Oh dear. Would guess that its highly likely to be the same consortium (IMO). What happens next if it is is really depressing...
Possibly, but the article describes them as "three unnamed businessmen",
But from what has been said by a number of sources about 'our' Aussies - that the structure of their consortium is 'complicated' (including that it's now 'Aussies plus others') - strongly suggests that there are somewhat more than 'three businessmen' involved?
However, it's possible that these three Notts County Aussies are people previously involved with the CAFC Aussie 'consortium'?
Can't be our Aussies then. At least two of them have names.
Oh dear. Would guess that its highly likely to be the same consortium (IMO). What happens next if it is is really depressing...
Possibly, but the article describes them as "three unnamed businessmen",
But from what has been said by a number of sources about 'our' Aussies - that the structure of their consortium is 'complicated' (including that it's now 'Aussies plus others') - strongly suggests that there are somewhat more than 'three businessmen' involved?
However, it's possible that these three Notts County Aussies are people previously involved with the CAFC Aussie 'consortium'?
quite possibly and they would be paying a lot less so don't need so many in their consortium I'd guess
IF it was the same Aussies that have been trying to buy us for 15 months (or whatever) then quite frankly I'd be glad if they've gone, as something has to give.
I'm still convinced that the Aussies agreed Roland's price a year ago, and it's this which has "priced out" other buyers. No way will Roland have allowed their bid to drag on for so long, unless they were the ones prepared to pay his price
IF it was the same Aussies that have been trying to buy us for 15 months (or whatever) then quite frankly I'd be glad if they've gone, as something has to give.
I'm still convinced that the Aussies agreed Roland's price a year ago, and it's this which has "priced out" other buyers. No way will Roland have allowed their bid to drag on for so long, unless they were the ones prepared to pay his price
Agreed. If the Aussies can’t or won’t get the deal over the line, clear off out of the way. Then Duchatelet might get real with the price tag.
So if I understand this correctly, Roland Duchatelet is waiting for us to get promotion to get the highest figure mentioned (won't happen)
The consortium are waiting for Cafc to drop into League 2 where they can get us for 18 million and where the top wage is £1500 a week and yet the crowd will be 12 to 13k because of the rising of the phoenix from the ashes senario and where the 5 year plan is to reach the Championship. (Won't happen)
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If the Aussies were the ONLY people to accept Roland's price, then yes it's them that have kept the price high.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
Sitting on a beach in Goa is the best way to take all the crap going on. Waiter......a large Campari and Lemonade please, just put it on the bill....”I fank yew.”
Unmasked ... @SoundAsa£ is really Lorraine Chase .... Campari and Lemonade .... WTF is that all about
Sitting here with the cooling sea breeze and a C&L with a slice of orange.....thinking of you all! Luv.....SoundAs.
Sitting on a beach in Goa is the best way to take all the crap going on. Waiter......a large Campari and Lemonade please, just put it on the bill....”I fank yew.”
Unmasked ... @SoundAsa£ is really Lorraine Chase .... Campari and Lemonade .... WTF is that all about
Sitting here with the cooling sea breeze and a C&L with a slice of orange.....thinking of you all! Luv.....SoundAs.
You are obviously bored and can’t wait returning to Blighty
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If the Aussies were the ONLY people to accept Roland's price, then yes it's them that have kept the price high.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
So, to clarify, you're actually saying that it's the buyer that has caused the price to be too high? And not the seller?
Sitting on a beach in Goa is the best way to take all the crap going on. Waiter......a large Campari and Lemonade please, just put it on the bill....”I fank yew.”
Unmasked ... @SoundAsa£ is really Lorraine Chase .... Campari and Lemonade .... WTF is that all about
Yeah! Lemonade in Campari ffs sacrilegious tasteless buffoon The democratisation of fine quality comestibles is not a good thing. Ability to purchase is not the same as suitable. As if a clueless crackpot would buy a football club cos he has the cash but not the first fuckin idea or interest in how to run it 🙀😡🍷
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If the Aussies were the ONLY people to accept Roland's price, then yes it's them that have kept the price high.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
So, to clarify, you're actually saying that it's the buyer that has caused the price to be too high? And not the seller?
