After finding out that KM's web summit thing was on YouTube 2 weeks before we saw it I decided to try and dig up some more dirt on the pair of them.
I couldn't really find anything but what struck me was that everything that came up about Duchatelet (aside from football) was just about money. Not about electronics or his businesses, just about money.
A couple of links for you:
Here he is a keynote speaker at what seems to be some kind of business conference but he starts off talking about money, taxes, economy etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPk0ERSPoLAHere he is again on a programme about income
https://youtu.be/8zNEG5FXv8I?t=46m5sAnd let's not forget that he owns 5 football clubs and apparently tried to add to that with Tours last season during the Andy Delort saga. None of which he seems to have any previous affiliation with aside from St Truiden?
If you think about foreign owners,
generally they own clubs as some kind of social status symbol. A toy for them to play around with.
This doesn't seem to be the case with Duchatelet as he doesn't watch the games, doesn't seem to be interested in the football and he has been quoted on saying "The difference between me and other owners is that I don't care if we win".
So I started thinking about his motives and came across a couple of comments on reddit:
Now I know money laundering seems pretty far fetched. But it would explain what his motives were as it seems the man is totally obsessed with money. The issues with the transfer of Tony Watt add fuel to this fire.
I don't really know what/how he could be doing something like this but it has really got me thinking. Anyone have any ideas?
Now I'll just wait for someone to tell me that he's already stated his motives for owning us in an interview 2 years ago and that it's a totally believable one.
Comments
beyond parody... and VERY Charlton..
Edit - If you're still awake at about 18 mins in, you'll see that about 95% of seats in the auditorium are vacant.
I must admit I missed that CL discussion completely at the time. There is a link in there to the original Flemish.
Actually, I'm not 100% certain how to translate the key Flemish verb "verantwoorden". Venanzi appears to say that "we found bills of 200,000 euros for players' agents were not recognised." What does "recognised" mean in context? Another meaning it has is "accounted for". The payments were not even accounted for. That makes more sense. He is contrasting that with the elaborate penny-pinching over staff wages.
Also, sorry that my memory played a trick: it wasn't elaborate schemes to avoid tax, just avoid paying slightly more wages.
Not sure if that has ever been fully established, but I may be wrong.
The comments from Venanzi at SL seem to lend some weight to this.
He sees huge possibility in making money from innovations that already exist. Does he see us as one of those innovations?
Any one know how long he stuck with it before he decided to give it the elbow?