For some players who have turned out for this fine club over the years it has been obvious to all that they were brilliant whilst others have attracted the collective agreement that they were thieving a living as a professional footballer. What about the ones in between, the ones who divided opinion down the middle causing levels of disagreement usually reserved for Question Time.
To name a few of relatively recent times... Holland, Lloyd Sam and Kishishev. For me all in the good players camp but I had many mates who vehemently argued they were shite.
Any more?
0
Comments
"Who don't you rate in football"
Matt Holland came the reply, (Matt was still at Ipswich)
Curbs did, a year later he was playing for us !
Then we had a owner who listened to his Manager.
Suspect Mak is the current day Leaburn?
Reza
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi6tjHpqOJk
Andy Jones
Keith Jones
Jamie Stuart
Phil Chapple
Denis Romedahl
Mooney
Pritchard and Jackson in recent years.
Never hid, never shirk a shift, got bashed up for the cause most weeks and IMO was a far better player than he got credit for. He had a long career in the top two divisions and other players loved playing alongside him. You don't get that recognition without reason.
I think the sort of players you're talking about are often overlooked by many customers because they are performing a role for the team rather than being a flair player going out and expressing themselves...see Keith Jones for example.
Sadly all too rare though, 9 times out of 10 it was run, stop, turn back and pass inside - was a waste.
And I won't hear a word against Matt Holland. Whenever anyone says 'Captain Cleanshorts' I know I'm never speaking to them about football again.
Emmanuel Frimpong
Jimmy Giles
Dale Steohens
Danny Hollands
Danny Green
Paul Konchesky
Kyel Reid