Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Middlesboro v Charlton - Player Marks

AFKABartramAFKABartram
in General Charlton
Usual marks out of ten please if you were there

Thuram
Wilson
Wiggins
Morrison
Wood
Cousins
Stephens
Jackson
Cook
Harriott
Kermorgant

Green
Church
Adjarevic on/a

Stat bank change

From now on the Statbank will show the MoM and average player marks for the game in the main body of the thread with all the extra stats in the usual pdf file.

Comments

  • NortheastredNortheastred
    Thuram - 3 You are having a laugh....very por
    Wilson - 6 did ok
    Wiggins - 5 Harsh sending off
    Morrison - 6 Solid
    Wood - 7 Solid and good distribution
    Cousins - 5 didn't do enough really
    Stephens - 6 did ok 2nd half
    Jackson - 5 not on the pace
    Cook - 5.5 Not on the pace of the game
    Harriott - 6 did ok
    Kermorgant - 7 decent contribution but needed support

    Green - 5 Not in the game
    Church - 6 Ran around and supported well
    Adjarevic - Can't run and didn't look like he could adapt to the pace, but not long enough to score
  • RedChaserRedChaser
    edited January 2014
    Thuram 5.5 goal seemed to go through him poor kicking two point blank saves late on
    Wilson 6 steady
    Wiggins 6 solid lost control of ball followed by bit of a lunge for red card
    Morrison 6 did ok
    Wood 6.5 best defender
    Cousins 5 not as assured
    Stephens 5 quiet game
    Jackson 4 legs gone for 2 games In 4 days
    Cook 3 ineffective and lightweight
    Harriott 5 tried but nothing came off
    Kermorgant 5.5 ploughed a lone furrow

    Green 4 typical
    Church 3 did he actually come on?
    Adjarevic 6 nice crisp passes like him
  • RedChaserRedChaser
    Cheers edited :0)
  • lancashire ladlancashire lad
    edited January 2014
    Thuram 6, ok he let one in but played very well for the rest of the match
    Wilson 5
    Wiggins 4
    Morrison 5
    Wood 6
    Cousins 4
    Stephens 4
    Jackson 4
    Cook 3
    Harriott 5 (increased from 3 to 5 after reflection)
    Kermorgant 5

    Green 4
    Church 3
  • BlucherBlucher
    Thuram - 5; conceded a poor goal. A couple of decent second half saves but his error was the pivotal moment in this game
    Wilson - 6: he and the rest of the back four contained their attackers, notably their wide men, pretty well
    Wiggins -6
    Morrison -6
    Wood-6
    Cousins-5
    Stephens-5
    Jackson-5
    Cook-4.5
    Harriott-7: offered an outlet and looked dangerous at times
    Kermorgant -6:laid the ball off pretty well but lacked support
    Green - not much of an impact
    Church - ditto
    Adjarevic on/a
  • No.1 in South LondonNo.1 in South London
    Thuram 5
    Wilson 5
    Wiggins 5
    Morrison 7
    Wood 6
    Cousins 7
    Stephens 5
    Jackson 5
    Cook 5
    Harriott 5
    Kermorgant 5

  • fielderdanielfielderdaniel
    I wasn't at the game but going on the football league highlights I'm surprised at church's scores as he actually had the ball in the net (didn't look like a foul to me) and Almost scored from an acute angle
  • ExiledinManchesterExiledinManchester
    Thuram - 6 he was the busier of the two keepers and made a couple of excellent saves, a pity his mistake cost us a point
    Wilson - 6
    Wiggins - 5.5 red may have been harsh but he was daft to go in the way he did
    Morrison - 6
    Wood - 6
    Cousins - 5
    Stephens - 5
    Jackson - 5
    Cook - 5
    Harriott - 5.5 beat his full back a number of times but final delivery was poor
    Kermorgant - 6

    Green - 4 poor
    Church - 5 added some urgency up front
  • Taxi_LadTaxi_Lad
    surprised how low the scores are generally considering we lost by one flukey goal away to an in-form team
  • Sponsored links:


  • No.1 in South LondonNo.1 in South London
    Taxi_Lad said:

    surprised how low the scores are generally considering we lost by one flukey goal away to an in-form team

    we didn't really give it a go against a team who were no great shakes even given their recent form. We did not look up for it and it was very typical of many of our below par performances this season. We were organised enough to not get out played but we did so little to trouble either their back four or beyond them Given. We lack belief on the field and in the stands but as everyone realises we need better quality as an attackung threat. Those that think it is just one or two that we need are misguided in my opinion. The majority or our players are sound defensively and well disciplined but we are threadbare on forward strategy. I fear we are in a very similar situation (albeit a league better off)as three seasons ago and need a complete overhaul if we are to be taken serioiusly in this division.
  • se9addickse9addick
    edited January 2014
    Interesting and varied marks for Thuram - how would those that were there compare him to Alnwick and Hamer in terms of shot stopping, distribution etc ?
  • lancashire ladlancashire lad
    edited January 2014
    se9addick said:

    Interesting and varied marks for Thuram - how would those that were there compare him to Alnwick and Hamer in terms of shot stopping, distribution etc ?

    a different style of shot stopping, also he is very quick to leave his line and use any part of his body to get the ball. As for distribution I don't remember him throwing the ball out and most of his kicks were long and flat to one of our players, he did kick directly into touch a couple of times. His one mistake was to misjudge the bounce of the ball, but he wasn't the only one to do that, unfortunately it resulted in a goal.

    When you consider it was his first game in the the UK with an unknown team I'd say he did well and could be better than what we have.
  • lancashire lasslancashire lass
    Thuram 6
    Wilson 5
    Wiggins 5
    Morrison 5.5
    Wood 6
    Cousins 4.5
    Stephens 4.5
    Jackson 4
    Cook 4.5
    Harriott 5
    Kermorgant 5

    Green 5
    Church 4.5
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!