Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Why we should not send Yaya back...

AddickFC81
AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
in General Charlton
What Yaya did with his elbow was bad and he will serve a 3 game ban meaning he will be available again for Ipswich. I've heard fans saying we should send him back now. I don't think we should. When his ban is over and it will only be 3 games because most elbows like that is only 3. If the FA made it more that would be unfair because other elbows are only 3. Karl Robinson says it should be out the season. But you cannot change the rules now in the middle of the season. Even though it is not really defendable whether you agree games or not that is the rule and after 3 games he has served his punishment and deserves to prove his point. That is the first reason why I think he should stay. The second is unlikely to happen, but as already stated Karl Robinson think he should be out the season and if Yaya scored the goal that kept us up and resulted in MK Dons going down instead, then it really shove it right down Karl Robinson's throat. Karma. Yaya would be a legend forever. Now I know I am clutching at straws and it's highly unlikely but in the words of Kevin Keegan, "I would LOVE IT if happend if it happened that way, LOVE IT!"

Comments

  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,751
    He didn't elbow him, he swung his arm back and caught the player with the back of his hand. He deserved to get sent off, however the player made the most of it.
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    guinnessaddick said:

    He didn't elbow him, he swung his arm back and caught the player with the back of his hand. He deserved to get sent off, however the player made the most of it.

    I never said he didn't deserve to get sent off. I was saying once his punishment is served he deserves to come back.
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 10,959
    edited March 2016
    We are down. Makes no difference if he comes back or not. He won't come back and save us because we are gone.

    Down

    Finished
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,915
    Will he be here next year?

    No? Fuck him off now then.
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    DamoNorthStand said:

    We are down. Makes no difference if he comes back or not. He won't come back and save us because we are gone.

    Down

    Finished

    Was just saying. Only a harmless bit of fun.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,978
    DamoNorthStand said:

    We are down. Makes no difference if he comes back or not. He won't come back and save us because we are gone.

    Down

    Finished

    Sadly it'll be Rotherham who send MKD down not us
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    edited March 2016
    killerandflash said:

    DamoNorthStand said:

    We are down. Makes no difference if he comes back or not. He won't come back and save us because we are gone.

    Down

    Finished

    Sadly it'll be Rotherham who send MKD down not us
    Joking aside I reckon both MKD and Rotherham will stay up and going down with us and Bolton will be Fulham.
  • IA
    IA Posts: 6,103
    Anyone know how many games he'll be out for?
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    IA said:

    Anyone know how many games he'll be out for?

    3

    Boro (H) 12/3
    Massives (A) 19/3
    Brummy Blues (H) 2/4

    Back for the trip to Ipswich on 5/4.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,962
    Violent conduct.

    3 games suspension.

  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,978
    killerandflash said:

    DamoNorthStand said:

    We are down. Makes no difference if he comes back or not. He won't come back and save us because we are gone.

    Down

    Finished

    Sadly it'll be Rotherham who send MKD down not us
    I'd definitely be worried if I was a Fulham fan, as it's probably between them, Bristol City, MKD and Rotherham for the 3rd spot, with Huddersfield and Blackburn just about safe
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,215
    Send him back we've got Makienok.
  • IA
    IA Posts: 6,103
    I've heard he'll be out for 4 matches.
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    IA said:

    I've heard he'll be out for 4 matches.

    Is it his second red of the season then?
  • LuckyReds
    LuckyReds Posts: 5,866
    edited March 2016
    Really haven't understood the fuss about Yaya (see my player marks vs Brentford) - I really don't think he's what we need at the moment. I was surprised at how many people were chanting his name leaving Griffin Park, and my gut reaction upon hearing about the red card yesterday was "perhaps we can see Makienok and Harriott partner up in the next 3 games and keep Sanogo out".

    Before I get shot down regarding his hat-trick, I think it was fairly flukey and I'm actually reminded of Marvin Sordell's contributions over the season he was here. That said, it's still impressive and clearly he had a good match - but that was one match.

    I also don't like the thought of us incurring financial penalties if we don't play him - whilst I can understand that from Arsenal's point of view - it seems to undermine the meritocracy of what should be our starting 11.
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,838
    LuckyReds said:

    Really haven't understood the fuss about Yaya (see my player marks vs Brentford) - I really don't think he's what we need at the moment. I was surprised at how many people were chanting his name leaving Griffin Park, and my gut reaction upon hearing about the red card yesterday was "perhaps we can see Makienok and Harriott partner up in the next 3 games and keep Sanogo out".

