It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Norman_Smith said: simonmatthews said:Statistically as follows - the number after the name indicates the points per season we'd have had if any of them had lasted for 46 league games:Riga Pt 1 - 69Slade and Nugent - 65.4Peeters - 57Luzon - 52.8Riga Pt 2 - 46Robinson (so far) - 43.1Fraeye - 35.4Fraeye is easily the worst, though Robinson is now running him a close second.But: Dowie (30.7) and Reed (26.3) outstrip them all, if that's any consolation. Has Robinson gone below Fraeye now?
simonmatthews said:Statistically as follows - the number after the name indicates the points per season we'd have had if any of them had lasted for 46 league games:Riga Pt 1 - 69Slade and Nugent - 65.4Peeters - 57Luzon - 52.8Riga Pt 2 - 46Robinson (so far) - 43.1Fraeye - 35.4Fraeye is easily the worst, though Robinson is now running him a close second.But: Dowie (30.7) and Reed (26.3) outstrip them all, if that's any consolation.
Statistically as follows - the number after the name indicates the points per season we'd have had if any of them had lasted for 46 league games:Riga Pt 1 - 69Slade and Nugent - 65.4Peeters - 57Luzon - 52.8Riga Pt 2 - 46Robinson (so far) - 43.1Fraeye - 35.4Fraeye is easily the worst, though Robinson is now running him a close second.But: Dowie (30.7) and Reed (26.3) outstrip them all, if that's any consolation.
NorthheathAddick said:I don't even think he could manage a fart properly either...
I don't even think he could manage a fart properly either...
Comments
(Coooooeeeee!)