Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Oxford v Charlton

Your marks please:

Rudd:
Solly:
Fox:
Bauer:
Lennon:
Lookman:
Foley:
Crofts:
Ulvestad:
Jackson:
Magennis:
Holmes:

Novak: n/a
Botaka: n/a
«1

Comments

  • Your marks please:

    Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6 looks half the player he once was
    Fox: 6 average
    Bauer: 6
    Lennon: 5 why it put konsa or tex back in
    Lookman: 6 subbed off genius Slade
    Foley:5
    Crofts: 4 pooo
    ulvstead 4 useless
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis: 5.5 isolated
    Holmes 6

    Slade 1 negative twat. If that's the midfield you were after your a twat.
  • edited September 2016
    On the supporters coach back..

    Rudd: 7.5 made one fantastic save in the first half and thought he done well today, would've kept a clean sheet but for a quick counter attack
    Solly: 6.5 got forward well at times when he had no one in front of him. Didn't really do a lot wrong but not as spectacular as he has been in the past
    Fox: 6 done okay, made a couple of great challenges but also gave away needless free kicks to put us under pressure a little
    Bauer: 7 one surging run forward in the second half where he was our furthest man forward, said a lot about the support for Magennis
    Lennon: 7 got sent off late where he stretched after trying to control the ball. Some good tackles and done well for his first game back
    Lookman: 6.5 not as effective as you'd expect but was the only creative player we had until he came off for Holmes. Took the free kick that won us the penalty
    Foley: 6 seemed to be the closest midfielder to Magennis at times, keeps the ball moving but doesn't really add much to us that others don't already
    Crofts: 6.5 much better second half where he picked up the ball better. Late on he should've kept it under control and passed but we hoofed up to Magennis too often
    Ulvestad: 6.5 again better second half, tries to support Solly as well as get forward, seems to me he's still figuring out his role in the side
    Jackson: 7 scored the penalty and really worked hard. He's not a winger and we look better when he's in the middle
    Magennis: 7 people will likely mark him down today, but he was starved of support but still battled and almost scored
    Holmes: 7 would've brang him on for Foley and keep Lookman on a little longer. Ran at them a lot and first thing he done was win a corner after a good run. Important player to us

    Novak: n/a
    Botaka: n/a

    Overall, must start turning these draws into wins as soon as otherwise we are doing nothing this season. Need more support up front and far too often we have to hold up play and wait for our other players to catch up.
  • Rudd: 7 fine - couldn't see if could have done better with the goal from angle we were at, made one great instinct save early on the game and was generally solid.
    Solly: 7 played well - good game - tried to link the play well.
    Fox: 6 struggled a bit at times but tried to push on, put one great early cross in
    Bauer: 7 - was a 9 at times but a bit too cavalier and gave the ball away a few times leading to chances. Not helped by lack of movement in front of him.
    Lennon: 6 defended well but two clear bookings - can't complain.
    Lookman: 6.5 lively but tried a little too hard when it wasn't working. Always showed for the ball.
    Foley: 4 - just got in the way most of the time. Not a CM and certainly not a CM in a 5 man midfield with little Crofts, Ulvestad and Jackson.
    Crofts: 6 - did okay. Broke up play well but got a nosebleed whenever he was in the final third.
    Ulvestad: 7 -- like this kid. Looks forward, finds space, good range of passing, will stick a tackle in / track back when he had to. Needs to develop the confidence to shoot.
    Jackson: 7.5 - good game, worked hard but not a LM. Need him in the middle.
    Magennis: 6.5 - wasted for 75 min with long balls and no hope - isolated up front on his own. Worked hard enough but understandably frustrated with tactics and slow CM support. Great header in last 5 min tipped onto the bar.
    Holmes: 7 tried hard. Tricky as ever. Consistently good delivery.

    Novak: n/a - not sure he's fit, tried hard, and did better with McGennis when they could link up
    Botaka: n/a - little time to impress. Appears lazy at chasing down balls closee to him, but gut busting track back to stop a counter attack. Confusing.

    Slade - 5 tactics suspect again. Don't know why he won't play Jackson in the middle, and playing long ball to a lone striker with a defense sitting deep was never going to work (but hey let's keep doing it for 80 min).


  • Rudd: 7.5
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 4
    Bauer: 6
    Lennon: 6
    Lookman - 6
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulvestad - 5.5
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis- 8 MOM
    Holmes: 7
  • Rudd: 8
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 8
    Lennon: 6.5
    Lookman 6
    Foley: 6
    Crofts: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 7
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis: 6.5
    Holmes : 7
  • edited September 2016
    Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 5.5
    Bauer: 6.5
    Lennon: 5
    Lookman: 5.5
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 6
    Ulvestad: 5.5
    Jackson: 5.5
    Magennis: 6.5
    Holmes: 7.5
  • Rudd: 7
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 7
    Lennon: 6
    Lookman: 7
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 6
    Ulvestad: 6
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis:7
    Holmes: 7
  • Your marks please:

    Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 7
    Lennon: 5
    Lookman: 6
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulvestad: 5
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis:7.5
    Holmes: 8

  • Nicholas said:

    Your marks please:

    Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6 looks half the player he once was
    ...

