There's a lot of talk about the toll of two matches a week. I'm sorry, but I don't really get it. Just look at tennis players who might have to play four or five hours one day, then four or five again the next day - in an individual sport that is as mentally demanding as it is physically demanding. And their season runs from January to November. Footballers - even third division ones - are professional athletes, and should be able to manage to play 95 minutes on a Saturday and Tuesday for a month without looking "leggy" or knackered. Am I missing something?
0
Comments
The only difference I can see mentally is that tennis players don't receive the crowd abuse and hostility that footballers do as a general rule. Football is a game of confidence and if, for whatever reason, players feel unappreciated then that confidence can be affected. Hamer being exhibit A p'raps (as Curbs would say).
Can't remember the last time I saw a tennis player get a whack on the ankle playing a baseline rally!
tongue firmly in cheek.
Was that the only reason we lost so badly? IMHO no but it may have been a factor
I certainly don't so congratulations if you do!
And the fact that there is no midweek match at last will give a chance for niggles to heal and an edge to our energy, which has been lacking.
And I bet most manage to be at 100% for three hours during their working week, which is all we ask of footballers.
Sports people being tired doesn't mean they can't so the job, but it does mean they won't be at their best. Comparing with people doing 'proper jobs' old fashioned mining is of course much harder, where firemen spend much of their time waiting around, so normally get time to recharge the batteries between jobs.