Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Royal Baby

1111214161729

Comments

  • another royal mouth for the state to assist feeding

    austerity???????????
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    buckshee said:

    I don't think they read Charlton life actually so you're wasting your time wishing them congratulations as much as everyone is saying RIP in the various threads on here.

    Just weird.

    Probably the best post in this thread.

  • Rizzo said:

    buckshee said:

    I don't think they read Charlton life actually so you're wasting your time wishing them congratulations as much as everyone is saying RIP in the various threads on here.

    Just weird.

    Probably the best post in this thread.

    Kate will have her head in the toilet bowl for the next couple of months but William might read it to her...



  • Prince William and Kate Middleton set to name their second child after ex-West Ham boss?
    ROYAL couple Prince William and Kate Middleton could name their second child after former West Ham boss Alan Curbishley… according to the bookies.

    http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/398752/Prince-William-and-Kate-Middleton-set-to-name-their-second-child-after-ex-West-Ham-boss
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    edited September 2014
    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them


  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them


    I don't see why anyone feels the need to talk about the Royal family at all on a football forum.
  • Prince William and Kate Middleton set to name their second child after ex-West Ham boss?
    ROYAL couple Prince William and Kate Middleton could name their second child after former West Ham boss Alan Curbishley… according to the bookies.

    http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/398752/Prince-William-and-Kate-Middleton-set-to-name-their-second-child-after-ex-West-Ham-boss

    So...will they pay out if it's called Alan or Llewellyn?

    ;-)
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    buckshee said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them


    I don't see why anyone feels the need to talk about the Royal family at all on a football forum.
    So does that go for any non football related topics? Really we shouldn't be talking about anything other than Charlton on a Charlton forum.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    Rizzo said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

    If it doesn't interest certain miserable people then they don't need to post or have digs. Simple.
  • Sponsored links:



  • These two are my royal babies!! I'm a lapsed member and now back for general Charlton chat!
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

    If it doesn't interest certain miserable people then they don't need to post or have digs. Simple.
    Yes, clearly anyone who doesn't feel the need to fawn all over the royal family must be miserable.

  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    Rizzo said:

    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

    If it doesn't interest certain miserable people then they don't need to post or have digs. Simple.
    Yes, clearly anyone who doesn't feel the need to fawn all over the royal family must be miserable.

    People who go out of their way to have a moan when a young British couple announce they are bringing a new person into the world, Royal or not, are miserable yes.
  • iaitch
    iaitch Posts: 10,230
    If moaning is not allowed on this forum then it might as well be closed down.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

    If it doesn't interest certain miserable people then they don't need to post or have digs. Simple.
    Yes, clearly anyone who doesn't feel the need to fawn all over the royal family must be miserable.

    People who go out of their way to have a moan when a young British couple announce they are bringing a new person into the world, Royal or not, are miserable yes.
    Utter bollocks! What about people who go out of their way to announce how delighted they are at the impending birth of someone they will never meet to parents that they have never and will never meet and do not know in any way? What are they then?

  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    Rizzo said:

    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

    If it doesn't interest certain miserable people then they don't need to post or have digs. Simple.
    Yes, clearly anyone who doesn't feel the need to fawn all over the royal family must be miserable.

    People who go out of their way to have a moan when a young British couple announce they are bringing a new person into the world, Royal or not, are miserable yes.
    Utter bollocks! What about people who go out of their way to announce how delighted they are at the impending birth of someone they will never meet to parents that they have never and will never meet and do not know in any way? What are they then?

    They're not as miserable.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    cafctom said:

    Rizzo said:

    Love the royals and love the anger and hate they fill up in some of your sad lives, for you to feel the need to post on a football forum such self righteous anti establishment bollox


    It must be a sad place you find yourselves in wjen you can't find joy in the wonders of children and the happiness they provide for those having them

    It's not about finding "joy in the wonders of children". It's about singling out a particular child simply because of its ancestry. There are approximately 700,000 children born in this country each year. I wish them and their parents every happiness but I don't see a thread for them on here. Just like I didn't see the mass hysteria and collective hand-wringing for the many other parents that died in a car crash in 1997, yet for some reason many people felt the need for it in relation to Diana, despite never having met her or her family.

    It's the whole idea that the Royal Family are in some way special and superior. The very fact that they are referred to by honorifics such as 'Highness' or 'Majesty' turns my stomach. They are flesh and blood just like any other person and no more worthy of respect or honour than any other person.

    If it doesn't interest certain miserable people then they don't need to post or have digs. Simple.
    Yes, clearly anyone who doesn't feel the need to fawn all over the royal family must be miserable.

    People who go out of their way to have a moan when a young British couple announce they are bringing a new person into the world, Royal or not, are miserable yes.
    Utter bollocks! What about people who go out of their way to announce how delighted they are at the impending birth of someone they will never meet to parents that they have never and will never meet and do not know in any way? What are they then?

    They're not as miserable.
    Sad perhaps, but not miserable.

  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    edited September 2014
    Posting on something you have no interest in for the sake of moaning - that is sad (and miserable)
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    cafctom said:

    Posting on something you have no interest in for the sake of moaning - that is sad (and miserable)

    Ah yes. We're clearly only allowed to post on threads where we are in agreement with the original post. No debate. No conflicting opinion. Everyone's a winner! Hurrah!!

  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    Rizzo what are you doing? You're not allowed to post in this thread, you sad miserable git.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    colthe3rd said:

    Rizzo what are you doing? You're not allowed to post in this thread, you sad miserable git.

    Solly

  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    edited September 2014
    Its ok Rizzo, you're not the only miserable (old?) git - who's not allowed any opinions that differ from the happy people.

    Now, that national anthem of ours......
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    You mean Jerusalem?
  • Addicted
    Addicted Posts: 2,804
    image
  • PL54
    PL54 Posts: 10,757
    SE3Addick said:

    These two are my royal babies!! I'm a lapsed member and now back for general Charlton chat!

    "Nice one SE3" - however I have never met you, probably never will and don't know you in any way, so ignore me.
  • colthe3rd said:

    You mean Jerusalem?

    I really think we should use the Sex Pistols version - would make International football matches so much more interesting.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486

    colthe3rd said:

    You mean Jerusalem?

    I really think we should use the Sex Pistols version - would make International football matches so much more interesting.
    I don't, most overrated band of all time.
  • colthe3rd said:

    colthe3rd said:

    You mean Jerusalem?

    I really think we should use the Sex Pistols version - would make International football matches so much more interesting.
    I don't, most overrated band of all time.
    I remember listening to Nicky Horne on Capital saying he would never play a Sex Pistols track as Punk was shiite - two years later he he was saying they were one of the best bands on the planet.Must admit, took a while for me to get into them - but they were formidable.
  • PL54 said:

    SE3Addick said:

    These two are my royal babies!! I'm a lapsed member and now back for general Charlton chat!

    "Nice one SE3" - however I have never met you, probably never will and don't know you in any way, so ignore me.
    Fair comment! There are around 15,000 Charlton fans I never will meet or speak to every other week I'm at the Valley.

    Something quite exciting about putting my boys in their first kit! Just waiting for them to grow into this years kit!
  • Saga Lout
    Saga Lout Posts: 6,845
    thenewbie said:

    Harry must be dead pleased... no way is he getting anywhere near the throne now!

    Imagine having James Hewitt's son on the throne!