit in the correct seats, and those that don't aren't causing loses to the club greater than the the additional stewarding costs required to ensure everybody is in their allocated seat.
That requires a level of competence that is way boyond our SMT.
Chris Parkes was behind me and arrange for us to sit at the back of the Directors Box. He did also say he was constantly telling the box office not to issue these seats.
It may be that somebody decided to change that policy in the last few years or that the restricted view designations were "lost" from the system when it was upgraded, but I think the reason for the reduced price was a legal one, which is unlikely to have changed. It's likely to be a regular problem if they are not identified on the system (several hundred are affected), but it could just be some of them.
'Ungrateful shit, he should have closed his eyes and not watched the match, make him suffer for that, give him two tickets for another game, that'll teach him not to complain again'