Kinsella Junior

Comments
-
Well we are a bit short of right back cover. Won't be dear.0
-
Dont look much like his Dad0
-
If he's half the player his dad was, he'll have a very good career.2
-
With that shirt and his hairstyle.......is it the 1980s all over again?2
-
I have a photo of Liam with Kins & c'tee members of NWKA when we sponsored his shirt the first season he joined us.
Must have been around 3 or 4 then.3 -
I can see the resemblance. Also, it sounds like he playes a bit like him: 'He has energy and enthusiasm is abundance'ForeverAddickted said:Dont look much like his Dad
0 -
Not so much in the hair but certainly in the facial expresions0
-
Does he take corners from the edge of the 18 yard box?12
-
Sign him up NOW!0
-
I think there's more resemblance in this photo!5
- Sponsored links:
-
Frankie Muniz?4
-
Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.5
-
Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)Henry Irving said:Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.
0 -
So he got the winnerAddick Addict said:
Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)Henry Irving said:Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.
4 -
No because, had he not scored, Walsall would still have won. Therefore his goal can't be deemed the winner.Henry Irving said:
So he got the winnerAddick Addict said:
Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)Henry Irving said:Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.
2 -
Plus had Burton equalised... It would have meant nothingAddick Addict said:
No because, had he not scored, Walsall would still have won. Therefore his goal can't be deemed the winner.Henry Irving said:
So he got the winnerAddick Addict said:
Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)Henry Irving said:Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.
0 -
He scored the opener, the question is did he punch the air after the win?2
-
Except a whole different set of events would have taken place had his shot (header or whatever) been missed, so it wouldn't necessarily have finished 1-0.Addick Addict said:
No because, had he not scored, Walsall would still have won. Therefore his goal can't be deemed the winner.Henry Irving said:
So he got the winnerAddick Addict said:
Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)Henry Irving said:Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.
0 -
Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.
In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.3 -
Yes but, logically, in a 2-0 win the first goal is as irrelevant as the second one, because they would still have won 1-0 had either not been scored. Therefore neither goal is the winning goal.Powell Is Pleasant said:Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.
In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.1 - Sponsored links:
-
If the Pope shat in the woods, would that make the bear a Catholic?2
-
Your opinion is ugly and wrong.Addick Addict said:
Yes but, logically, in a 2-0 win the first goal is as irrelevant as the second one, because they would still have won 1-0 had either not been scored. Therefore neither goal is the winning goal.Powell Is Pleasant said:Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.
In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.1 -
Sign him up.0
-
The Peacock lad slipped through the net, lets not make the same mistake again eh?2
-
Yes but fortunately I am handsome and right.Powell Is Pleasant said:
Your opinion is ugly and wrong.Addick Addict said:
Yes but, logically, in a 2-0 win the first goal is as irrelevant as the second one, because they would still have won 1-0 had either not been scored. Therefore neither goal is the winning goal.Powell Is Pleasant said:Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.
In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.0 -
At 1-0 it's still squeaky bum time till the end 2-0 is a comfortable cushion so both goals are as important as each other0
-
If he's half as good as his Dad he'd still be twice as good as anything we have now so I'd say get him in.The Red Robin said:Sign him up.
6 -
Except everyone knows two-nil is the hardest score to defend so the second goal really makes it squeaky bum time.floydroadfaithfull said:At 1-0 it's still squeaky bum time till the end 2-0 is a comfortable cushion so both goals are as important as each other
7 -
The other team didn't score so, even if Walsall had scored eight, they only needed to score one to win so young Kins did score the winner.2
-
This is dumb. The winner is a goal that definitely makes the difference between a draw and a win. If a team wins by more than one there is no winning goal.9