Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK - Millwall 0-0 Charlton plus THE PROMORELEGATOR

Many thanks to the 51 Lifers who survived the New Den and sent in their marks, also thanks to the Millwall OS which gave the away attendance, unlike the CAFC OS which didn't.

Here are the stats:https://us.v-cdn.net/5000498/uploads/FileUpload/7b/9f4293a52909e5c2234258fcb81990.pdf

image

Comments

  • LL - think the minutes played for Kerkar and Green are incorrect?

    Cheers for the comprehensive stats as always though mate.
  • BB - thanks, Kerkar should be 73 minutes but Green is correct, as his replacement, at 20 minutes. Kerkar's accumulated minutes is correct as my mistake was only in copying it onto the stats form, seventy three and ninety three ........!
  • Someone else's minutes are wrong, then, or did we play the last 12 mins with 12 men?!

    Interesting as always, LL - thanks.
  • Someone else's minutes are wrong, then, or did we play the last 12 mins with 12 men?!


    Interesting as always, LL - thanks.

    Don't think so Weegie as there are 10 players on 93 minutes, with Yann on 81, one of the 10 is Kerkar who should be on 73 which makes 9 plus 2 subs - or am I getting even more senile than I thought :)
  • Sorry - didn;t read the Kerkar comments properly. Once that is adjusted, it's all fine!
  • Needs more graphs ;-)
  • colthe3rd said:

    Needs more graphs ;-)

    no I'll leave the graphs to you, but I think the whole Reading thing is being blown out of proportion as this season there are so many teams in a similar position that the competition for a play off place is stronger than ever.
    But then again what's wrong with a bit dreaming.
    COYA
  • Don't worry I've got something to go in that thread, be up at lunch. I agree about Reading though, would have to be a ridiculously good run of games to match what they did.
  • 6 clean sheets in 20 games is a good stat.
    2nd in form table for last 6 games - also pleasing
  • No way did we have a shot on target, did we?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Nicholas said:

    No way did we have a shot on target, did we?

    and official answer is "yes" according to the football league who get their information from the press association, apparently?
  • edited December 2012
    Ok cheers, Must of been drunker then I thought :)
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!