Surely Callum Harriott was eligible for this match? Can someone explain why he did not account this as the third of his three match ban? He may have given the push to win the tie.
Surely Callum Harriott was eligible for this match? Can someone explain why he did not account this as the third of his three match ban? He may have given the push to win the tie.
What ?
If it is possible that his he could use an U21 game, as one of his matches, he would need to miss, to complete a ban.
Then he wouldn't have played, to give that extra push, to win the tie.
Surely Callum Harriott was eligible for this match? Can someone explain why he did not account this as the third of his three match ban? He may have given the push to win the tie.
What ?
If it is possible that his he could use an U21 game, as one of his matches he would need to miss, to complete a ban.
Then he wouldn't have played, to give that extra push, to win the tie.
I thought you was saying, that Charlton, should have nominated Harriot to play in this U21 game, in order to use up one of his match bans. IE if he had to miss one more game, then this one could be it & he could then return for the Brighton game.
However, you also say if eligible for this "he may have given the push to win the tie".
If the tie, you are referring to, is the U21 tie, then he couldn't play, if he was banned ??????????? :-)
Comments
Such a shame it went to pens - just a lottery as we well know.
Well done to the lads & hope they're not too downhearted.
If it is possible that his he could use an U21 game, as one of his matches, he would need to miss, to complete a ban.
Then he wouldn't have played, to give that extra push, to win the tie.
However, you also say if eligible for this "he may have given the push to win the tie".
If the tie, you are referring to, is the U21 tie, then he couldn't play, if he was banned ??????????? :-)