Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Slater statements thread

edited July 2012 in General Charlton
What happened to this discussion.
«1

Comments

  • it got moved offline to tidy up a couple of posts, and in doing so i've discovered a glitch with the offline set up which means i can't currently re-instate it again.

    Been one of those days...
  • Became a non discussive discussion.
  • I was on page 12 of reading through the whole thing...
  • it got moved offline to tidy up a couple of posts, and in doing so i've discovered a glitch with the offline set up which means i can't currently re-instate it again.

    Been one of those days...
    Oh if I had a £ for every time I heard that one.....:-)
  • Big brother is watching us... ;-)
  • Cash is king.
  • I smell a rat here. Very controversial thread suddenly lost. Oh yeah. Who's paying you off AFKA ? ;0)
  • Hmmmmmm JFK, Moon landings, 9/11. Any more conspiracy theories? ; )
  • Hmmmmmm JFK, Moon landings, 9/11. Any more conspiracy theories? ; )
    The thread disappeared just after I posted a response to a member called 'kafka'..........
  • what did you do that for?
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited July 2012
    So where did this Kevin Cash name pop up from? Doesn't seem like a great character, judging by what's written on him online Charlton loves you, please come back
  • Been sunk too.

    Take it my question earlier will remain unanswered then.

    Odd.
  • what was your question rct
  • edited July 2012
    Just asked Airman what if any developments there had been in the last 3 days after he had posted his panic- inducing comment at the weekend which along with Henry's insightful summary appeared that we were up shit creek.

    Am just surprised at how quiet it has all gone on that front if what was said was true.

    And i take by the fact it's been sunk and will move down the page despite new posts suggests we should all forget about it and put it down to experience.
  • and if now it is now known that all is ok wouldnt you think that someone in the know would post that,or have i missed something
  • and if now it is now known that all is ok wouldnt you think that someone in the know would post that,or have i missed something
    You'd think so. I must've missed it too.

  • The truth is out there somewhere........
  • Been sunk too.

    Someone's trying to tell you something

  • RCT, lock all your windows & doors & do not open your front door to anyone.
  • RCT, lock all your windows & doors & do not open your front door to anyone.
    Crumbs ... thought i'd stumbled into John Grisham film for a minute!

  • Sponsored links:


  • As stated, it needed some pruning because of a WUM and will be back. No conspiracy, just good, old fashioned technological hijinks. It will be back.
  • That and the Russians that have been following me for the last 2 weeks talking to their wrists

  • Its all OK. There was whispers of the army being called in under the cover of guarding the Olympics but since that hasn't happened were all safe.
  • It's all a laugh joking about it all now but sorry for not seeing the funny side of a senior club employee causing a shit storm and mass concern on here by posting a statement like he did then disappearing in the ether leaving those of us not ITK to speculate as to whether well have a club next month based on such supposedly reliable information.

    Still no answer to my question then Airman or anyone ITK?
  • I personally think Airman had had a few savingon blancs before he put that on the other night.
  • It's a cliqustery
  • RCT, I'm not sure why you are asking.

    You didn't believe what Prague, Plaaayer, Rothko, NLA were saying and you were quite dismissive of their motives. It was the same with Airman Brown.

    Yet you seek more info from them. Do you want an apology or do you just want confirmation that you were right all along.

    AB posted on here yesterday about other subjects. I have no idea if has been warned off or if he just doesn't have any new news. Either way you won't listen to what he says unless that is "it was all a wind up/mistake."
  • edited July 2012
    RCT, I'm not sure why you are asking.

    You didn't believe what Prague, Plaaayer, Rothko, NLA were saying and you were quite dismissive of their motives. It was the same with Airman Brown.

    Yet you seek more info from them
    . Do you want an apology or do you just want confirmation that you were right all along.

    AB posted on here yesterday about other subjects. I have no idea if has been warned off or if he just doesn't have any new news. Either way you won't listen to what he says unless that is "it was all a wind up/mistake."
    That's not correct and I think you have got your wires crossed somewhere. If you read what I actually posted on the deleted thread you will plainly see that I said numerous times whilst I had been initially sceptical (and posted so) after assessing the reliability and credibility of those who posted (ie those you name) I came to the conclusion that there must be a lot of truth in it but as those (including yourself) were credible posters who I couldnt see a reason as to why they would post something without being 100% sure of the facts.

