Having seen it. Red is harsh. He slides along the ground and takes the ball and slightly brushes the player. To be fair to the ref his view is blocked by the Oxford player. Camera angle from east stand is better. Why a video ref could help. Karl right to have a go at appealing as it has a chance. The only reason why fans say it's a red is because they are bitter and twisted over a bad result and bad performance. If we had won with a good result and good performance these same people would have had a different opinion. Just cheap scapegoating. Even worse to a player who by and large has been fantastic for us.
5
Comments
Had that tug back not happened then yes it is a Red Card as it was wild from Chris.
You went off on one about the Byrne sending off too. Just face it, some times Charlton red card are valid, sometimes they're not.
Having not seen the replay, I think it was a yellow. I don't think he went in particularly hard, it was for sure a wreckless challenge.
The more I see of how the team is set up by Robinson, the more I come to think he is a chancer who has blagged his way this far in football.
By the way,why are we collecting a load of red cards under Robinson---does he view them in the same way as parking tickets,an inconvenience of everyday life?
2016/17 (Currently) - 6 | 2015-16 - 6 | 2014/15 - 2 | 2013/14 - 3
2012/13 - 2 | 2011/12 - 5 | 2010/11 - 8 | 2009/10 - 3
2008/09 - 3 | 2007/08 - 6 | 2006/07 - 4 | 2005/06 - 3
2004/05 - 3 | 2003/04 - 3 | 2002/03 - 2 | 2001/02 - 3 | 2000/01 - 3
Good luck with the appeal Karl
And no, I am not bitter because of the result
You can gauge whether it was violent conduct, excessive force, preventing a goalscoring opportunity etc.
This one has to be deemed excessive force, and going in high and late certainly ticks some of the boxes. Intent may have been to rough the guy up out of frustration, but can't be the reason he's sent off.