Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Atleast now...

We can say we gave it a good go, even if we do go down. I love SCP but I do think Jose coming in has saved us. We've lost to Burnley and Derby, I can deal with that but these wins really are fantastic. Ps - Ben Hamer, you ABSOLUTE LAD

Comments

  • Riga hasn't saved us. He's done a very good job since coming in but he's not saved us. A change was very good though.
  • edited April 2014
    Granpa said:

    Lets not start that old chestnut again. Move forward together is the key, lets enjoy the rest of the season.

    Well said granpa.

  • edited April 2014

    I think we could and would have got these results with SCP, just saying

    Powell got a 3-0 defeat to Doncaster with a apparently stronger 11 then what Riga has..

    Riga got 6 points from Leeds and Forest away.. says it all
  • Powell has gone, time to move on.
  • I think we could and would have got these results with SCP, just saying

    I honestly don't think we would've

  • If Curbs was here we would of won all our games
  • Now if Jimmy Seed was still manager....
  • Sponsored links:


  • Green - Waggy

    Powell- Riga

    Same roundabout argument.
  • Dowie should have been given longer.
  • Powell has gone, time to move on.


    Ah, you have joined the move on crew, look out for even more grief than usual heading your way :)
  • Parkinson... If only he'd been given the resources #justsaying
  • shine166 said:

    Powell has gone, time to move on.


    Ah, you have joined the move on crew, look out for even more grief than usual heading your way :)
    Water of a duck's back.

    It was the anti-Powell people who were screaming "move on, move on" within hours of him going. I liked and still like Powell but he's gone, rightly or wrongly, so we have to move on.

    As Bedsaddicks says "If Jimmy Seed was still manager....." : - )
  • shine166 said:

    Powell has gone, time to move on.


    Ah, you have joined the move on crew, look out for even more grief than usual heading your way :)
    Water of a duck's back.

    It was the anti-Powell people who were screaming "move on, move on" within hours of him going. I liked and still like Powell but he's gone, rightly or wrongly, so we have to move on.

    As Bedsaddicks says "If Jimmy Seed was still manager....." : - )
    We could call it the south stand?
  • shine166 said:

    Powell has gone, time to move on.


    Ah, you have joined the move on crew, look out for even more grief than usual heading your way :)
    Water of a duck's back.

    It was the anti-Powell people who were screaming "move on, move on" within hours of him going. I liked and still like Powell but he's gone, rightly or wrongly, so we have to move on.

    As Bedsaddicks says "If Jimmy Seed was still manager....." : - )
    We could call it the south stand?

    Even the Club uses the right name now. Taken the best part of two decades but we got their.

    "Walking Floyd Road
    To see Jimmy's Aces"
  • I really don't get this insistence from various people that we should "move on". Powell's departure is still a relevant subject, particularly as many of us have concerns about the long term future of the club under Roland's ownership, and Powell's sacking forms part of that wider issue.

    Does "move on" only apply to the departure of managers and players, or does it relate to any decision relating to the club that some supporters disagree with?

    It's a good job that there were so many people who didn't just say "it's done now, best to move on" when we moved to Selhurst.
  • MrLargo said:

    I really don't get this insistence from various people that we should "move on". Powell's departure is still a relevant subject, particularly as many of us have concerns about the long term future of the club under Roland's ownership, and Powell's sacking forms part of that wider issue.

    Does "move on" only apply to the departure of managers and players, or does it relate to any decision relating to the club that some supporters disagree with?

    It's a good job that there were so many people who didn't just say "it's done now, best to move on" when we moved to Selhurst.

    But when people are posting things like 'CP would have got the same results' it becomes just as grating as the 'move on' comments.

  • Although I have not been to too many matches, it seems to me that the biggest difference between CP and Riga is that we do not go on the defence to hold on to the 1-0 lead now.
  • Sponsored links:


  • MrLargo said:

    I really don't get this insistence from various people that we should "move on". Powell's departure is still a relevant subject, particularly as many of us have concerns about the long term future of the club under Roland's ownership, and Powell's sacking forms part of that wider issue.

    Does "move on" only apply to the departure of managers and players, or does it relate to any decision relating to the club that some supporters disagree with?

    It's a good job that there were so many people who didn't just say "it's done now, best to move on" when we moved to Selhurst.

    But when people are posting things like 'CP would have got the same results' it becomes just as grating as the 'move on' comments.

    Exactly.

    Judge Riga good and bad on what he does. We don't need to keep saying "We would have lost that under Powell" or "We would have won that under Powell".

    We can never tell what might have happened if Powell had stayed so it all guess work and can't be proved either way. WHo knows who Powell would have signed given the chance or who would have got injured/sent off.

    Riga's doing a good job, we are edging away from relegation, we are three wins away from staying up IMHO. Back the team and the manager.
  • MrLargo said:

    I really don't get this insistence from various people that we should "move on". Powell's departure is still a relevant subject, particularly as many of us have concerns about the long term future of the club under Roland's ownership, and Powell's sacking forms part of that wider issue.

    Does "move on" only apply to the departure of managers and players, or does it relate to any decision relating to the club that some supporters disagree with?

    It's a good job that there were so many people who didn't just say "it's done now, best to move on" when we moved to Selhurst.


    It doesn't mean, in my view, we can never discuss Powell or anyone else. But what is pointless is saying "we would/wouldn't have done this or that under Powell" as that is guess work.

    And that works both ways for those who are trying to justify Powell's sacking and those defending him.

    No, it clearly doesn't relate to other decisions such as moving ground, ST prices, crossbars etc as they are still live and can be reversed. And as we proved were reversed.
  • MrLargo said:

    I really don't get this insistence from various people that we should "move on". Powell's departure is still a relevant subject, particularly as many of us have concerns about the long term future of the club under Roland's ownership, and Powell's sacking forms part of that wider issue.

    Does "move on" only apply to the departure of managers and players, or does it relate to any decision relating to the club that some supporters disagree with?

    It's a good job that there were so many people who didn't just say "it's done now, best to move on" when we moved to Selhurst.

    But when people are posting things like 'CP would have got the same results' it becomes just as grating as the 'move on' comments.

    Yeah, I agree that that argument is a bit tedious, whether it's from the "Powell would have done just as well" perspective, or the "Powell would never have got those results" perspective - there's no way of proving or justifying either argument. But any mention of Powell seems to provoke certain people to sending out "move on" instructions.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!