The Telegraph has ranked all of the stadiums to have appeared in the Premier League. They claim that their criteria are "size, atmosphere, facilities, setting, aesthetics... and the pies".
Selhurst is ranked 46 out of 54! As for The Valley... we're at number 30. Obviously I'm biased but I think that's a bit harsh. They say:
"Unrecognisable from the derelict Valley of the early 1990s, Charlton's home has been dragged, kicking and screaming, into something approaching the 21st century. The club could yet expand the capacity to beyond 40,000."
Link to the article
Comments
Utter shite ground, utter shite club, and utter shite fans - perfectly matched.
But I'd have Selhurst park much high, just because of there fans being amazing and the best in the world, that sister act song is brilliant and what other ground would need escorting own fans for there safety....sorry our safety
Also, the away experience may be very different from the home experience. The Jimmy Seed, for example is the worst stand at The Valley, while Palace uniquely have 2 tired side stands, but a very decent home end.
We should be behind Stamford, Goodison, OT, Emirates, Anfield, Upton Park, WHL, St James, St Mary's, SOL, Villa, Emptihad, on a par with stoke, liberty, hillsborough, Elland, Hawthorns, Carrow, Molineaux, KC, St Andrews, King Power, pride, ahead of Loftus, Macron, Riverside, Ewood, Vicarage, Sellout, Craven, Bloomfield, Bournemouth, Ipswich, Pompey, Cardiff, turf moor, Wigan and almost all of the old ones like dell, Maine road etc
I don't believe in the soul as such, but I find the whole Charlton experience increasingly soulless.
Meh, I'm old and things were better when I was young.
It reminds me of the stadiums that u got with subbuteo
Loads of leg room up in the gods of the away fans.