Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The mystery of the No. 18 shirt in the 1998 play-off final

So,

We're going through stuff we have at the museum and one of the items is a framed signed play-off final shirt.

It's slipping inside the frame so we need to take it out.

When we do we realise that this is match issued shirt with the embroidered "Wembley 1998"

They were never put on sale and it is the same short sleeve shirt as the two others we have (Mendonca's and Brown's).

But it has "18" on the back.

There was no number 18 that day. I even checked with the expert on all matters Charlton, Shirty5, and he was as stumped as us.

So why is there a number 18 play-off final shirt?

Over to you.

Comments

  • edited November 2014
    It was a spare one in case someone ruined their shirt by getting blood all over it from a cut head, or the Sunderland defenders were a bit too vigorous with the shirt-pulling?
  • Perhaps in case one of the players got injured in the warm up and we had to call on someone there but not actually in the team/bench?
  • aliwibble said:

    It was a spare one in case someone ruined their shirt by getting blood all over it from a cut head?

    Steve Brown's shirt still has some blood on the collar but as he said "it isn't mine".

    Could be but why 18 not 15, the next available number or just left blank?
  • Having had a look at the back of the programme yesterday I noticed it named more players than the 3 subs that we had that day (One of them was a certain Kevin Lisbie!!)

    So maybe the club got made enough shirts for a squad size of, say 22 players (This now leads to a question of just how many shirts were there..??)
  • A club will have a few players who aren't subs on the day in a larger matchday squad, in case someone gets injured in the warm up etc.
  • A club will have a few players who aren't subs on the day in a larger matchday squad, in case someone gets injured in the warm up etc.
  • But if someone got injured in the warm up, the sub would start the match wearing a number 1-11 (e.g. if Sasa had got injured warming up, presumably Petterson or Salmon would have started the game, but wearing #1)
  • Talal said:

    It was done to cause confusion 16 years on.

    It worked then

    Damn you Curbs
  • Sponsored links:


  • Someone put No 81 on upside down?
  • Perhaps they just gave the entire squad a shirt to mark the occasion
  • Perhaps they just gave the entire squad a shirt to mark the occasion

    Could well be but that then leaves the question of who was number 18?
  • Perhaps they just gave the entire squad a shirt to mark the occasion

    Could well be but that then leaves the question of who was number 18?
    Andy Delort
  • 18 you say? That can only be one man.

    image
  • it was Lee Harvey Oswald's......
  • It was the guess of how many times the ball would hit the back of the net that afternoon, not a bad guess.
  • Perhaps they just gave the entire squad a shirt to mark the occasion

    Could well be but that then leaves the question of who was number 18?
    Did we have squad numbers for the season then?
  • Kap10 said:

    Perhaps they just gave the entire squad a shirt to mark the occasion

    Could well be but that then leaves the question of who was number 18?
    Did we have squad numbers for the season then?
    No
  • Sponsored links:


  • A club will have a few players who aren't subs on the day in a larger matchday squad, in case someone gets injured in the warm up etc.

    A club will have a few players who aren't subs on the day in a larger matchday squad, in case someone gets injured in the warm up etc.

    You can say that again.
  • Perhaps they just gave the entire squad a shirt to mark the occasion

    Could well be but that then leaves the question of who was number 18?
    I remember a young Paul Konchesky had the number 18 shirt for a few years.
  • Perhaps the kit supplier charged £50 per shirt or 18 for £700. Someone thought "aha, we can get four free shirts here and if there's a museum one day there'll be a few spare".
  • Just thinking about the players who bundled Ilic after the penalty save ...

    Barness
    Chappell
    Mortimer

    I reckon it was Phil 'Bambi' Chappell
  • 18 you say? That can only be one man.

    image

    That's got to be a still from Les Miserables !

    (Oh, and " Bring him home" !)



  • I think it probably belonged to Golfie and referred to his desire to play 18 holes.
  • Stig said:

    I think it probably belonged to Golfie and referred to his desire to play 18 holes.

    Going by his relationship issues, I think he would settle for one hole at the moment.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!