Hope there isnt a thread on this already if there is you can remove this. Saw in the south east London press today that apparently we snubbed a move for Rivaldo back in November when his agent came and offered him to us. I know he is getting old and is 40 now but possibly it could of been a half decent signing, considering the year before he was still scoring goals for Sao Paulo? Just wondered what you all thought? .... Also could of possibly brought us a few fans from around the world who will follow the Brasilian world cup winning legend and possibly spread are name more worldwide??
0
Comments
Seems we said no most likely for the reasons the Spanner said.
enough said.
Shirt sales would have gone through the roof, ticket sales would have gone up, meaning more money for the club?
Then even if he is shit and cant hack or doesn't show a level of commitment then we just release him from his contract at the end of the season a bit like we did with John Barnes!?
How many wallys would've gone out & bought a Rivaldo shirt?
& why would you risk signing a player whose heart & attitude may not be right, which then unsettles a promising team on a great run topping the table?
.
Rivaldo has probably never heard of Charlton.
Hate to say but me too.
It's the sort of thing Palace would do eg Edgar Davids.
Team first, second and third, shirt sales a very distant 127th