Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Sheffield Wed v Charlton

For those who made the long wet trip to Hillsborough, your marks please:

Hamer
Solly
Morrison
Cort
Seaborne
Wilson
Frimpong
Jackson
Kerkar
Kermorgant
Haynes
Fuller

Hulse n/a
Green n/a

Comments

  • edited December 2012
    Hamer 6
    Solly 5
    Morrison 5
    Cort 5
    Seaborne 4
    Wilson 5
    Frimpong
    Jackson 6
    Kerkar 3
    Kermorgant 3 why is he playing ahead of Hulse.
    Haynes 4
    Fuller 4
  • edited December 2012
    Hamer 7
    Solly 7
    Cort 6
    Morrison 6
    Seabourne 6
    Wilson 7
    Jackson 7
    Frimpong 6
    Kerker 2
    Haynes 6
    Kermogant 5

    Green n/a
    Fuller 7
    Hulse n/a
  • Hamer 7
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6
    Cort 7
    Seaborne 5
    Wilson 7
    Frimpong 6
    Jackson 4.5
    Kerkar 3
    Kermorgant 3
    Haynes 7
    Fuller 6

  • Hamer 6
    Solly 7
    Morrison 5.5
    Cort 6.5
    Seaborne 6
    Wilson 6.5
    Frimpong 6.5
    Jackson 6
    Kerkar 4
    Kermorgant 5
    Haynes 5
    Fuller 6

    Hulse n/a
    Green n/a
  • Hamer 6
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Seaborne 5
    Wilson 6
    Frimpong 5
    Jackson 5
    Kerkar 4
    Kermorgant 5
    Haynes 6
    Fuller 6

  • Hamer 6
    Solly 6.5
    Morrison 6
    Cort 7
    Seaborne 6
    Wilson 6
    Frimpong 6
    Jackson 6.5
    Kerkar 5
    Kermorgant 6
    Haynes 5
    Fuller 6

    Hulse n/a
    Green n/a
  • Hamer 6
    Solly 6
    Morrison 5
    Cort 6
    Seaborne 5
    Wilson 7
    Frimpong 4
    Jackson 6
    Kerkar 6
    Kermorgant 3
    Haynes 4

    Fuller 6
  • Blimey, it really was as bad as the commentary suggested!
  • 2 for Kerkar and 3 for Kermorgant?

    They must have deliberately scored an own goal each, conceded a pen and sent off for fighting each other
  • Oggy Red said:

    2 for Kerkar and 3 for Kermorgant?

    They must have deliberately scored an own goal each, conceded a pen and sent off for fighting each other

    Kerker would have to of either got into a goalscoring position or made some sort of effort to make physical contact with the opposition, he shyed away from everything today and was lucky to get a two. He was given a 2 because he actually turned away from goal on virtually every occassion he was given the ball and was fairly accurate in finding Seabourne behind him. Apart from that he did nothing that you would expect from a half decent left midfielder, he was truely shocking and looked liked he wanted to be somewhere else.
  • Sponsored links:


  • please please please, chris stop picking KERKAR
  • Sorry Oggster Kermorgant was entirely ineffective and probably went down a mark for me undeservedly on his part for being out there in the first place. Rob Hulse must be a right so and so in training.

    Thought Kerkar was ok to be honest. He set up the disallowed 'goal', which danny haynes' air kicking apart was about as far as our tactics got us.
  • Agree Kermogsnt struggling at this level. Not the player he was last? Kerkari have given up hoping there is more to him than what he has thus far delivered. Not s lot!
  • Thanks, ISaw. Appreciate you explaining how you saw it.

    A 2 for Kerkar still is a hugely low mark for a player - he really has to be a total disgrace to the shirt and his team mates to get that sort of low mark.

    Despite what you say No 1, I still find it hard to believe.
  • Kerkar was not that awful. Did you see that bloke who played part of one game (burnley?), Eggybread or something. Kerkar is not that bad.
  • Fair enough Oggy, but I gave it as I saw it and most of it relates to what he didn't or chose not to do. Turning his back on their players in possesion and token star jumps yards away from an aerial challenge are aspects where Kerker quite frankly does my head in. Add to that his reluctance to be positive when in possession and you have one fairly ineffective wide left midfielder. I'm not one for slaughtering players usually, but one decent pass in the sixty minutes that he was allowed, not enough. Maybe someone else can explain why they gave him a 3,4 or 5 ?

