Reasons threads get closed

Off_it

I have undertaken a not very lengthy, not very scientific, not very actual study of why threads get closed on here and can confirm the results as follows;

Politics 32%
Rangers/Celtic related issues 28%
Religion 20%
Standing at away games 10%
Other 10%

nolly

why us?

Brendan_O_Connell

Maybe Lancashire Lad can do a Statbank Closethreadometer to measure how many and why threads are closed?

Absurdistan

How much of the other is sex?

Off_it

nolly said:

why us?

Cos we're ere lad. There's no-one else. Just us.

Off_it

Absurdistan said:

How much of the other is sex?

Sex is a bit of the other.

Richard J

Its sad that the Old Firm has such a grip on our community.

I think it is depressing the Elliott thread got highjacked .I opened the discussion on Friday following a Twitter feed to the Mirror article about an ex Charlton player who might come over to be Chairman ,yet the debate moved on to Paul's time at Celtic and alleged remarks he made about racism north of the border. Why ?

Off_it

Richard J said:

Its sad that the Old Firm has such a grip on our community.

I think it is depressing the Elliott thread got highjacked .I opened the discussion on Friday following a Twitter feed to the Mirror article about an ex Charlton player who might come over to be Chairman ,yet the debate moved on to Paul's time at Celtic and alleged remarks he made about racism north of the border. Why ?

Sorry mate, but this isn't a thread for that - otherwise we'll just go round in circles again.

dave85

i like going round in circles. each circle gets more aggressive and irrational to the point of no one knows what the conversation started over.

ShootersHillGuru

I quite liked the fact it just vanished. Plus I got to be called a wanker.

aliwibble

SHG, you're a bloke aren't you? Are you really trying to tell us that you don't? :-)

Richard J

Off_it said:

Richard J said:

Its sad that the Old Firm has such a grip on our community.

I think it is depressing the Elliott thread got highjacked .I opened the discussion on Friday following a Twitter feed to the Mirror article about an ex Charlton player who might come over to be Chairman ,yet the debate moved on to Paul's time at Celtic and alleged remarks he made about racism north of the border. Why ?

Sorry mate, but this isn't a thread for that - otherwise we'll just go round in circles again.

Don't want to go round in circles just talk about Charlton on a Charlton forum , I like the fact this community goes into other subjects ,I just wish people would be more respectful to each other .

Off_it

ShootersHillGuru said:

I quite liked the fact it just vanished. Plus I got to be called a wanker.

Stick around mate, the night is young!
;o)

Uboat

It's the anticipation of the closure that I enjoy. Once certain characters turn up, you know it's only a matter of time. Do you think the same thing happens when they turn up at parties?

Baldybonce

Don't want to go round in circles just talk about Charlton on a Charlton forum , I like the fact this community goes into other subjects ,I just wish people would be more respectful to each other .



I'd agree with this, i had a thread pulled about 15 minutes after i started it in the week but posts abusing each other stick around.

Lewis Coaches

A circle only has oneside.

ShootersHillGuru

Baldybonce said:

Don't want to go round in circles just talk about Charlton on a Charlton forum , I like the fact this community goes into other subjects ,I just wish people would be more respectful to each other .

I'd agree with this, i had a thread pulled about 15 minutes after i started it in the week but posts abusing each other stick around.

Can I just add that me being called a wanker has nothing to do with this abusing each other ;0

Wheresmeticket?

A*****hole.

Off_it

Lewis Coaches said:

A circle only has oneside.

Hasn't it got an inside and and outside?

gilbertfilbert

Ah, but the line separating the two is infinitely thin.

aliwibble

Lewis Coaches said:

A circle only has oneside.

Travis?

nth_london_addick

There's 3 points to every triangle

Addickted

I'd rather see posters 'yellow carded' than the threads themselves closed.

Uboat

Addickted said:

I'd rather see posters 'yellow carded' than the threads themselves closed.

Too subjective.

oohaahmortimer

Rangers/Celtic related issues 28%

it's just so boreoff.com weird that there's so many overly bothered about it on here
they must have their own sites to spurt out all the chuffingtons that goes with the territory up there

AFKABartram

I'll reopen the Elliott one tomorrow once I've taken out the rangers, celtic, racism, abuse etc. Just to subjective and taking it off at a tangent.

kentaddick

as soon as thatcher is mentioned in any thread it should be closed (even in political threads, over 20 years ago now, getting less and less relevant everyday) since some posters seem to have unquenchable thirst to splash bile all over their computer screens (on both sides, anti and pro) the thread spirals out of control.

So, yet again thatcher is the reason for all our problems

Lewis Coaches

ALIWIBBLE...correct

PL54

Off_it said:

I have undertaken a not very lengthy, not very scientific, not very actual study of why threads get closed on here and can confirm the results as follows;

Politics 32%
Rangers/Celtic related issues 28%
Religion 20%
Standing at away games 10%
Other 10%

Aren't the first 3 the same thing ?

Bedsaddick

kentaddick said:

as soon as thatcher is mentioned in any thread it should be closed (even in political threads, over 20 years ago now, getting less and less relevant everyday) since some posters seem to have unquenchable thirst to splash bile all over their computer screens (on both sides, anti and pro) the thread spirals out of control.

So, yet again thatcher is the reason for all our problems

Got my party outfit ready for Trafalgar square for the momentous day.

SE10

Bit disturbing that people would celebrate the death of an old lady...