Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Squad numbers 16/17

13

Comments

  • Surprised Fox didn't want 3. Hopefully no9 will be a new striker
  • Surely means another left back and forward coming in
  • robroy said:

    Surely means another left back and forward coming in

    Let's hope so
  • Ross said:

    A squad of 24, of which 4 are out injured for the foreseeable future, and one (Tex) is expected to be sold!

    Has a bit of a Posh spice look to it at present
  • Kashi will get 3 when he's back. Indicates we are after another striker, and looks like Lookman is staying if he's got 7
  • I would stick them at as the main post but my phone won't allow me to edit.
  • Interesting that Kennedy, Umerah, Thomas and RCC all had squad numbers last season but don't have one this season.

    I was expecting at least Hanlan and Umerah to have squad numbers seeing as they were involved a lot in pre season. I guess that Slade doesn't see them fitting into his squad as much as we first thought.
  • 1. Declan Rudd - Decent signing
    2. Kevin Foley - No idea
    4. Johnnie Jackson - Legs have gone
    5. Patrick Bauer - Legs are healing
    6. Roger Johnson - Mouth needs cleaning out
    7. Ademola Lookman - Now a winger?
    8. Andrew Crofts - No idea
    10 Nicky Ajose - Decent looking signing
    11. Ricky Holmes - Decent looking signing
    12. Alou Diarra - Legs have to be going
    13. Dillon Phillips - OK as a back up.
    15. Ezri Konsa - Ok as back up
    16. Jason Pearce - No idea
    17. Tareiq Holmes-Dennis - Should be no.3
    18. Karlan Ahearne-Grant - Last chance saloon.
    20. Chris Solly - Knees struggled last season
    21. Morgan Fox - could be good at this level... but please take the no.3 shirt.
    22. El-Hadji Ba - Move on please chap... otherwise kick on please.
    23.Oliver Muldoon - TBC
    25. Ahmed Kashi - Once he's back I hope we see what we saw around a year ago... just for more games please.
    26. Harry Lennon - Good back up.
    27. Dimitar Mitov - Needs a loan.
    30. Lee Novak - Why 30? Should be no.9
    50. Jorge Teixeira - Same number as last season, not concerned yet.
  • Ross said:

    Interesting that Kennedy, Umerah, Thomas and RCC all had squad numbers last season but don't have one this season.

    I was expecting at least Hanlan and Umerah to have squad numbers seeing as they were involved a lot in pre season. I guess that Slade doesn't see them fitting into his squad as much as we first thought.

    I'm hoping it's a statement to those players...

    "Earn your squad numbers. Show me you deserve to have one."

    I am surprised about Hanlan as he's been involved a lot in pre season and has impressed.
  • Sponsored links:


  • sam3110 said:

    Kashi will get 3 when he's back. Indicates we are after another striker, and looks like Lookman is staying if he's got 7

    25. Ahmed Kashi
  • Until Bergdych goes, I guess he "owns" number 3; Igor is 14, so they can't use that either as he'll be next year. Now left hoping for a Prem loan number 9....
  • Ross said:

    Interesting that Kennedy, Umerah, Thomas and RCC all had squad numbers last season but don't have one this season.

    I was expecting at least Hanlan and Umerah to have squad numbers seeing as they were involved a lot in pre season. I guess that Slade doesn't see them fitting into his squad as much as we first thought.

    I'm hoping it's a statement to those players...

    "Earn your squad numbers. Show me you deserve to have one."

    I am surprised about Hanlan as he's been involved a lot in pre season and has impressed.
    It's a bit strange for me, although it's clear that this was sorted out at the last minute. Thought those two would at least get squad numbers. I think saying "earn your number" is irrelevant. Hanlan has looked good in pre-season, Umerah looks a decent player and was unlucky to get a nasty injury. I assume this means Hanlan won't be on the bench tomorrow, which means that the three strikers in our team will be Ajose, KAG, and Nowak if fit.
  • robroy said:

    sam3110 said:

    Kashi will get 3 when he's back. Indicates we are after another striker, and looks like Lookman is staying if he's got 7

    25. Ahmed Kashi
    Ah didn't see him down there, thanks
  • Didn't Novak want 9?

    Why not? No different to Watt always wanting no. 32...
  • Novak 'opted' for the Number 30 shirt, obviously didnt fancy 9.
  • I think it's easy to read too much into squad numbers, but here, let me read something into them:

    1. Not surprisingly, Tex has kept 50, which I suspect means he's on the move (otherwise I think he'd get a higher number
    2. RoJo will have a big role to play given he has the number 6 shirt
    3. With Lookie taking 7, I hope that means we intend to keep him. That said, even if we intend to keep him, a big offer might come along that we can't refuse.
    4. I hope Kashi taking 25 is by choice (I vaguely recall that he wore that at a previous club but could be wrong) and not an indicator that he's off once he's fit.
    5. Desperately wish we had a more impressive number 8 than Crofts, but numbers only mean so much
  • edited August 2016

    Ross said:

    Interesting that Kennedy, Umerah, Thomas and RCC all had squad numbers last season but don't have one this season.

    I was expecting at least Hanlan and Umerah to have squad numbers seeing as they were involved a lot in pre season. I guess that Slade doesn't see them fitting into his squad as much as we first thought.

    I'm hoping it's a statement to those players...

    "Earn your squad numbers. Show me you deserve to have one."

