New Voice of The Valley 110 now available

Airman Brown

Out tomorrow and now available to order online. We'll be outside The Valley from 1pm tomorrow, probably beneath large umbrellas, but if you don't have a chance to get a copy there then online orders up to Sunday evening will be posted out first class on Monday morning.

More details at Voice of The Valley but I will say that in my opinion it's another very strong issue . . . then again, I'm obviously not the most reliable witness on that point!

Rob

Just paypal ordered for international delivery. Thanks Airman.

Off_it

Another free plug on the site you slagged off.

lancashire lad

so Rick was that your 3 boys with the flag sitting in front of us at Wigan?

Airman Brown

Off_it said:

Another free plug on the site you slagged off.

And your evidence for me slagging it off is where, exactly? Sad.

Airman Brown

lancashire lad said:

so Rick was that your 3 boys with the flag sitting in front of us at Wigan?

My flag, but not my boys...

Off_it

Airman Brown said:

Off_it said:

Another free plug on the site you slagged off.

And your evidence for me slagging it off is where, exactly? Sad.

It's in your rag. You published it. And now you want another free plug.

Call me sad if you like pal, it's nothing to what you are.

LargeAddick

it would be sad if such a mag only printed articles or letters that it agreed with. always good to read an opposing view even if you disagree with it.

Brendan_O_Connell

Off_it said:

Another free plug on the site you slagged off.

Very Harsh offy. It's a free country and the person who wrote the article is entitled to an opinion.

Airman did caveat next to the article in question that it wasn't his view, but people should have the right to express their thoughts whether or not we agree with them.

Personally I thought that the article was a load of nonsense, but VOTV (like Charlton) attracts different kinds of people from different walks of life with different views and opinions all of whom should be respected even if we think they are talking bollocks.

If anything I thought it showed how good CL is and how diverse it can be (the aftermath I mean).

It's not all about kissing people's rear end, I'm sure you'd agree.

bolloxbolder

off_it is so tiresome. Like a dog with a bone. Let it go ffs and get your facts right in future

Friend Or Defoe

Airman did an article next to it giving a counter argument, but this has probably been said before...

Henry Irving

And AFKA said move on and that AB was welcome to plug VOTV on here in future

AFKABartram

Lets put this to bed, we've no problem with Airman advertising VOTV on here, the same way we've no problem the Trust advertising their magazine, or anyone else who publishes a paper magazine.

if we were doing something similar then maybe there would be a potential conflict of interest to consider, but we don't and there's not, so good luck to all involved and i look forward to reading them.

Off_it

bolloxbolder said:

off_it is so tiresome. Like a dog with a bone. Let it go ffs and get your facts right in future

What fact have I got wrong? Enlighten me.

It's good of AFKA to act the bigger man (pun intended) in all of this, and of course it's a "free country", but I just find it all a bit distasteful and discourteous, that's all. Nobody's died. It's just my view. Like it or not. Doesn't bother me.

DaveMehmet

AFKABartram said:

Lets put this to bed, we've no problem with Airman advertising VOTV on here, the same way we've no problem the Trust advertising their magazine, or anyone else who publishes a paper magazine.

if we were doing something similar then maybe there would be a potential conflict of interest to consider, but we don't and there's not, so good luck to all involved and i look forward to reading them.

I've got a couple of ideas about publishing a magazine, catering for very niche markets in the adult entertainment world. Can I put up some of my initial test runs?

Steve Dowman

you still trying to launch that Rent Boy rag Mehmet?

Brendan_O_Connell

AFKABartram said:

Lets put this to bed, we've no problem with Airman advertising VOTV on here, the same way we've no problem the Trust advertising their magazine, or anyone else who publishes a paper magazine.

if we were doing something similar then maybe there would be a potential conflict of interest to consider, but we don't and there's not, so good luck to all involved and i look forward to reading them.

Right you are Guvnor.

Off_it said:

bolloxbolder said:

off_it is so tiresome. Like a dog with a bone. Let it go ffs and get your facts right in future

What fact have I got wrong? Enlighten me.

It's good of AFKA to act the bigger man (pun intended) in all of this, and of course it's a "free country", but I just find it all a bit distasteful and discourteous, that's all. Nobody's died. It's just my view. Like it or not. Doesn't bother me.

I always respect your views Offy, agree with most of them, not all of them though.

MrOneLung

DaveMehmet said:

AFKABartram said:

Lets put this to bed, we've no problem with Airman advertising VOTV on here, the same way we've no problem the Trust advertising their magazine, or anyone else who publishes a paper magazine.

if we were doing something similar then maybe there would be a potential conflict of interest to consider, but we don't and there's not, so good luck to all involved and i look forward to reading them.

I've got a couple of ideas about publishing a magazine, catering for very niche markets in the adult entertainment world. Can I put up some of my initial test runs?

Dont do it mate - Millwall mags never sell well.

seriously_red

AFKABartram said:

Lets put this to bed, we've no problem with Airman advertising VOTV on here, the same way we've no problem the Trust advertising their magazine, or anyone else who publishes a paper magazine.

if we were doing something similar then maybe there would be a potential conflict of interest to consider, but we don't and there's not, so good luck to all involved and i look forward to reading them.

Many thanks AFKA on behalf of the Trust.

killerandflash

I look forward to reading VOTV on the train back from the Valley at 3pm after the game is called off...

Stu_of_Kunming

Will there ever be a pdf version for those that can't receive mail?

razil

I say the more the merrier, blogs, forums, fanzines. It all enriches the CAFC family imho

Bolderhumphreyreid

Off_it said:

Airman Brown said:

Off_it said:

Another free plug on the site you slagged off.

And your evidence for me slagging it off is where, exactly? Sad.

It's in your rag. You published it. And now you want another free plug.

Call me sad if you like pal, it's nothing to what you are.

Absolute gem.

You're the worst. No, you are. You are.

Addickted

LargeAddick said:

it would be sad if such a mag only printed articles or letters that it agreed with. always good to read an opposing view even if you disagree with it.

You could say the same about Offy's post.

Phil

Had Rick not published that article then he could have been accused of the censorship of someone with opposing views. No one seems to like that on this site and if it that were the case there'd be little debate on here. Anyway, as someone said, it's been done to death and doesn't need raising every time there's a new voice.

se9addick

Looking forward to it, with this, TNT and a Charlton article in WSC there's going to be pleanty to read over the next few days.

ME14addick

My husband went searching for a VOTV seller but couldn't find one - where was it being sold?

Airman Brown

Usual places - outside the chip shop, opposite the Superstore and at the other end of Harvey Gardens - were all covered. You can order it online at www.votvonline.com if you missed us.

ME14addick

I expect my husband did a 'man look'!

se9addick

Left mines behind the Trust stall without being able to read it. Will it be on sale against QPR (or Weds next week)?

Airman Brown

I'm going to Wednesday but I doubt I'll be selling. Definitely QPR.