Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
How good is Laura Trott?
Comments
-
Is onanism a version of the omnium?AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?2 -
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?6 -
I think there needs to be a bit more challenge to this than just 'would ya'.
How about if you could catch her on your bike, would ya? :-)
2 -
Is that a bit of spinach stuck to her teeth?ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?0 -
The problem with 'Would ya?' is that it's not light-hearted. It says that it doesn't matter how successful a woman is, the only things that are important are does she attract the opposite sex and would they want to have sex with her.Leroy Ambrose said:
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?5 -
Quite right.AddicksAddict said:
The problem with 'Would ya?' is that it's not light-hearted. It says that it doesn't matter how successful a woman is, the only things that are important are does she attract the opposite sex and would they want to have sex with her.Leroy Ambrose said:
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?
You just never see women oggling at Daniel Craig or David Beckham do you?
They'll all be drooling over a picture of Stephen Hawking in the latest edition of Science Magazine. They certainly would be doing that rather than talking about how fit physicist Brian Cox is.5 -
i hope she doesn't sleep with everyone saying they "would", i would hate to think she was a bit of a bike...0
-
Don't go getting all commonsensical with these people. They believe what they believe and they don't mind who they bore with it.cafcfan said:
Quite right.AddicksAddict said:
The problem with 'Would ya?' is that it's not light-hearted. It says that it doesn't matter how successful a woman is, the only things that are important are does she attract the opposite sex and would they want to have sex with her.Leroy Ambrose said:
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?
You just never see women oggling at Daniel Craig or David Beckham do you?
They'll all be drooling over a picture of Stephen Hawking in the latest edition of Science Magazine. They certainly would be doing that rather than talking about how fit physicist Brian Cox is.0 -
And people who reduce any thread about a woman to "would ya?" believe what they believe and don't mind who they bore with it.soapy_jones said:
Don't go getting all commonsensical with these people. They believe what they believe and they don't mind who they bore with it.cafcfan said:
Quite right.AddicksAddict said:
The problem with 'Would ya?' is that it's not light-hearted. It says that it doesn't matter how successful a woman is, the only things that are important are does she attract the opposite sex and would they want to have sex with her.Leroy Ambrose said:
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?
You just never see women oggling at Daniel Craig or David Beckham do you?
They'll all be drooling over a picture of Stephen Hawking in the latest edition of Science Magazine. They certainly would be doing that rather than talking about how fit physicist Brian Cox is.
Shall we leave it at that?2 -
BINGO!!!!0
- Sponsored links:
-
funnily enough i heard her being interviewed on the radio this morning ..she should be tested for helium !
great performance by her i hope she becomes our greatest female Olympian0 -
Trott, would ya?
Yes from me.
You're a bundle of laughs. Lighten up.AddicksAddict said:
And people who reduce any thread about a woman to "would ya?" believe what they believe and don't mind who they bore with it.soapy_jones said:
Don't go getting all commonsensical with these people. They believe what they believe and they don't mind who they bore with it.cafcfan said:
Quite right.AddicksAddict said:
The problem with 'Would ya?' is that it's not light-hearted. It says that it doesn't matter how successful a woman is, the only things that are important are does she attract the opposite sex and would they want to have sex with her.Leroy Ambrose said:
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?
You just never see women oggling at Daniel Craig or David Beckham do you?
They'll all be drooling over a picture of Stephen Hawking in the latest edition of Science Magazine. They certainly would be doing that rather than talking about how fit physicist Brian Cox is.
Shall we leave it at that?
0 -
I can't think of a polite response so I'll say nothing.ramy said:Trott, would ya?
Yes from me.
You're a bundle of laughs. Lighten up.AddicksAddict said:
And people who reduce any thread about a woman to "would ya?" believe what they believe and don't mind who they bore with it.soapy_jones said:
Don't go getting all commonsensical with these people. They believe what they believe and they don't mind who they bore with it.cafcfan said:
Quite right.AddicksAddict said:
The problem with 'Would ya?' is that it's not light-hearted. It says that it doesn't matter how successful a woman is, the only things that are important are does she attract the opposite sex and would they want to have sex with her.Leroy Ambrose said:
You're right. Im humbled by the fact I've ever found pretty, successful women attractive, and mentioned it lightheartedly in public. I feel ashamed.AddicksAddict said:
I think the question is not "Would ya?", but "Would ya stand a chance?", and for all the saddos on here who can't talk about women without reducing them to objects of lust, the answer is obviously "No". Not with Laura Trott, not with Lizzie Armistead, not with any woman with any self-respect. Their best hope is probably onanism. Look on the bright side - at least you'd be having sex with someone you love.ForeverAddickted said:Leroy Ambrose said:Never mind Laura Trott. She's great, but Lizzie Armitstead is even better. Current world champion, and has won both the women's world cup races so far this year. On the road, which is much more of a lottery than the track.
Would ya?
You just never see women oggling at Daniel Craig or David Beckham do you?
They'll all be drooling over a picture of Stephen Hawking in the latest edition of Science Magazine. They certainly would be doing that rather than talking about how fit physicist Brian Cox is.
Shall we leave it at that?0
