The evidence that Meire is being overwhelmed by the levels of criticism levelled at her CEO stewardship of the Club is there for all to see and it has been evident at least since last year (e.g. the Dublin fiasco). She did two things to try to get out of the situation
1) Hired Mel Baroni as a PR/HOC - this collapsed spectacularly after 46 days when Baroni resigned in disgust seemingly at the Roland 'statement.'
2) She took a 10 day holiday in Dubai to get away from it all but without thinking of the consequences of her action and the timing of it.
Now, the latest outbursts looks like the result of someone who is so desperate and unable to cope that she has no option but to spread the blame for what is happening and deflect the criticism to anywhere but at her door because the main thing for her is not the interests of Charlton Athletic and its wellbeing but instead not losing face and not wishing to be seen as a failure by her mentor RD the one who had blind faith in her.
This desperation has led Meire into making wild comments which in her heart of hearts she knows she shouldn't have said.
Witness her ridiculous Alex Ferguson comparison when Guy Luzon was announced as the next manager but more tellingly look at her uncomfortable body language when she tries to defend the sacking (of Peeters) and then the appointment of Fraeye. She stated: “The five managers in that time (since Jan 2014) have improved our position (then after a pause) and our results every time." She knows, she just damn well knows that this is crazy bullshit but she said it anyway.
Now, remember, Roland 'doesn't do failure' so by extension neither does Meire. This means that every one of her catastrophic errors of judgement or flawed decisions is someone else's fault.
Under pressure and so desperate is she to hold on to the one business mantra she appears to hold above all others Never admit mistakes, never apologise. I believe she has slipped up again in the TalkSport piece (on a separate thread - Meire (again) etc) she states:
"It's disruptive to your business (to have so many managerial changes) and that's why we are now relegated. We had too many managers in a short time."
But Roland Duchatelet made those managerial changes (rubber-stamped by Meire). In that sentence above I see this as another faux pas by Meire.
For me, she is saying that the business (of Charlton Athletic) has been disrupted by the actions of the owner in making these constant changes.
She has distanced herself from the failure (of relegation) but at the expense as I see it of laying the blame on Duchatelet (plus player indiscipline as she puts it).
Is this not the greatest betrayal of all in their business relationship?
I cannot believe given all that we know that Meire did this deliberately. I think it more likely that yet again she spoke, as on so many past occasions, without thinking.
If Duchatelet should pick up on this then I would like to be in the room when he calls her in to explain herself. He seems to let everything else go that she cocks up but woebetide if she criticices him. A stint for her at a network club in Siberia would be my recommendation.
10
Comments
She should have some self respect and go find herself another job. It is, after all, only a job and life is too short.
I have little doubt with all this extra rope she will do little more than hang herself with it.
He was "let go" from his first job working for a telecoms company - a quote from his interview "'I lost my job, and I know that that looks like a personal failure."
First business - bankrupt
Political party - failed to make headway
Standard Liege - forced to sell up
Charlton Athletic - appointed KM, got relegated and put Euros millions at risk
I'm sure there must be plenty of other examples. The truth is out there.
*Where did that saying come from? Because you'd think a hill of beans would actually be worth something.
She can't accept blame. Only a relatively strong person can accept blame by thinking objectively and clearly. She is the voice of Roland. He supposedly tells her what to do and what to say, so much easier to trip and contradict yourself etc when trying to be open and honest.
She can't criticize the one main thing that deserves the criticism, and that is her boss...so she's beating around the bush on loads of other crap.
It seems like we'll be going round and round in these circles until he sells up. What a thought.
Humphrey Bogart (Rick) says to Ingrid Bergman (Ilsa)
"I'm no good at being noble, but it doesn't take much to see that the problems of three little people don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. Someday you'll understand that."
Do we know what these supporters think finally got him to leave?
Her first nature is to apportion blame elsewhere, now blaming the Douchebag, the players, her colleagues, the fans (sorry customers).
If she ever she comprehends the "real cause" for many of her continuing highly entertaining and self destructive gaffs.
OFF TO THE FUNNY FARM GIRLY, with one of those jackets with strange arms!