Who the hell interviewed the Belgian pillock and thought it was a good idea to sell him the club. Why did anyone think that his plans for the club were any good or did he tell a pack of lies as usual whoever sold him the club must take some of the blame.
4
Comments
Murray thought some of it seemed familiar but couldn't remember why.
*Powtoon is also free.
Are people really that ill-informed?
*Other forms of protest are available. Although, personally I would draw the line at hammering frozen sausages into his lawn....
No one could really see the forest for the trees. He is deceiving, as any businessman, what he potrays and tries to sell you has a hidden agenda and isn't what it seems.
That was the going rate for a championship club in London with the Fantastic wealth of the premiership ahead of you.
Thou that wasn't Duchatelet's raison d'etre.
Duchatelet even had the Relegation clause put in(saving millions) but Riga messed that up For Roland by keeping us up that season.
Compared to When Ron Nodes sold Palace to Mark Goldberg for 22 million
in 1997 but which didn't include Selhurst park stadium, of which 5 million was lent to Goldberg by Noades ! In 1998 Nodes was going to sell the club for 9 million to a group of Surrey/Kent business men.
The most worrying thing is that when RD sells the same will apply.