JFC and Bauer combine, to JDS, to Watt, back to Baldock, to JDS who can't beat his man. Throw to us. JDS is the stand out guy.
Bauer to JFC, to Byrne, crosses, Baldock clears to JDS, to Ricky, turns his man, plays it straight to the keeper. That's just what they wanted you to do Ricky.
Just think about the amount of times we've thought we'd hit rock bottom. Think about it. And know this - we haven't yet. All the pain from the moment Curbs left, we are STILL on the way down.
Hats off to the woman I'm sat next to in f block of east stand. She's non stop encouraged the team. But to be fair, she's of an age (and probably the only person) that can remember us finishing lower than our current position.
What's the vol au vent queen doing that side of the ground .
We're trying to figure out if we display a Medical ID number, a Medicaid beneficiary number, or both. It takes up a lot of space in the design and there's the question of, "will anyone actually reference this?" I mean they will, but how often for all this real estate? And I'm sat here trying to find a nice way to interject that we have different shades of like white and grey between the different records and that sucks.
I should say these are wireframes not mock-ups. So the color scheme will probably be different. And by and large our user design and research people are really good. It's just we're going through some real banal minutia. Like "this %complete circle, what does it mean when it's green?" It means it's done.
Let me know if you'd like more minute-by-minute reporting of my meeting.
Holmes wins the ball, is pulled down, JDS picks it up and gets it to Pearce, to Byrne upfield, switch to Holmes, looks to take on his man, poor cross and that's that.
We're trying to figure out if we display a Medical ID number, a Medicaid beneficiary number, or both. It takes up a lot of space in the design and there's the question of, "will anyone actually reference this?" I mean they will, but how often for all this real estate? And I'm sat here trying to find a nice way to interject that we have different shades of like white and grey between the different records and that sucks.
I should say these are wireframes not mock-ups. So the color scheme will probably be different. And by and large our user design and research people are really good. It's just we're going through some real banal minutia. Like "this %complete circle, what does it mean when it's green?" It means it's done.
Let me know if you'd like more minute-by-minute reporting of my meeting.
Just think about the amount of times we've thought we'd hit rock bottom. Think about it. And know this - we haven't yet. All the pain from the moment Curbs left, we are STILL on the way down.
The last three years have been utterly needless though.
Roland and his flunkies have got nothing right in that time. Every decision of any scale, they have got wrong.
I genuinely didn't believe there was worse management material out there than Karel Fraeye. But there was. And we can boast they both managed us in the same year.
I genuinely didn't believe there was worse management material out there than Karel Fraeye. But there was. And we can boast they both managed us in the same year.
I think they're both equally worthless.
Without meaning to sound like Tony Mowbray, we shouldn't be appointing hacks of the calibre that Roland has brought to this club over the last three years
Joe lovely ball to Holmes, beats his man into the box, to JDS, to Byrne, to JDS... takes on Reeves, crosses, Josh can't reach it, Lewington clears. Barnes keeps it in, Bauer tackles, he comes forward to Botaka, out to Solly, back to Bauer. Da Silva out left, to Holmes, cuts inside, back to Pearce. Out to JFC, to JDS on the run, Downing cuts off his options which sounds extremely painful.
I don't dislike Robinson much. I don't think anyone would have made a success of our club. And I don't usually say sacking the manager can do much good, stick with the guy who built the team and so on. But right now, I think the only way we are going to win another game is if they sack him and put Jason in charge for a few games.
Joe to Solly on halfway, down the line to Botaka, they win it back, OKeefe, to Upson, ight to Reeves, no Upson shoots, deflected off Bauer, Rudd does well to recover and save for a corner.
For our system you need to enter a certain amount of information about a patient. Right now we're discussing what happens when you don't enter or have all of the information. How does that display in a list? And how can we sort that via a drop down? Should we color code done versus not done?
I'm taking a very snarky approach to this meeting, because it's a bit cyclical. But what we do is actually pretty cool (this is a relative term). We're creating something where hospitals and doctor's offices go in and upload a bunch of patient data. They are then given a score rating based on various criteria, but it surrounds the outcomes of their patients. And that score can generate how much they're reimbursed for their services. This is part of a larger attempt to move from quantity-of-service payment in US healthcare to quality-of service payments.
Comments
JFC and Bauer combine, to JDS, to Watt, back to Baldock, to JDS who can't beat his man. Throw to us. JDS is the stand out guy.
Bauer to JFC, to Byrne, crosses, Baldock clears to JDS, to Ricky, turns his man, plays it straight to the keeper. That's just what they wanted you to do Ricky.
I should say these are wireframes not mock-ups. So the color scheme will probably be different. And by and large our user design and research people are really good. It's just we're going through some real banal minutia. Like "this %complete circle, what does it mean when it's green?" It means it's done.
Let me know if you'd like more minute-by-minute reporting of my meeting.
Holmes wins the ball, is pulled down, JDS picks it up and gets it to Pearce, to Byrne upfield, switch to Holmes, looks to take on his man, poor cross and that's that.
Roland and his flunkies have got nothing right in that time. Every decision of any scale, they have got wrong.
Without meaning to sound like Tony Mowbray, we shouldn't be appointing hacks of the calibre that Roland has brought to this club over the last three years
I'm taking a very snarky approach to this meeting, because it's a bit cyclical. But what we do is actually pretty cool (this is a relative term). We're creating something where hospitals and doctor's offices go in and upload a bunch of patient data. They are then given a score rating based on various criteria, but it surrounds the outcomes of their patients. And that score can generate how much they're reimbursed for their services. This is part of a larger attempt to move from quantity-of-service payment in US healthcare to quality-of service payments.