Tom Rubashow is starting work at the club next week in something loosely called communications.
Good luck Tom, I hope you are happy here, are properly paid, work civilised hours and are able to approach the job with integrity.
However, is the job about writing the programme?
Is the job about communicating factual stuff?
Is the job about communicating with sponsors rather than the general fan base?
I get that the job is to show the club in a good light, and to select those good bits, and hurry past the bad bits, that is right and proper, mind you it is important not to mislead about the bad bits (I am thinking stuff like Fraeye was the 'mastermind' behind Riga) because stuff like that undermines the general credibility of communications.
Will a communications person be allowed to show initiative and have autonomy, or will they simply follow tightly drawn instructions?
I am aware that Mel Baroni only lasted 48 days, some 75 days after the start of her appointment was announced by Katrien Meire at that November power point meeting.
I am pretty sure that Tom Rubashow is aware that a lot of club output is not taken at face value by a lot of people.
My final question is, are 'communications' and 'propaganda' the same thing, or is there a difference?
3
Comments
Propaganda would be things like telling customers how wonderful our owner and CEO are an d all the great things they have done for the cloob.
He's there to try and convince the national media that Charlton isn't a total cake and arse party. Good luck with that.
He is fecked if like me he doesn't know how to use apostrophes properly.
Incidentally there will be another new appointment too, commercial or tickets or something like that, I hope they have a good relationship with Royal Mail.
Mel Baroni had no problem accepting connections ... even Daisy has done so.
I'll get my coat...