  • Hamer 5. Needs to catching crosses. Weak punch set up the goal.
    Solly 7. Really gonna miss the little fella when he goes.
    Morrison 5. Gave ball away to set up a chance first half and kicked ball into touch at the death when we were trying to level thus wasting the added time. Why do that?
    Cort 6. Did what Leon does.
    Seaborne 5. Not looking the quickest of left backs.
    Wilson 7. Energetic and a threat.
    Frimpong 5. Not all that energetic or a threat. One eye on Africa maybe?
    Jackson 5. I feel he needs to be rested.
    Kerkar 5. Not very effective. We don't have other wide left options = problem.
    Kermorgant 4. Anonymous and ineffective. Why was he left on for 90 mins?
    Haynes 6. We should have been able to exploit his pace better today.
    Fuller 6. We need him fit enough to start.

    Hulse n/a why bring on for just ten mins?
    Green n/a. Why bring on for just ten mins?


  • Hamer 6
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6
    Cort 7
    Seaborne 5
    Wilson 7
    Frimpong 5
    Jackson 5
    Kerkar 5
    Kermorgant 6
    Haynes 6
    Fuller 6
  • Oggy Red said:

    2 for Kerkar and 3 for Kermorgant?

    They must have deliberately scored an own goal each, conceded a pen and sent off for fighting each other

    Did you go to the game ?
  • Hamer - 6.5
    Solly - 7
    Cort - 6.5
    Morrison - 5
    Seabourne - 5
    Wilson - 6
    Frimpong - 5
    Jackson - 6.5
    Kerkar - 4
    Kermorgant - 5
    Haynes - 5.5

    Why does Danny Green not start?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Because Wilson is the better all round player.
  • Hamer - 7.0
    Solly - 7.5
    Morrison - 5.5
    Cort - 7.0
    Seaborne - 5.5
    Wilson - 6.5
    Frimpong - 5.5
    Jackson - 5.5
    Kerkar - 3.5
    Kermorgant - 5.5
    Haynes - 5.5
    Fuller - 6.5
  • Hamer - 7.0
    Solly - 7.5
    Morrison - 5.5
    Cort - 7.0
    Seaborne - 5.5
    Wilson - 6.5
    Frimpong - 5.5
    Jackson - 5.5
    Kerkar - 3.5
    Kermorgant - 5.5
    Haynes - 5.5
    Fuller - 6.5

    Did you find a decent pub ?
  • Hamer 6
    Solly 7.5
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6.5
    Seabourne 6
    Wilson 6.5
    Frimpong 5.5
    Jackson 5.5
    Kerkar 6
    Kermorgant 5
    Haynes 6
    Fuller 5.5
  • Hamer - 7.0
    Solly - 7.5
    Morrison - 5.5
    Cort - 7.0
    Seaborne - 5.5
    Wilson - 6.5
    Frimpong - 5.5
    Jackson - 5.5
    Kerkar - 3.5
    Kermorgant - 5.5
    Haynes - 5.5
    Fuller - 6.5

    Did you find a decent pub ?
    Alright CE? Didn't need to in the end as train was held up. Managed to get to the ground just in time which is better than my dad who made it just for the last 20. 8 hours travelling for 20 minutes of hoofball. Pretty bad away day! Have a good christmas mate.
  • For those who made the long wet trip to Hillsborough, your marks please:

    Hamer 7
    Solly 8
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Seaborne 5
    Wilson 7
    Frimpong 5
    Jackson 5
    Kerkar 4
    Kermorgant 7
    Haynes 6
    Fuller 6

    Hulse n/a
    Green n/a

  • Hamer - 7.0
    Solly - 7.5
    Morrison - 5.5
    Cort - 7.0
    Seaborne - 5.5
    Wilson - 6.5
    Frimpong - 5.5
    Jackson - 5.5
    Kerkar - 3.5
    Kermorgant - 5.5
    Haynes - 5.5
    Fuller - 6.5

    Did you find a decent pub ?
    Alright CE? Didn't need to in the end as train was held up. Managed to get to the ground just in time which is better than my dad who made it just for the last 20. 8 hours travelling for 20 minutes of hoofball. Pretty bad away day! Have a good christmas mate.
    That's one of the reasons I didn't bother, as the same happened last season. I think we caught the 11.20 & only reached Leicester by 2.15pm. Gave up & got back to St Pancras by 5pm having see **** all.

    I think if we'd carried on, we may have got there for the last 10 mins, getting a cab from the station & then assuming you'd be able to get in.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!