Henry I've read that comment but it is waffle. Do they say the ball is back in the ESI court? No. They are prevaricating which is damaging to our chances of competing in this division. Do they give a reason for their failure to make a judgemental? No.
FFS due diligence. When has that been visible in EFL dealings?
At the end of the day they have issued a statement giving no indication why there is a delay.
You moaned they hadn't responded within ten days but they had.
You moaned they hadn't responded to Duchatelet's rant only hours after the event but they responded the same afternoon.
You moaned the statement is waffle as it gives no indication why there is a delay but ESI are saying there is no delay.
What more can the EFL say about a confidential process? ESI are crooks? Duchatelet lied? The numbers don't add up?
They can't comment in any detail and nor should they.
I don't have 100% faith in the EFL, I've met with them, but I have zero faith in the person trying to pin all the blame on them; Roland Duchatelet.
Henry, you copy my post and criticise things I haven't said. EFL shortcomings are not about responses but adjudication, or lack of it. Their statement said nothing about what was holding up the process.
Do you and Covered End enjoy nit-picking my comments? When did either of you actually comment on a match? Are you Addicks or Trolls?
i comment on every match you complete and utter twat.
Do you think that their PR has been a bit, how can I put it, "to good to be true"?
I used the word stink before, I think that was a bit ott now, but something isn't right. It's almost like Southall is saying everything we could possibly want to hear.
I think the PR has been very good, but that’s what it is.
We must be the most least ( is that a thing ?) transparent football club in the country . Why does everything to do with our club have to involve secrets , conjecture and innuendo ?
Cos we used all our luck up in the 3 play off finals / Lennie and Curbs miracle years and the payback is a lifetime of losing to the scum , palace being much better than us and clown ownership of our club forever
The EFL are an absolute embarrassment of an organisation.
Those of you who have been reading the whole thread will remember I said, very tongue-in-cheeek it must be admitted, that it would be confirmed after the transfer window had closed.
What's that they say about many a true word spoken in jest?
The EFL are an absolute embarrassment of an organisation.
Well yes and no Gary. As I indicated earlier, IMHO they are being more and more less inclined to accept on face value the answers to questions they receive. As a fan base we have given as much stick (if not more than) any other club to The EFL in recent times, suggesting that they need to put their house in order.....I think we can hardly complain when they are being seen to do just that very thing and leaving no stone unturned. Boring and frustrating as that may be.
I don't think it's that at all. There's a committee of some old duffers sitting round a table and one of them says
"The final bit of business, Charlton are going to be taken over and become one of the richest clubs in the world"
and the rest look at him in shock and say
"Good God, no, we can't have that sort of thing, what can we do to screw it up?".
We must be the most least ( is that a thing ?) transparent football club in the country . Why does everything to do with our club have to involve secrets , conjecture and innuendo ?
@Bedsaddick yes, it's a thing, as you can be the most of anything including "least transparent" but unnecessary. If we are "the least", that's an absolute and so doesn't need qualifying with "most".
We must be the most least ( is that a thing ?) transparent football club in the country . Why does everything to do with our club have to involve secrets , conjecture and innuendo ?
@Bedsaddick yes, it's a thing, as you can be the most of anything including "least transparent" but unnecessary. If we are "the least", that's an absolute and so doesn't need qualifying with "most".
I am very cynical(Probably sometimes unjustly) of any organisation,funded by other people (presumably the clubs)and dont have to justify their existance.I place the efl alongside,bbc management,nhs management,local counsellors all who pay themselves a fortune out of other peoples pockets,and therefore will drag things along at any opportunity to make themselves look busy.(The genuine people who work for the above mentioned organisations are of course exempt from my views but you know what I mean.)i bring up th ownerships of Blackpool,bury,Leeds,Coventry,Orient and others all which I presume where investigated,Why does no one at efl ask how Derby pay Rooney 80k per week,(How does that fall in with ffp)Sheff wed being looked at for dodgy dealngs,so many things these people should be on top off.how long does it take to find out if the buyer has proof of funds,as soon as the takeover was mentioned,there were loads of posts on this website,quoting how much the buyers were worth,surely they can just look at a bank statement.Thats my rant over,pissing down with rain cant play golf,going back to bed,good luck to the travelling support today,hope you have a good day.
I’ve got a house analogy. How long does it take for solicitors to do the stuff to sell and buy a house ? They are waiting on searches, vendor and buyer details, surveyors reports, mortgage information which all takes time to collect and verify. Then there are questions those things throw up that need answering. All that work, time and effort for a few hundred thousand and all done in one country. How long does that all take ? 4 months perhaps ?
I would think the sale of Charlton to a Middle Easter group from a Belgian company in a third party land would be ten times as difficult. If they can get it done in six weeks I would be impressed.
When you put it in black and white what are the odds of it happening before December 31st or January 31st 10% maybe?
Nothing to see here. We just need to be patient and let the EFL get on with their job. Ignore the rants of the senile old fool. He’ll be gone soon enough.
To which particular senile old fool are you referring. There are so many on here...
Henry I've read that comment but it is waffle. Do they say the ball is back in the ESI court? No. They are prevaricating which is damaging to our chances of competing in this division. Do they give a reason for their failure to make a judgemental? No.
FFS due diligence. When has that been visible in EFL dealings?
At the end of the day they have issued a statement giving no indication why there is a delay.
You moaned they hadn't responded within ten days but they had.
You moaned they hadn't responded to Duchatelet's rant only hours after the event but they responded the same afternoon.
You moaned the statement is waffle as it gives no indication why there is a delay but ESI are saying there is no delay.
What more can the EFL say about a confidential process? ESI are crooks? Duchatelet lied? The numbers don't add up?
They can't comment in any detail and nor should they.