    I am surprised about Hanlan as he's been involved a lot in pre season and has impressed.
    I think it's a statement all right, but to Meire and Duchatelet. Taking off the third keeper and five (?) injured that is the smallest possible squad Slade could have given numbers in order to put out 18 players tomorrow. Like his style.
  • Pedro45 said:

    Until Bergdych goes, I guess he "owns" number 3; Igor is 14, so they can't use that either as he'll be next year. Now left hoping for a Prem loan number 9....

    Wasn't Kashi 3 last season?
  • We are signing a new number 3.
    Fox is on standby at 21. 2+1=3
  • Sponsored links:


  • Fiiiiiish said:

    Pedro45 said:

    Until Bergdych goes, I guess he "owns" number 3; Igor is 14, so they can't use that either as he'll be next year. Now left hoping for a Prem loan number 9....

    Wasn't Kashi 3 last season?
    He was. ZB was number 19.
  • SDAddick said:

    I think it's easy to read too much into squad numbers, but here, let me read something into them:

    1. Not surprisingly, Tex has kept 50, which I suspect means he's on the move (otherwise I think he'd get a higher number
    2. RoJo will have a big role to play given he has the number 6 shirt
    3. With Lookie taking 7, I hope that means we intend to keep him. That said, even if we intend to keep him, a big offer might come along that we can't refuse.
    4. I hope Kashi taking 25 is by choice (I vaguely recall that he wore that at a previous club but could be wrong) and not an indicator that he's off once he's fit.
    5. Desperately wish we had a more impressive number 8 than Crofts, but numbers only mean so much

    Teixeira wants 5, Bauer has first dibs on it so instead of getting a random number he stuck with 50, as 5+0 is still 5. Dont be surprised if he puts a tiny decimal point between the numbers on his kit, like Zamorano at Inter wanted number 9 but Ronaldo had it, so we went for 18 and drew a plus sign between the numbers
  • sam3110 said:

    SDAddick said:

    I think it's easy to read too much into squad numbers, but here, let me read something into them:

    1. Not surprisingly, Tex has kept 50, which I suspect means he's on the move (otherwise I think he'd get a higher number
    2. RoJo will have a big role to play given he has the number 6 shirt
    3. With Lookie taking 7, I hope that means we intend to keep him. That said, even if we intend to keep him, a big offer might come along that we can't refuse.
    4. I hope Kashi taking 25 is by choice (I vaguely recall that he wore that at a previous club but could be wrong) and not an indicator that he's off once he's fit.
    5. Desperately wish we had a more impressive number 8 than Crofts, but numbers only mean so much

    Teixeira wants 5, Bauer has first dibs on it so instead of getting a random number he stuck with 50, as 5+0 is still 5. Dont be surprised if he puts a tiny decimal point between the numbers on his kit, like Zamorano at Inter wanted number 9 but Ronaldo had it, so we went for 18 and drew a plus sign between the numbers
    We are overloaded at centre back. Tex must be off - better off putting the money towards a midfielder.
  • sam3110 said:

    SDAddick said:

    I think it's easy to read too much into squad numbers, but here, let me read something into them:

    1. Not surprisingly, Tex has kept 50, which I suspect means he's on the move (otherwise I think he'd get a higher number
    2. RoJo will have a big role to play given he has the number 6 shirt
    3. With Lookie taking 7, I hope that means we intend to keep him. That said, even if we intend to keep him, a big offer might come along that we can't refuse.
    4. I hope Kashi taking 25 is by choice (I vaguely recall that he wore that at a previous club but could be wrong) and not an indicator that he's off once he's fit.
    5. Desperately wish we had a more impressive number 8 than Crofts, but numbers only mean so much

    Teixeira wants 5, Bauer has first dibs on it so instead of getting a random number he stuck with 50, as 5+0 is still 5. Dont be surprised if he puts a tiny decimal point between the numbers on his kit, like Zamorano at Inter wanted number 9 but Ronaldo had it, so we went for 18 and drew a plus sign between the numbers
    We are overloaded at centre back. Tex must be off - better off putting the money towards a midfielder.
    Oh yeah I think he'll be off too, but I'm saying why he chose 50 least season, and why he's sticking with it now. He could have chosen 47,48,49 last year, or subs other random number, but he chose 50 as it was the closest to 5 he could get
  • SDAddick said:

    Ross said:

    Interesting that Kennedy, Umerah, Thomas and RCC all had squad numbers last season but don't have one this season.

    I was expecting at least Hanlan and Umerah to have squad numbers seeing as they were involved a lot in pre season. I guess that Slade doesn't see them fitting into his squad as much as we first thought.

    I'm hoping it's a statement to those players...

    "Earn your squad numbers. Show me you deserve to have one."

    I am surprised about Hanlan as he's been involved a lot in pre season and has impressed.
    It's a bit strange for me, although it's clear that this was sorted out at the last minute. Thought those two would at least get squad numbers. I think saying "earn your number" is irrelevant. Hanlan has looked good in pre-season, Umerah looks a decent player and was unlucky to get a nasty injury. I assume this means Hanlan won't be on the bench tomorrow, which means that the three strikers in our team will be Ajose, KAG, and Nowak if fit.
    KAG rumoured to be going out on loan to a League two team
  • Wonder why Kashi is now 25
  • No idea, wore 21 at Metz, 7 amongst others at Chateauroux
  • Squad numbers mean nothing. Usually more sentimental value.
  • Hanlan has got no 28.
  • Kevin foley has seemingly changed from 2 to now having 3 ?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!