    Before I get shot down regarding his hat-trick, I think it was fairly flukey and I'm actually reminded of Marvin Sordell's contributions over the season he was here. That said, it's still impressive and clearly he had a good match - but that was one match.

    I also don't like the thought of us incurring financial penalties if we don't play him - whilst I can understand that from Arsenal's point of view - it seems to undermine the meritocracy of what should be our starting 11.

    If Makienok and Harry can't keep a banned player out of the side for the next three games, they must be even more shit than I thought they were against The Franchise.
  • 3G
    3G Posts: 736
    Why should we keep him? So we can sing, to the Wham tune:

    "Wake me up, Yaya Sonogo
    I don't wanna see you throw another elbow"
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,738
    Why arent there calls to release Harry Lennon... He did the exact same thing?
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,218
    LuckyReds said:

    Really haven't understood the fuss about Yaya (see my player marks vs Brentford) - I really don't think he's what we need at the moment. I was surprised at how many people were chanting his name leaving Griffin Park, and my gut reaction upon hearing about the red card yesterday was "perhaps we can see Makienok and Harriott partner up in the next 3 games and keep Sanogo out".

    Before I get shot down regarding his hat-trick, I think it was fairly flukey and I'm actually reminded of Marvin Sordell's contributions over the season he was here. That said, it's still impressive and clearly he had a good match - but that was one match.

    I also don't like the thought of us incurring financial penalties if we don't play him - whilst I can understand that from Arsenal's point of view - it seems to undermine the meritocracy of what should be our starting 11.

    To be fair, we're not incurring financial penalties by not playing him, we just have a financial incentive if we do play him. Whatever our initial contribution to Sanogo's wage is likely isn't that high and that would have to be an amount that we could afford. I actually think it's a good idea for a normal team; if the player is good, he's actually increasingly great value, if he's poor, well he was bad value anyway
  • LouisMend
    LouisMend Posts: 5,457
    Hard to tell but I think it was an elbow rather than a back hand

  • Sponsored links:



  • bazjonster
    bazjonster Posts: 2,875
    Garrymanilow said:

    LuckyReds said:

    Really haven't understood the fuss about Yaya (see my player marks vs Brentford) - I really don't think he's what we need at the moment. I was surprised at how many people were chanting his name leaving Griffin Park, and my gut reaction upon hearing about the red card yesterday was "perhaps we can see Makienok and Harriott partner up in the next 3 games and keep Sanogo out".

    Before I get shot down regarding his hat-trick, I think it was fairly flukey and I'm actually reminded of Marvin Sordell's contributions over the season he was here. That said, it's still impressive and clearly he had a good match - but that was one match.

    I also don't like the thought of us incurring financial penalties if we don't play him - whilst I can understand that from Arsenal's point of view - it seems to undermine the meritocracy of what should be our starting 11.

    To be fair, we're not incurring financial penalties by not playing him, we just have a financial incentive if we do play him. Whatever our initial contribution to Sanogo's wage is likely isn't that high and that would have to be an amount that we could afford. I actually think it's a good idea for a normal team; if the player is good, he's actually increasingly great value, if he's poor, well he was bad value anyway
    With you. People have got far too carried away with him!
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    bazjonster said:

    Garrymanilow said:

    LuckyReds said:

    Really haven't understood the fuss about Yaya (see my player marks vs Brentford) - I really don't think he's what we need at the moment. I was surprised at how many people were chanting his name leaving Griffin Park, and my gut reaction upon hearing about the red card yesterday was "perhaps we can see Makienok and Harriott partner up in the next 3 games and keep Sanogo out".

    Before I get shot down regarding his hat-trick, I think it was fairly flukey and I'm actually reminded of Marvin Sordell's contributions over the season he was here. That said, it's still impressive and clearly he had a good match - but that was one match.

    I also don't like the thought of us incurring financial penalties if we don't play him - whilst I can understand that from Arsenal's point of view - it seems to undermine the meritocracy of what should be our starting 11.

    To be fair, we're not incurring financial penalties by not playing him, we just have a financial incentive if we do play him. Whatever our initial contribution to Sanogo's wage is likely isn't that high and that would have to be an amount that we could afford. I actually think it's a good idea for a normal team; if the player is good, he's actually increasingly great value, if he's poor, well he was bad value anyway
    With you. People have got far too carried away with him!
    If any goal he scores is the one that keeps us and sends MK down is the only goal he scores from now it don't matter it stll shoves it down Karl Robinson's throat.

Categories

“Marketplace”