I don't have 100% faith in the EFL, I've met with them, but I have zero faith in the person trying to pin all the blame on them; Roland Duchatelet.
Henry, you copy my post and criticise things I haven't said. EFL shortcomings are not about responses but adjudication, or lack of it. Their statement said nothing about what was holding up the process.
Do you and Covered End enjoy nit-picking my comments? When did either of you actually comment on a match? Are you Addicks or Trolls?
i comment on every match you complete and utter twat.
You do comment on every match and an excellent poster too.
I bought a property which took 32 days from agreeing a price.
Full survey, full searches, loan from building society. No chain and two parties who wanted the deal done.
I’m purchasing a property that’s so far taken 2 months, and the sellers are supposedly real estate gurus, when in fact they don’t know their arse from their elbow.
Henry I've read that comment but it is waffle. Do they say the ball is back in the ESI court? No. They are prevaricating which is damaging to our chances of competing in this division. Do they give a reason for their failure to make a judgemental? No.
FFS due diligence. When has that been visible in EFL dealings?
At the end of the day they have issued a statement giving no indication why there is a delay.
You moaned they hadn't responded within ten days but they had.
You moaned they hadn't responded to Duchatelet's rant only hours after the event but they responded the same afternoon.
You moaned the statement is waffle as it gives no indication why there is a delay but ESI are saying there is no delay.
What more can the EFL say about a confidential process? ESI are crooks? Duchatelet lied? The numbers don't add up?
They can't comment in any detail and nor should they.
I don't have 100% faith in the EFL, I've met with them, but I have zero faith in the person trying to pin all the blame on them; Roland Duchatelet.
Henry, you copy my post and criticise things I haven't said. EFL shortcomings are not about responses but adjudication, or lack of it. Their statement said nothing about what was holding up the process.
Do you and Covered End enjoy nit-picking my comments? When did either of you actually comment on a match? Are you Addicks or Trolls?
i comment on every match you complete and utter twat.
You do comment on every match and an excellent poster too.
But that doesn't matter to Harvey's.
His only tactic when proved wrong is to flatly deny what he's just said, claim "context" or deflect with you're a Tory/remainer/not a real fan.
Henry I've read that comment but it is waffle. Do they say the ball is back in the ESI court? No. They are prevaricating which is damaging to our chances of competing in this division. Do they give a reason for their failure to make a judgemental? No.
FFS due diligence. When has that been visible in EFL dealings?
At the end of the day they have issued a statement giving no indication why there is a delay.
You moaned they hadn't responded within ten days but they had.
You moaned they hadn't responded to Duchatelet's rant only hours after the event but they responded the same afternoon.
You moaned the statement is waffle as it gives no indication why there is a delay but ESI are saying there is no delay.
What more can the EFL say about a confidential process? ESI are crooks? Duchatelet lied? The numbers don't add up?
They can't comment in any detail and nor should they.
I don't have 100% faith in the EFL, I've met with them, but I have zero faith in the person trying to pin all the blame on them; Roland Duchatelet.
Henry, you copy my post and criticise things I haven't said. EFL shortcomings are not about responses but adjudication, or lack of it. Their statement said nothing about what was holding up the process.
Do you and Covered End enjoy nit-picking my comments? When did either of you actually comment on a match? Are you Addicks or Trolls?
i comment on every match you complete and utter twat.
You do comment on every match and an excellent poster too.
But that doesn't matter to Harvey's.
His only tactic when proved wrong is to flatly deny what he's just said, claim "context" or deflect with you're a Tory/remainer/not a real fan.
Henry I've read that comment but it is waffle. Do they say the ball is back in the ESI court? No. They are prevaricating which is damaging to our chances of competing in this division. Do they give a reason for their failure to make a judgemental? No.
FFS due diligence. When has that been visible in EFL dealings?
At the end of the day they have issued a statement giving no indication why there is a delay.
You moaned they hadn't responded within ten days but they had.
You moaned they hadn't responded to Duchatelet's rant only hours after the event but they responded the same afternoon.
You moaned the statement is waffle as it gives no indication why there is a delay but ESI are saying there is no delay.
What more can the EFL say about a confidential process? ESI are crooks? Duchatelet lied? The numbers don't add up?
They can't comment in any detail and nor should they.
I don't have 100% faith in the EFL, I've met with them, but I have zero faith in the person trying to pin all the blame on them; Roland Duchatelet.
Henry, you copy my post and criticise things I haven't said. EFL shortcomings are not about responses but adjudication, or lack of it. Their statement said nothing about what was holding up the process.
Do you and Covered End enjoy nit-picking my comments? When did either of you actually comment on a match? Are you Addicks or Trolls?
i comment on every match you complete and utter twat.
You do comment on every match and an excellent poster too.
But that doesn't matter to Harvey's.
His only tactic when proved wrong is to flatly deny what he's just said, claim "context" or deflect with you're a Tory/remainer/not a real fan.
The EFL responded to Duchatelet's statement, saying it hoped to conclude the matter "within an appropriate and reasonable timeframe".
"The EFL has worked with the club, the current ownership and prospective new owners to ensure any change of control is achieved as quickly as is practically possible," a statement added.
"These situations never follow a set format, are unique in nature and the EFL is reliant on the quality of information supplied as part of any submissions.
"The League is committed to applying its regulations and ensuring the appropriate levels of due diligence are undertaken on any individuals wishing to become involved at the club.
Comments
What's that they say about many a true word spoken in jest?
"The final bit of business, Charlton are going to be taken over and become one of the richest clubs in the world"
and the rest look at him in shock and say
"Good God, no, we can't have that sort of thing, what can we do to screw it up?".
I'll start with a coffee
His only tactic when proved wrong is to flatly deny what he's just said, claim "context" or deflect with you're a Tory/remainer/not a real fan.
Sealioning of the worst type