Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Six Minutes Added Time

lordromfordlordromford
in General Charlton
For the life of me, I can't see where the ref got 6 minutes from in that second half.
Three goals, Haynes injury and the substitutions would surely only make 3 or so.
Timewasting went on, but wasn't outrageous, so I just can't see it - especially as we've seen far more time wasting, subs etc and only 3 or 4 minutes added on in games in the past.
I don't know - maybe I've missed or forgotten something?

So, serious question - maybe to any refs out there - how did he come up with 6 minutes?
«1

Comments

  • Fanny FanackapanFanny Fanackapan
    Can't believe this hasn't already been raised on here !!!

    Everyone seated around me was gobsmacked...Anyone closer to SCP see his reaction ?
  • Mendonca In AsdasMendonca In Asdas
    He spent at least 6 minutes pulling cards out of his pocket....
  • Weegie AddickWeegie Addick
    Meant to be 30 seconds per goal isn't it, plus subs etc?
  • BolderhumphreyreidBolderhumphreyreid
    Agreed.

    First half, 4 goals and no injuries = 2 mins. Therefore it's 30 seconds per goal.

    Second half, 3 goals, an injury and a few subs. Should have been 3 mins max!

    Love the fact we're discussing this after a great win!
  • NicholasNicholas
    I was quite excited when he put 6 minutes, I really thought we was going to score 6 as I have never seen us score that many. How I nearly cried when it went 5-4. Only Charlton can do that.
  • killerandflashkillerandflash
    Bolderhumphreyreid said:

    Agreed.

    First half, 4 goals and no injuries = 2 mins. Therefore it's 30 seconds per goal.

    Second half, 3 goals, an injury and a few subs. Should have been 3 mins max!

    Love the fact we're discussing this after a great win!

    If Cardiff had nicked an equaliser, we'd have been discussing it A LOT more.
  • lordromfordlordromford
    Bolderhumphreyreid said:

    Love the fact we're discussing this after a great win!

    I know - It was a great win and I'm in a great mood! So not really moaning!
    Also, like Nicholas, when 6 mins came up, I wasn't concerned, but hoped for another home goal - but even at the time my immediate reaction was 'What the f***?'
  • JTJT
    Fanny Fanackapan said:

    Can't believe this hasn't already been raised on here !!!

    Everyone seated around me was gobsmacked...Anyone closer to SCP see his reaction ?

    He had his head down just staring

  • paulbaconsarniepaulbaconsarnie
    wasn't surprised. he must have had it in his head we were time wasting from when solly and morrison kicked the ball away 80 yards. he was itching to book hamer (who was trying his patience to perfection).
    from 45 mins - 90 mins if you add 30 seconds for each goal and substitution = 3 minutes, add 30 seconds for each stop in play for the 6 bookings = another 3 minutes.
    add to that from 90 mins+ the 2 goals and 1 sub i'd imagine he played over 7.5 minutes.
  • northstandstevenorthstandsteve
    plus time Haynes spent being stretched out for his cramp, when you look at it in the cold light of day he probably got it right.
  • Sponsored links:


  • oohaahmortimeroohaahmortimer
    6 minutes doug e fresh you're on was about right (only cos we won)
  • PragueAddickPragueAddick
    if football was run by normal people who cared about customers you would have:

    a stadium clock wired up to the 4th official, which stops when time is added on, like in ice hockey; an automatic electronic whistle which then sounds bang on 90.00, and:
    a clear statement at the beginning of the seas on about standard add-ons such as 30 seconds for a goal or a sub.

    Can anybody give me a good reason why it should not be done like that?
  • tangoflashtangoflash
    Ref had us down for a draw on his pools coupon...........FACT!!!!
  • daveaddickdaveaddick
    Bloody ridiculous it was never 6 minutes the Haynes cramp didn't take up any time as they pulled him off the pitch almost immediately. Luckily it worked out fine but when you are having a run of bad luck this kind of thing tens to bite your arse (which is nearly did) sometimes officials havea lot to answer for.
  • MortimericianMortimerician
    Agree with Dave. There's plenty games where there are 6 subs a couple of goals and lots of timewasting and a 3 goes up. There was very little messing around and Haynes injury didn't waste any match time, the ref was busy booking Hulse while he was being helped off.
  • smsm
    I think the ref recognised that true Charlton fans only truly appreciate victories which are achieved after overcoming adversity and a couple of near heart attacks!
  • AddickFC81AddickFC81
    He got it out of his backside.
  • ShagShag
    northstandsteve said:

    plus time Haynes spent being stretched out for his cramp, when you look at it in the cold light of day he probably got it right.

    He did n't

  • daveaddickdaveaddick
    Correct shag the ref was booking Hulse and by the time he had finished Haynes was off and BWP was on
  • killerandflashkillerandflash
    There was very little timewasting, as we were 3 goals up and on top, and during normal time were cruising to victory. If we had been 1-0 up, I'm sure we would have timewasted a lot more!
  • Sponsored links:


  • floydroadfaithfullfloydroadfaithfull
    The ref-
    Card happy c**k
    End of
  • daveaddickdaveaddick
    Succinct Floyd....also correct
  • redmanredman
    never seem to get 6 minutes when we're losing by the odd goal no matter how much time wasting, how many injuries or how many subs made.

    Also there is no such rule of 30 seconds a sub, it depends how long it takes. 30 seconds is an average. There were only 4 anyway as we had only made 2 and they only did it twice (2 being at the same time)
    No time should be added for goals except in the case of over zealous and long celebrations unless they have changed the rules recently
  • mid_life_crisismid_life_crisis
    It was a joke wasn't it. Haynes was off the pitch in no time.
    As has been said, you get games with long injury breaks and proper time wasting and the board goes up with 3 or 4.
    6 was a complete farce.
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    Neither side wasted any time - certainly less than you get in most games. He played 2 minutes additional time for the first half - 30 secs for each goal so effectively no added time in that. Refs do confuse me!
  • RizzoRizzo
    As I said in the post-match thread, he seemed determined to play until Cardiff equalised. I remember a similar game against Villa many years ago which ended 4-4 (I think) and I'm convinced would still be going on today if Villa hadn't scored the 4th.
  • northstandstevenorthstandsteve
    Shag said:

    northstandsteve said:

    plus time Haynes spent being stretched out for his cramp, when you look at it in the cold light of day he probably got it right.


    He did n't

    LOL piss off

  • ChippycafcChippycafc
    I have been to games where players have been stretchered off and only a few mins added , the 6 minutes added was quite ridiculous.
  • Sonicstud85Sonicstud85
    it was because at 5-2 we were singing "we want six"
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    Leicester ref did similar this season. We didn't miss out in both games, but I think there is a case to be answered here.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!