I counted three pen claims, two against Cort and one against Pritchard. All turned down.
As for the inane posts here from Davali and soapy jones about News Shopper being biased towards Millwall, there is no bias as we cover both Charlton and Millwall.
It is funny, the one thing Palace and Millwall fans always accuse me of is being biased towards Charlton.
I counted three pen claims, two against Cort and one against Pritchard. All turned down.
As for the inane posts here from Davali and soapy jones about News Shopper being biased towards Millwall, there is no bias as we cover both Charlton and Millwall.
It is funny, the one thing Palace and Millwall fans always accuse me of is being biased towards Charlton.
Rag. There you go precious another inane one for you.
You were precocious and inane with your first post soapy, so hardly a case of 'another inane one' from you : )
Joking aside (and I am joking with the above comment before you go off on one) the thing with derby games is that any report is always going to be open to a claim of bias depending on how you read it.
My honest opinion is Millwall can consider themselves hard done by not to have won yesterday based on the performance they put in.
They created the better of what few chances there were on the day but ultimately couldn't take any of them - their fault, not Charlton's.
The match report isn't a criticism of Charlton, who defended very well and will look at it as a point which was very hard earned.
It was an excellent point from a Charlton perspective IM precocious O.
That was pretty much CP's view of it afterwards as well.
To be honest, the NS means nothing to any Charlton supporter. Not sure why you bother covering us. Do you sponsor the club or anything? If not, why not stick to covering Millwall, or do their fans have a similar low opinion of your rag.
Comments
;o)
As for the inane posts here from Davali and soapy jones about News Shopper being biased towards Millwall, there is no bias as we cover both Charlton and Millwall.
It is funny, the one thing Palace and Millwall fans always accuse me of is being biased towards Charlton.
Joking aside (and I am joking with the above comment before you go off on one) the thing with derby games is that any report is always going to be open to a claim of bias depending on how you read it.
My honest opinion is Millwall can consider themselves hard done by not to have won yesterday based on the performance they put in.
They created the better of what few chances there were on the day but ultimately couldn't take any of them - their fault, not Charlton's.
The match report isn't a criticism of Charlton, who defended very well and will look at it as a point which was very hard earned.
It was an excellent point from a Charlton perspective IM precocious O.
That was pretty much CP's view of it afterwards as well.
None of them were pens, the last Cort one was probably the most controversial but even that one was probably ball to hand.
Watching a match and being 'pwoppa norty' don't really mix.