Official figures, compiled by the FL
15 clubs paid more than us in the period under review.That period is, to be fair, relatively recent. But one of RD's stated aims with his network is to address the ridiculous amount of money spent on agents. Whether these figures show he is succeeding, is a very moot point. Take a look...
Comments
Average £1,088,500
Highest: Cardiff £2,828,133
Charlton: £656,759 (17th, 60% of avg)
Lowest: Rotherham £185,430
(Premier League average £6.5M - six times the Championship level)
The majority of players now surely have agents or at least should do. Not sure many youngsters will have the level of business acumen or capability to successfully negotiate contracts with shrewd CEOs (at most clubs lolz) and so they are a necessary evil.
It's double standards to expect players to be loyal to a club when they are successful and not look out for number one when they court the interest of other clubs whilst at the same time clubs will move a player off the payroll on a whim if they're not performing or not in the current managers plans.
Most of us will have probably left jobs for seemingly better jobs at some point and probably often used recruitment agencies which is a similar principal.
As pointed out by Uboat it's paying fees for the garbage signings that grates but that's where your smart scouting and recruitment policy should come in.
So I will just say ^^^^ this ^^^^^
These people have a contract with the players not the club. Whereas recruitment agencies generally have a contract with the prospective employer. So a different kettle of fish.
He said when he signed from Newcastle for WBA, Ozzie Ardiles their manager at the time, spoke to him and said this is the maximum we can pay you so don't bother with your agent. Andy Hunt insisted on bringing his agent in. After some time negotiating, the agent came out of Ardiles' office and said - Sorry Andy they won't budge on your wages - that'll be 10% please.
Suppose if it changed to that players paid out of their pockets they'd just command higher wage/ signing fee to cover the agent's fee so the clubs would still end up paying it albeit indirectly.
I still believe that football has, through the greed of those who are allowed to control it, gotten itself into one hell of a mess and that clubs shouldn't be paying agents one single penny. It's just that this isn't the table to prove it.
I'm not saying that there aren't some agents that are absolute chancers, nor am I saying the amounts paid to agents aren't out of control, but I don't think it's as simple as saying they're all "parasites" or "monsters".
I can see the argument that football players are not like managers in business, they need someone on their side.
But it's completely unacceptable to have agents who play both sides, as they do now. That is what happened in the case of Gomez. This sort of shit should be outlawed, but how, and who will outlaw it? Not FIFA in anything like its current incarnation, that's for sure.
The PFA has a proposal, that they should play the role of looking after the players, leaving the agents to behave more like recruitment or exec search consultants in normal business, where their clients are the clubs, and only the clubs. But they don't seem to be getting very far with this idea. Too many club chairmen fall under the spell of agents, that's one of the problems.
I really hope so. The football reset button is long overdue being pressed.
A football club wants a player, the player says talk to my agent.
The player is known to the club and the agent is employed by the player.
A 'normal' company looking for an employee probably would not be aware of me or all the available talent so they would approach a recruitment agency to find the talent on their behalf.