The original legal source info was correct. The same source said last week that what happened was that a serious party which had previously withdrawn had come back to the table and that was why things didn’t get finalised as expected.
Given the hint above (serious party come back to the table) is that second party involved with the Scottish Muir maybe?
Muir or Muir?
I'd hope for some mega rich blokes but that doesn't happen to us...
An SPA is one legal document negotiated by lawyers for the buyer and seller. Obviously two different lawyers for the buyers and one Mischon for Roland.
The original legal source info was correct. The same source said last week that what happened was that a serious party which had previously withdrawn had come back to the table and that was why things didn’t get finalised as expected.
Given the hint above (second serious party come back to the table) is that second party involved with the Scottish Muir maybe?
Muir or Muir?
I'd hope for some mega rich blokes but that doesn't happen to us...
I've been provided with some additional information by another poster on CL who I believe is very clearly ITK but it wasn't one of the usual suspects (Airman, RedHenry or even Doucher!). However, I have promised to keep my mouth shut so out of respect I will not divulge further.
What I will say is that I don't think the bidder has anything to do with either of the two Muir's.
Not ITK at all about anything, least of all this fecking takeover but to clarify my post above I think the legal wording would be:
"Whereas, the party of the first part [RD] has agreed with the party of the second part [the buyer] to sell the asset for the price of [undisclosed]. The party of the second part and the party of the first part hereinafter referred to as the parties shall hereinafter no longer engage with the party of the third part [mysterons] who, being unwilling to pay the sum of [undisclosed] for fourteen chips and a Bovril will be referred to as the party of the second part and that the party of the first part shall hereinafter be referred to as the party of the third part notwithstanding that the party of the second part and the party of the third part be one and the same, hereunto the interested parties shall be known as the parties and that the party of the second part and the party of the first part shall be indistinguishable from the party of the third part.
The original legal source info was correct. The same source said last week that what happened was that a serious party which had previously withdrawn had come back to the table and that was why things didn’t get finalised as expected.
Given the hint above (second serious party come back to the table) is that second party involved with the Scottish Muir maybe?
Muir or Muir?
I'd hope for some mega rich blokes but that doesn't happen to us...
I've been provided with some additional information by another poster on CL who I believe is very clearly ITK but it wasn't one of the usual suspects (Airman, RedHenry or even Doucher!). However, I have promised to keep my mouth shut so out of respect I will not divulge further.
What I will say is that I don't think the bidder has anything to do with either of the two Muir's.
Based on the info you've been given, are you optimistic about our future?
To speculate, one bid might be X up front with the rest on attaining promotion. The other might be more cash but retaining a share of Konsa, Aribo and others per Leige.
The original legal source info was correct. The same source said last week that what happened was that a serious party which had previously withdrawn had come back to the table and that was why things didn’t get finalised as expected.
Given the hint above (second serious party come back to the table) is that second party involved with the Scottish Muir maybe?
Muir or Muir?
I'd hope for some mega rich blokes but that doesn't happen to us...
I've been provided with some additional information by another poster on CL who I believe is very clearly ITK but it wasn't one of the usual suspects (Airman, RedHenry or even Doucher!). However, I have promised to keep my mouth shut so out of respect I will not divulge further.
What I will say is that I don't think the bidder has anything to do with either of the two Muir's.
Based on the info you've been given, are you optimistic about our future?
The original legal source info was correct. The same source said last week that what happened was that a serious party which had previously withdrawn had come back to the table and that was why things didn’t get finalised as expected.
Given the hint above (second serious party come back to the table) is that second party involved with the Scottish Muir maybe?
Muir or Muir?
I'd hope for some mega rich blokes but that doesn't happen to us...
I've been provided with some additional information by another poster on CL who I believe is very clearly ITK but it wasn't one of the usual suspects (Airman, RedHenry or even Doucher!). However, I have promised to keep my mouth shut so out of respect I will not divulge further.
What I will say is that I don't think the bidder has anything to do with either of the two Muir's.
Based on the info you've been given, are you optimistic about our future?
Given the differing interpretations people have arrived at as a result of the latest Richard Murray statement, i.e. are there still 2 potential purchasing parties remaining in the process, or was "parties" simply referring to one bidder and RD (my interpretation)), perhaps @Ollywozere could arrange for some kind of clarification to be issued by the club?
Given the differing interpretations people have arrived at as a result of the latest Richard Murray statement, i.e. are there still 2 potential purchasing parties remaining in the process, or was "parties" simply referring to one bidder and RD (my interpretation)), perhaps @Ollywozere could arrange for some kind of clarification to be issued by the club?
Given the differing interpretations people have arrived at as a result of the latest Richard Murray statement, i.e. are there still 2 potential purchasing parties remaining in the process, or was "parties" simply referring to one bidder and RD (my interpretation)), perhaps @Ollywozere could arrange for some kind of clarification to be issued by the club?
Two purchasing parties remain in the process
Olly speaks!
First time since Meire took her thumb off his head.
Comments
Given the hint above (serious party come back to the table) is that second party involved with the Scottish Muir maybe?
Muir or Muir?
I'd hope for some mega rich blokes but that doesn't happen to us...
As always the Devil is in the detail.
Are they going to be joint owners or something?
#DOME
#Banned
#UserBannedPleaseCarryOn
What I will say is that I don't think the bidder has anything to do with either of the two Muir's.
"Whereas, the party of the first part [RD] has agreed with the party of the second part [the buyer] to sell the asset for the price of [undisclosed]. The party of the second part and the party of the first part hereinafter referred to as the parties shall hereinafter no longer engage with the party of the third part [mysterons] who, being unwilling to pay the sum of [undisclosed] for fourteen chips and a Bovril will be referred to as the party of the second part and that the party of the first part shall hereinafter be referred to as the party of the third part notwithstanding that the party of the second part and the party of the third part be one and the same, hereunto the interested parties shall be known as the parties and that the party of the second part and the party of the first part shall be indistinguishable from the party of the third part.
Whereunto we have this day set our seal."
Hope that makes it clearer.
Tentative gif deployment in 3...2...1...
Roly was spotted at a belgian production of The Producers in January.
Just saying.......
Can't be that hard.
First time since Meire took her thumb off his head.
;-)