    That's a bit harsh, I know he's short, but really!
  • Rudd: 6.5
    Solly: 6.5
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 7.5
    Lennon: 6
    Lookman: 6
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 7
    Ulvestad: 6
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis: 6
    Holmes: 7.5
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rudd 8
    solly 6
    Fox 6
    Bauer 8 Imperious at back too good for this level
    Lennon 6
    Lundestrat 7
    Foley 5
    Crofts 5 feck me where do they drag this two up from?
    Jackie 6
    Look man 7
    Magennis 7 no support


  • Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 7
    Lennon:5.5
    Lookman: 6
    Foley: 6
    Crofts: 6
    Ulvesetd: 7
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis: 6.5
    Holmes: 6.5

    Novak: n/a
    Botaka: n/a

  • Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6.5
    Fox: 6.5
    Bauer: 7.5
    Lennon: 6
    Lookman: 6.5
    Foley: 5.5
    Crofts: 4.5
    Ulvestad: 5.5
    Jackson: 6.5
    Magennis: 7
    Holmes: 6.5
  • Rudd - 6
    Solly - 6
    Fox - 6
    Bauer - 6.5
    Lennon - 4 (idiot)
    Lookman - 6
    Foley - 5
    Crofts - 4.5
    Ulvestad - 6.5
    Jackson - 5
    Magennis - 6
    Holmes - 6
  • Rudd 7
    Solly 6
    Fox 6
    Bauer 8
    Lennon 6
    Lookman 6.5
    Foley 6.5
    Crofts 6.5
    Ulvestad 6.5
    Jackson 6
    Magennis 6.5
    Holmes 6.5
  • Rudd: 8
    Solly: 6.5
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 7
    Lennon: 6
    Lookman: 6
    Foley: 6
    Crofts: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 6.5
    Jackson: 5.5
    Magennis: 6.5
    Holmes: 7
  • Rudd 7
    Solly 6
    Fox 6
    Bauer 8
    Lennon 6
    Lookman 6.5
    Foley 6
    Crofts 6
    Ulvestad 6.5
    Jackson 6
    Magennis 6.5
    Holmes 7

  • Rudd 7
    Solly 6
    Fox 6
    Bauer 7.5
    Lennon 6
    Lookman 6
    Foley 6
    Crofts 6
    Ulvestad 7
    Jackson 6
    Magennis 7.5
    Holmes 6.5
  • Rudd: 7
    Solly: 5.5
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 6.5
    Lennon: 5.5
    Lookman: 6.5
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulvestad: 7
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis: 7
    Holmes: 7
  • Rudd: 7
    Solly: 5
    Fox: 5.5
    Bauer: 7
    Lennon: 6
    Lookman: 5.5
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 5.5
    Ulvestad: 6.5
    Jackson: 5.5
    Magennis: 7
    Holmes: 7
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rudd - 7
    Solly - 5.5
    Fox - 6
    Bauer - 6
    Lennon - 5
    Lookman - 6
    Foley - 4
    Crofts - 5
    Ulvestad - 7
    Jackson - 6
    Magennis -6
    Holmes - 7
  • Rudd: 8
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 7
    Bauer: 8
    Lennon: 5
    Lookman 5
    Foley: 6
    Crofts: 6
    Ulvestad: 7
    Jackson: 6
    Magennis: 8
    Holmes : 7



  • Rudd: 7
    Solly: 6.5
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 8
    Lennon:6.5
    Lookman: 7
    Foley:5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulvestad:5.5
    Jackson:6
    Magennis:7
    Holmes: 7

    Novak: n/a
    Botaka: n/a

  • Rudd: 7
    Solly: 5
    Fox: 4.5
    Bauer: 6
    Lennon: 5.5
    Lookman: 7
    Foley: 4.5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulvestad: 5
    Jackson: 5.5
    Magennis: 5.5
    Holmes: 7
  • Rudd: 7.5 Match saving save in the 4th minute. Capable otherwise. My MOM for that save.

    Solly: 6 Not vintage Solly by any means but adequate.

    Fox: 6.5 Solid enough. Not sure whether the Oxford goal started with his man getting away but as he was forward he had a right to expect cover.

    Bauer: 6.5 Reasonably untroubled and sauntered forward to reasonable effect on a few occasions.

    Lennon: 6 Loses half a mark for that stupid second booking. Got back to bail Lookman out in the first half on one occasion.

