I think it is important to preceed this post by saying that I absolutely support Chrissy Powell and acknowledge he is the best person to take us forwards. But one thing that does frustrate me is his apparent onservatism in his approach to games. This i think was clearly demonstrated in his post Boro match comments. He indicated the importance of a point when you are not playing well and the need to not make silly errors. I think this is quite telling and explains why this aspect does frustrate me as I think a point is no big deal in terms of you can make it up by winning your next game! I'm probably more a Kevin Keegan than a George Graham! I’d rather we took a few risks tro try and change the pattern of the game – which may or may not of course pay off. I think Chrissy was happy for the game to continue in the way it did on Saturday as Boro didn't really look like they would score - like we didn't and changing that could have had a negative impact!
You get conservative managers and adventurous managers in the game and both have been successful. The team often reflects the manager and some teams after equalising against Bournemouth for instance, may have seen an opportunity to put them on the back foot. I think we think – a point away from home is good, let’s be tight and be ready if an opportunity comes our way. Of course you need a crystal ball to know what would have happened had we really tried to push on – maybe we would have let in more goals – but I do feel we lost more points than we gained last season through this approach.
I’d love to see Chrissy be a bit more adventurous – for instance – taking off a defender for an extra striker against Boro to try and change things. It is clear that is not Chrissy’s way though and I’ll just have to put up with it. Does it frustrate others – it would be interesting to see what the consensus is on this matter!
0
Comments
It can be frustrating at times but, just as with Curbs, overall our results to standard of personnel are reasonable to good so I'll live with it.
On Saturday we lost Jackson, a vital player, at half time and, although Stephens flattered to deceive for 10 minutes, the midfield was poor and largely overun throughout.
I can therefore understand Chrissy's reluctance to expose us any more by bringing on a third striker for a defender.
Still - our next couple of games are crunch relegation matches and if we win them we will have a couple of promotion games to follow!
Equally you could say that Harriott skinned Richardson and whipped over crosses time after time.
He did it once by my reckoning.
Their goal was a soft header that would've been fielded by any keeper, assuming he hadn't already rushed out and missed the thing!
Just a thought as I have never met him and am going purely on observation and guesswork.
It was a pretty dull game, which although Boro definieltely looked the better and more coherent team, kind of had 0-0 written all over it, until we contrived to throw one in.