Perhaps both parties have to carry some of the blame?
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If the Aussies were the ONLY people to accept Roland's price, then yes it's them that have kept the price high.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
So, to clarify, you're actually saying that it's the buyer that has caused the price to be too high? And not the seller?
I think what is meant is because the 'buyer' has agreed a high price (but never actually followed through), the 'seller' believes that that is the fair price and can see no reason to lower it for anyone else.
Indirectly the 'buyer' has prevented the price from being dropped - but only because the 'seller' is so deluded that he cannot see that this seller is unlikely to ever complete and is too proud to walk away
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If the Aussies were the ONLY people to accept Roland's price, then yes it's them that have kept the price high.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
So, to clarify, you're actually saying that it's the buyer that has caused the price to be too high? And not the seller?
I think what is meant is because the 'buyer' has agreed a high price (but never actually followed through), the 'seller' believes that that is the fair price and can see no reason to lower it for anyone else.
Indirectly the 'buyer' has prevented the price from being dropped - but only because the 'seller' is so deluded that he cannot see that this seller is unlikely to ever complete and is too proud to walk away
Not sure the ‘buyers’ are responsible really.
Imagine you’re selling your house (sorry) and someone comes in and says, ‘that sounds fine, but I’ll check with the people buying the house with me’. They then come back to you and say, ‘sorry, my co-buyers say “no” because the price is too high’. You’d have to be nuts to think you’ve got a buyer at the high price. You haven’t.
So the message seems to be that the Aussies should clear off, in order to make Roland drop his price and find another buyer?
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If the Aussies were the ONLY people to accept Roland's price, then yes it's them that have kept the price high.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
So, to clarify, you're actually saying that it's the buyer that has caused the price to be too high? And not the seller?
I think what is meant is because the 'buyer' has agreed a high price (but never actually followed through), the 'seller' believes that that is the fair price and can see no reason to lower it for anyone else.
Indirectly the 'buyer' has prevented the price from being dropped - but only because the 'seller' is so deluded that he cannot see that this seller is unlikely to ever complete and is too proud to walk away
A lot of people are saying that, but we don’t know for a fact that it’s true.
But imagine you’re selling your house (sorry) and someone comes in and says, ‘that sounds fine, but I’ll check with the people buying the house with me’. They then come back to you and say, ‘sorry, my co-buyers say “no” because the price is too high’. You’d have to be nuts to think you’ve got a buyer at the high price. You haven’t.
I think we are agreeing - I believe Roland has only listened to the bolded part and is sticking to the memory that someone agreed the price, so eventually they will pay
Comments
I'm still convinced that the Aussies agreed Roland's price a year ago, and it's this which has "priced out" other buyers. No way will Roland have allowed their bid to drag on for so long, unless they were the ones prepared to pay his price
The consortium are waiting for Cafc to drop into League 2 where they can get us for 18 million and where the top wage is £1500 a week and yet the crowd will be 12 to 13k because of the rising of the phoenix from the ashes senario and where the 5 year plan is to reach the Championship.
(Won't happen)
Impassé.
In other words, it's the Aussies' fault that the price is too high and if only they would disappear then the price would go down so the club can be sold to someone else.
Not sure that logic stacks up, to be honest.
If ALL potential owners told Roland they would only pay say £25m, then Roland would have to drop the price below what he's asking. If one group seem happy to pay £40m then to him that's justification that his price is fair.
Luv.....SoundAs.
As if a clueless crackpot would buy a football club cos he has the cash but not the first fuckin idea or interest in how to run it 🙀😡🍷
Indirectly the 'buyer' has prevented the price from being dropped - but only because the 'seller' is so deluded that he cannot see that this seller is unlikely to ever complete and is too proud to walk away
Imagine you’re selling your house (sorry) and someone comes in and says, ‘that sounds fine, but I’ll check with the people buying the house with me’.
They then come back to you and say, ‘sorry, my co-buyers say “no” because the price is too high’.
You’d have to be nuts to think you’ve got a buyer at the high price. You haven’t.