    I even stated that to another poster who was questioning whether it was true or rumours by saying that the credibility of the posters here and elsewhere meant that it was likely to be true. So apologies but your first sentence above isn't the full picture and pretty wide of the mark of what I posted in entirity on the disappeared thread and if reinstated youll see that.

    Henry please dont patronise mewith that last sentence. I'm confident I know what I'll "listen" to and more than capable of making my own mind up in what I believe more than you speculate as how I'll react to an answer.

    I asked a simple question as to have then been any developments in the few days since a senior club official and credible posters said we are in dire straits?

    I think it is perfectly reasonable to ask such a question in light of the understandable concern on here and amongst wider Charlton supporters in light of what has been posted by those with strong links and self complained links inside the club.

    Why has this thread been sunk? Is it not for debate any longer?

    If that is unreasonable question then I'll acknowledge the forum as a place to post about top 5 lists and problems on the trains but can't take it seriously as a Charlton forum when the biggest issue post takeover regarding the club (and one that supposedly threatens our very existence) seems to have been swept under the carpet or at least gone off the radar.

    You have obviously stronger links into the club and contacts so you are more than likely abreast of what is or isnt going on. I and many others dont and am just asking those who happily posted their concerns at the weekends (particularly a senior club employee) what the score is now. And yes it has left me now sceptical again as it seems to have become a non issue on here for a problem supposedly so significant.


  • RCT, I'm not sure why you are asking.

    You didn't believe what Prague, Plaaayer, Rothko, NLA were saying and you were quite dismissive of their motives. It was the same with Airman Brown.

    Yet you seek more info from them
    . Do you want an apology or do you just want confirmation that you were right all along.

    AB posted on here yesterday about other subjects. I have no idea if has been warned off or if he just doesn't have any new news. Either way you won't listen to what he says unless that is "it was all a wind up/mistake."
    That's not correct and I think you have got your wires crossed somewhere. If you read what I actually posted on the deleted thread you will plainly see that I said numerous times whilst I had been initially sceptical (and posted so) after assessing the reliability and credibility of those who posted (ie those you name) I came to the conclusion that there must be a lot of truth in it but as those (including yourself) were credible posters who I couldnt see a reason as to why they would post something without being 100% sure of the facts.

    I even stated that to another poster who was questioning whether it was true or rumours by saying that the credibility of the posters here and elsewhere meant that it was likely to be true. So apologies but your first sentence above isn't the full picture and pretty wide of the mark of what I posted in entirity on the disappeared thread and if reinstated youll see that.

    Henry please dont patronise mewith that last sentence. I'm confident I know what I'll "listen" to and more than capable of making my own mind up in what I believe more than you speculate as how I'll react to an answer.

    I asked a simple question as to have then been any developments in the few days since a senior club official and credible posters said we are in dire straits?

    I think it is perfectly reasonable to ask such a question in light of the understandable concern on here and amongst wider Charlton supporters in light of what has been posted by those with strong links and self complained links inside the club.

    Why has this thread been sunk? Is it not for debate any longer?

    If that is unreasonable question then I'll acknowledge the forum as a place to post about top 5 lists and problems on the trains but can't take it seriously as a Charlton forum when the biggest issue post takeover regarding the club (and one that supposedly threatens our very existence) seems to have been swept under the carpet or at least gone off the radar.

    You have obviously stronger links into the club and contacts so you are more than likely abreast of what is or isnt going on. I and many others dont and am just asking those who happily posted their concerns at the weekends (particularly a senior club employee) what the score is now. And yes it has left me now sceptical again as it seems to have become a non issue on here for a problem supposedly so significant.


    Very well put RCT. I said at the time that airmans post was cryptic. And you only have to look at the many different interpretations of what was said to see what I meant.
  • RCT, I'm not sure why you are asking.

    You didn't believe what Prague, Plaaayer, Rothko, NLA were saying and you were quite dismissive of their motives. It was the same with Airman Brown.

    Yet you seek more info from them. Do you want an apology or do you just want confirmation that you were right all along.

    AB posted on here yesterday about other subjects. I have no idea if has been warned off or if he just doesn't have any new news. Either way you won't listen to what he says unless that is "it was all a wind up/mistake."
    I didnt believe it either, or certainly not in the interpretation it morphed itself into, but perhaps I'm burying my head in the sand

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!