no, we need those things which other teams call crosses... hoof ball with Bent is pointless
I agree - Bent doesn't create anything in his own and since we sold Stephens we don't have enough to fashion chances for him so it would probably be a waste of money
The horse has already bolted. Spending money on a Bent loan, when that money could have been used to keep Kermorgant and Stephens.
Roland is worth over £500m. We should have been improving the squad, not ripping the backside out of it. So unnecessary and could well see us back in League one next season.
Yes, he'd give the whole club a big lift. Would form a very dangerous partnership with Reza. With Harriot on one wing, Wilson on the other and AA in midfield we'd create chances for them. We've had a couple of long term loans taken away from us in the past, Smirtin being one, can't remember the other? I'd be confident of staying up if we managed to get him, he'd be too hot for Championship defenders.
If we could even get him given his current season long loan.
If we could afford him.
Would still seem odd given, on analysis above we would have to pay 400K for his services which would suggest we had just spunked our Yann money on a loanee.
Does not make business sense in that regards and would effectively mean RD admitting a poor decision on Yann. Can't see it.
It makes perfect business sense - had we not sold Yann- we would have probably sp*nked £400k but had a better chance of staying up. Thus, losing less money. To bring in a player who may make a difference- we need to sp*nk some money.
The mistake in letting Yann and Stephens go can only be rectified IMO by sp*nking that money. And even with that, we need to find a couple of players of the right qulaity willing to come to us!
Comments
Roland is worth over £500m. We should have been improving the squad, not ripping the backside out of it. So unnecessary and could well see us back in League one next season.
If you could get him interested.
If he is fit enough
If we could create chances
If we could even get him given his current season long loan.
If we could afford him.
Would still seem odd given, on analysis above we would have to pay 400K for his services which would suggest we had just spunked our Yann money on a loanee.
Does not make business sense in that regards and would effectively mean RD admitting a poor decision on Yann. Can't see it.
The mistake in letting Yann and Stephens go can only be rectified IMO by sp*nking that money. And even with that, we need to find a couple of players of the right qulaity willing to come to us!