    Lookman: 6.5 Offered a threat and one good shot but tried to do too much on his own at times and lost the ball once dangerously.

    Foley: 6 Made himself available for the pass but little more than that.

    Crofts: 6 Some good tackles in key areas but little or nothing to offer going forward.

    Ulvestad: 7 This bloke is growing on me. Our most effective midfielder. Not that that says much!

    Jackson: 6 Not one of his best games generally but stuck to his task and converted the penalty

    Magennis: 7 The biggest compliment I can give him is that not only does he look like Bartlett but yesterday he was as effective as him, albeit at the lower level, in a 4-5-1.

    Holmes: 7.5 Can only assume not fully fit as he made a tremendous difference when he came on and may have assisted in a win but for a good save by Eastwood from Josh's header.
  • edited September 2016
    Rudd: 6 As usual, little to do except pick the ball out of the net. He did make one very good save first half.
    Solly: 6 Ok, but not a shadow of the player he was. It can't be ability, so is he not as committed ?
    Fox: 5 Ok, but he was way behind the goalscorer, Fox was most culpable and is sooo slooooooow.
    Bauer: 7 Very good game & even went on attacking runs twice, due to having no creativity in centre mid.
    Lennon: 6 Decent game, 2 unnecessary yellows.
    Lookman: 6.5 Showed sparks, but doesn't produce when he starts.
    Foley: 6 Decent game.
    Crofts: 6 Decent game.
    Ulvestad: 6.5 Better than Crofts & Foley, but isn't looking like the answer to lack of creativity.
    Jackson: 6 Decent game.
    Magennis: 7 Worked tirelessly with little support.
    Holmes: 7 Our best player when he came on, as he always is.
  • Rudd - 7
    Solly - 5.5
    Fox - 6
    Bauer - 6
    Lennon - 5
    Lookman - 6
    Foley - 4
    Crofts - 5
    Ulvestad - 7
    Jackson - 6
    Magennis -6
    Holmes - 7

    Protesters-10
  • Rudd: 7 - an excellent reflex save early on and reassuring throughout
    Solly: 6 - ok
    Fox: 6 - ditto. Got in his customary early, crunching tackle (aka a "reducer" in Big Ron parlance)
    Bauer: 7 - defended well and got forward to good effect on a couple of occasions (although the fact that he broke forward and was our most advanced player when a Magennis cross was cut out speaks volumes about our one-paced, static and unbalanced midfield)
    Lennon: 6.5: did well generally but a very reckless tackle for the sending off
    Lookman: 6.5: perhaps tried to do too much on occasions but, prior to Holmes' arrival, he was the one player running at Oxford's defence. We need to get the ball to him further up the field where he can hurt the opposition, rather than picking it up very deep
    Foley: 5 - a hard working player and always available for the ball but he is a square peg in a round hole. Not his fault that Slade asked him to get forward and support Maggenis. Foley seems a good, honest pro but he simply hasn't got what is required in his locker
    Crofts: 5 - largely outmanoeuvred by the Oxford midfielders and offered little offensively
    Ulvestad: 6 - a few nice touches and at least tried to run with the ball on a couple of occasions
    Jackson: 5 - out of position and largely anonymous
    Magennis: 6.5 - worked hard in an utterly thankless role and was crying out for some support
    Holmes: 7.5 - MoM: made a big difference when he came on and put in an exquisite cross for Magennis' late chance
  • Rudd: 7.5 MOM
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Bauer: 6.5
    Lennon: 5
    Lookman: 6
    Foley: 5
    Crofts: 6 good cover for Crofts in that midfield "Matt Holland" role but totally ineffective yesterday with the ball
    Ulvestad: 6.5 the best I've seen him play
    Jackson: 6 (extra mark for the penalty and celebration)
    Magennis: 6.5
    Holmes: 6.5

  • Rudd: 7.5. A good safe keeper. Great early save.
    Solly: 6. Not one of his better games.
    Fox: 6. Couple of tackles but slow, personally would love to see someone quicker who could offer something when attacking.
    Bauer: 8. Best player on the pitch. So much stronger than Pearce and konsa. Couple of times our most attacking player.
    Lennon: 6.5. I thought he had a good game, but another couple of silly bookable fouls.
    Lookman: 6. Didn't think he was that good. Way too deep. Looked tired.
    Foley: 5. A few dodgy passes.
    Crofts: 6. Prefer him to foley and jacko.
    Ulvestad: 7. Best out of the midfield bunch.
    Jackson: 5.5. Apart from penalty game passed him by.
    Magennis: 6.5. I'm a fan and he had no support at all( no surprise when you have no pace in midfield). Felt he did get out muscled a bit and control not as good as previous games.
    Holmes: 7.5. We need him to play every single game or we are going nowhere. Consistently good.

    Novak: n/a
    Botaka: n/a
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!