thanks to the 13 Lifers who gave marks, here are the averages:
Watt----------- 7.76 MoMGomez----------- 7.26
Johnson---------- 7.18
Solly------------- 7.06
Fox-------------- 7.06
Cousins---------- 6.94
Henderson------- 6.91
Eagles----------- 6.85
Buyens---------- 6.79
Dmitrovic-------- 6.50
Gudmundsson---- 6.47
Bulot------------ 6.06
Lepoint---------- 4.56
Team-- 6.72
extra stats here:
https://us.v-cdn.net/5000498/uploads/FileUpload/c7/cce4ff104fae43e9fb022db4cfdbf3.pdf
Comments
As for being representative I have no idea.
Remember the Statbank PoTY is very different to your normal one where the only decider is how you feel at the time of the vote. The Statbank one takes into consideration every game. Of course, the team's performance has a huge impact on marking as (imo) people mark a lot more harshly when we lose in comparison to a lot higher when we win. Henderson has benefited from missing a lot of the poor run (though you could say that's a sign of his importance that he has had an influence), so has retained a high average as a result.
Note, there is a 25 game qualifying level for the Statbank PoTY which Poyet just feel five games short of (but had by far and away the highest average), and i suspect the same thing may happen with Tony Watt if he continues as he is.
In a funny way, such games in which (nearly) everyone was reasonable I imagine produce less response than a brilliant win or a disastrous defeat, in which we want to take out our frustrations on the players with low marks!