Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton bigger than Palace , it's official!

bucksheebuckshee
in General Charlton
Table in today's Mail.


image
«1

Comments

  • Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    edited March 2015
    Not sure about arsenal being bigger than Liverpool, West Bron's position and Leeds being so low but that's a decent list.
  • lo filo fi
    We are no.1 in South London, that is what matters most
  • bucksheebuckshee
    Gumbo said:

    West Ham fan now @buckshee?

    Not mine mate. Moose from talksport.
  • Valley11Valley11
    West Brom 11th and bigger than West Ham.....hmmmm
  • AFKABartramAFKABartram
    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??
  • charltonkestoncharltonkeston
    Mid-table once again.
  • RedChaserRedChaser
    edited March 2015
    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    Just out of interest boss how many different countries do we have Lifers in, didn't you give those stats out once?

    Edit, just seen this on the 'Joint 27th with Fulham' concurrent thread;
    They explain it's based on global following on the clubs' Twitter and Facebook accounts. Must be a lot more overseas Addicks than we thought. Without that 14 ranking Charlton would be quite a bit lower in the overall table. Not to be taken seriously anyway.
  • wmcf123wmcf123
    Vacuous, but good to see us ahead of Palace for the first time in 7 years
  • Sponsored links:


  • AFKABartramAFKABartram
    Reza ->
  • stonemusestonemuse
    Stig said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    image
    yup, that's the one :wink:
  • Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    shirty5 said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    All the Reza lovers on Facebook
    Facebook gold when Ben Haim signed!

    Leed's global fanbase is 23rd to our 14th, mmm....
  • East_Stand_LoopyEast_Stand_Loopy
    Stig said:

    BigRedEvil said:

    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!

    So much for all this absolute nonsense they like to prattle on about, about being "the worlds biggest small club". They ain't even that. They're the second smallest middling club in England.
    Errrr.

    That list shows the top 50.

    Last time I looked, there were 92 clubs in the 4 divisions of the Football League...
  • StigStig
    East_Stand_Loopy said:

    Stig said:

    BigRedEvil said:

    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!

    So much for all this absolute nonsense they like to prattle on about, about being "the worlds biggest small club". They ain't even that. They're the second smallest middling club in England.
    Errrr.

    That list shows the top 50.

    Last time I looked, there were 92 clubs in the 4 divisions of the Football League...
    Yes, that's why I said 'middling'. The ones below are too small to be mentioned.
  • Henry IrvingHenry Irving
    edited March 2015
    buckshee said:

    Table in today's Mail.


    image

    Isn't the most interesting fact here that buckshee drinks out of a "Keep Calm and follow West Ham" mug
  • Sponsored links:


  • bucksheebuckshee
    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    Table in today's Mail.


    image

    Isn't the most interesting fact here that buckshee drinks out of a "Keep Calm and follow West Ham" mug
    Not me matey

    image
  • jonseventyfivejonseventyfive
    Surprisingly more addicks than you would think up here in Northamptonshire, we train down from Bedford with only 1 palace fan, he takes our differing opinions very well indeed.
  • stevedixonstevedixon
    Brighton & Bristol City below Wigan?
  • jbcafcjbcafc
    Online link if interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3011776/Are-Manchester-United-Liverpool-Arsenal-Chelsea-biggest-club-Sportsmail-s-study-finally-settles-football-s-great-debate.html
  • thai malaysia addickthai malaysia addick
    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.
  • Hovi's BiscuitHovi's Biscuit
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    Paddy McCarthy was probably still there when the article was being written ;-)
  • cafcrocky87cafcrocky87
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    Number of players to have represented England historically, plus number of representatives at the 2014 World Cup.
  • MountsfieldParkMountsfieldPark
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    It's based on players who've played for England (not other British or foreign) + players at 2014 World Cup. They've never been in the top flight long enough historically to have much in the way of England players. Any at WC 2014?
  • Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    It's taking the future Pardew factor in to account.
  • MillwallFanMillwallFan
    Wigan shouldn't even be in top 50.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!