What's all this about the Safety Advisory Group meetings being disclosed? Why would the FOIA apply to Charlton? Or were they obtained via a disclosure from the Met Police? Has anyone seen them?
What is off more immediate interest is that someone got hold of the Safety Advisory Group minutes via a freedom of information request and that they are now being quoted in the press.
Police seem to be unwilling to go along with Katrien desire to stop peaceful, legal protests or back up her claims of racism.
Yet more embarrassment for her on that and more to come when she has to apologise to Varney.
What's all this about the Safety Advisory Group meetings being disclosed? Why would the FOIA apply to Charlton? Or were they obtained via a disclosure from the Met Police? Has anyone seen them?
Well, not knowing who is on the Safety Advisory Group, I wouldn't want to speculate, but...
It is unlikely that CAFC is a public authority, within the meaning of the Act, and, so, I'd assume that any information would have been provided by an organisation that is a public authority. I'd even be surprised if they were covered by EIR (which has a wider remit).
The Met and the Council (if they are in attendance) would be public authorities, and so subject to the Act; provided that they "held" the information - which, if they were provided with, or created their own, minutes of the meeting they would.
As FOI is disclosure to the public, there is no reason why (if you knew who had provided the information) you should not be provided with a copy if you now asked.
Ok so who is going to be the first to mention Colin in a post?
Well done Mr Varney. Will be interesting to see how this pans out. All because Meire is too arrogant to make a simple retraction after again putting her foot in her mouth.
The safety committee is formally convened and chaired by Greenwich Council, which is the licensing authority, something we once had to explain to Roger Alwen. The club attends and indeed hosts it, but it does not control it, as that would be nonsense. It is there to hold the club to account.
For that reason it is subject to FOI, although parts of the notes could be redacted by the police for operational reasons.
All because Meire is too arrogant to make a simple retraction after again putting her foot in her mouth.
Different magnitude of course but same scenario.
Meire has refused to apologise on the OS (as requested by CAS Trust) for saying to a newspaper in Belgium that she didn't care about the history of the club. Now she will have to explain to her former University why they are seeking the revocation of her prestigious 2016 award presented in March at a special ceremony at Leuven in Belgium for her achievements as CEO at Charlton.
All because Meire is too arrogant to make a simple retraction after again putting her foot in her mouth.
Different magnitude of course but same scenario.
Meire has refused to apologise on the OS (as requested by CAS Trust) for saying to a newspaper in Belgium that she didn't care about the history of the club. Now she will have to explain to her former University why they are seeking the revocation of her prestigious 2016 award presented in March at a special ceremony at Leuven in Belgium for her achievements as CEO at Charlton.
is this correct? they are revoking the award? How embarrassing and congrats to you for pushing it.
Will Varney do a Jordan and serve her the court papers at an embarrassing moment? Say first home game or at a signing press conference, it would be funny but I doubt it as the man has too much class.
All because Meire is too arrogant to make a simple retraction after again putting her foot in her mouth.
Different magnitude of course but same scenario.
Meire has refused to apologise on the OS (as requested by CAS Trust) for saying to a newspaper in Belgium that she didn't care about the history of the club. Now she will have to explain to her former University why they are seeking the revocation of her prestigious 2016 award presented in March at a special ceremony at Leuven in Belgium for her achievements as CEO at Charlton.
is this correct? they are revoking the award? How embarrassing and congrats to you for pushing it.
I think, although I stand to be corrected, that it is the Trust that is seeking the revocation.
Legal action will be a waste of everyone's time because no matter how you read what she said, she actually never said Peter Varneys bid included a move away from the Valley. She actually said the words 'but a proposal LIKE that included'
I'm just saying and I'm sure Peters lawyers will advise him so should be interesting.
The safety committee is formally convened and chaired by Greenwich Council, which is the licensing authority, something we once had to explain to Roger Alwen. The club attends and indeed hosts it, but it does not control it, as that would be nonsense. It is there to hold the club to account.
For that reason it is subject to FOI, although parts of the notes could be redacted by the police for operational reasons.
Exactly this.
Having said that all they had to do was ask me - as far as I'm aware the minutes aren't P&C and I've never been told that they are not to be published.
Indeed the minutes from last weeks SAG meeting should be out tomorrow.
It's just a shame that the CEO and the COO do not feel this meeting is important enough for them to personally attend
All because Meire is too arrogant to make a simple retraction after again putting her foot in her mouth.
Different magnitude of course but same scenario.
Meire has refused to apologise on the OS (as requested by CAS Trust) for saying to a newspaper in Belgium that she didn't care about the history of the club. Now she will have to explain to her former University why they are seeking the revocation of her prestigious 2016 award presented in March at a special ceremony at Leuven in Belgium for her achievements as CEO at Charlton.
is this correct? they are revoking the award? How embarrassing and congrats to you for pushing it.
I think, although I stand to be corrected, that it is the Trust that is seeking the revocation.
that's correct, we are backing @Coyotejohn1947 , who is a Trust member
Legal action will be a waste of everyone's time because no matter how you read what she said, she actually never said Peter Varneys bid included a move away from the Valley. She actually said the words 'but a proposal LIKE that included'
I'm just saying and I'm sure Peters lawyers will advise him so should be interesting.
Comments
The irony of our CEO being a lawyer is delicious though.
Has anyone seen them?
Police seem to be unwilling to go along with Katrien desire to stop peaceful, legal protests or back up her claims of racism.
Yet more embarrassment for her on that and more to come when she has to apologise to Varney.
It is unlikely that CAFC is a public authority, within the meaning of the Act, and, so, I'd assume that any information would have been provided by an organisation that is a public authority. I'd even be surprised if they were covered by EIR (which has a wider remit).
The Met and the Council (if they are in attendance) would be public authorities, and so subject to the Act; provided that they "held" the information - which, if they were provided with, or created their own, minutes of the meeting they would.
As FOI is disclosure to the public, there is no reason why (if you knew who had provided the information) you should not be provided with a copy if you now asked.
Well done Mr Varney. Will be interesting to see how this pans out. All because Meire is too arrogant to make a simple retraction after again putting her foot in her mouth.
Did anyone get any comments about her from those just leaving ?
For that reason it is subject to FOI, although parts of the notes could be redacted by the police for operational reasons.
Different magnitude of course but same scenario.
Meire has refused to apologise on the OS (as requested by CAS Trust) for saying to a newspaper in Belgium that she didn't care about the history of the club. Now she will have to explain to her former University why they are seeking the revocation of her prestigious 2016 award presented in March at a special ceremony at Leuven in Belgium for her achievements as CEO at Charlton.
I'm just saying and I'm sure Peters lawyers will advise him so should be interesting.
Having said that all they had to do was ask me - as far as I'm aware the minutes aren't P&C and I've never been told that they are not to be published.
Indeed the minutes from last weeks SAG meeting should be out tomorrow.
It's just a shame that the CEO and the COO do not feel this meeting is important enough for them to personally attend