Having had a spell playing improved at 4-5-1, but delivering few goals, how do you see it going forward for the rest of the season ?
With baby Bent hopefully back (i'm still not 100% convinced we'll see him starting against Wham), Marcus seems to have earned a right to a partnership. But who does that leave out in the midfield ?
Song and ZZ have played themselves into consideration, Reid and Thomas are good options on the left, while Romm. Oh i won't go there, but he provides balance for some.
How do you see it ?
0
Comments
Carson, Young, HH, ELK, Thatch, Song, Faye, Holland, one of Romm/JT/Reid/Ambrose, Bent, Bent
(maybe this is even 4-2-1-1-2)
Away we should stick with 4-5-1 apart from maybe Watford with 2 of the four and D.Bent up front.
S.
We should only be playing 4-5-1 in games that we would expect to lose (like the games we have just got out the way) as the 4-5-1 gives that extra defensive stability to hold the opposition off whilst perhaps grabbing a goal on the counter.
Rather see us stick to 4-5-1 when DB is back.
I would deffo have JFH on the bench - he may be of some use on the pitch, but more importantly, it would stop him eating all the pies on matchdays...
I'm really struggling to see how Reid is going to fit into this, or get himself back up to match fitness
Romm always looks better away from home in that system cos he can turn 4-5-1 into 4-3-3 easy but never looks as good at home.
Thats why you think he is rubbish cos you never go away AFKA :) :)
I'm really struggling to see how Reid is going to fit into this, or get himself back up to match fitness[/quote]
I think reid will come in for one of our malfunctioning wingers..!
fUCK IT GO DOWN LET'S GO DOWN FIGHTING.
carson
young hh diawara thatcher
romm zz song reid (if fit)
bent and bent
We need a strong 4-4-2 where everyone knows their job and we give NOTHING away and spend 90 mins snapping and biting anything that moves.
This probably means Reid starting off the bench and maybe coming on for the last 30 mins for one of the wide men when there is a bit more space for him to operate.
As David Pleat said in the Grauniad after the Villa game, Pards is going to keep it simple and look for quick balls out of defence for the Bents to go OTT or into the channels and pressure the oppo in their own half, especially at home.
For the tougher away games (Everton etc..) he might tweak it a bit and play 4-5-1 but I think he will play it by ear as the results rollout.
My team....
Carson
Young - Elk - Herman - Thatcher
Rommedahl - Holland - Song - Thomas
Bent - Bent
Diawara and Boogy give stronger options.
carson
young diawarra bougy thatcher
ZZ holland faye/song JT/ried
Bent Bent
subs, randolph, rommers, lisbie, faye/somg (dependin on who starts), ambrose/reid (if he's not playin)
I can't see him playing 4-5-1 at home to start knowing, in his own words, that draws are not going to be enough.
Grinding out 'nought-noughts' would be Curbs' preferred tactic, perhaps?
It's risky and maybe a bit scary, but we need goals and a more cavalier approach is what Pards has in mind.
For me:
Carson
Young Bougy Diawara Thatcher
ZZ Song Holland Reidy
Bent Bent
Subs Rommadahl, Randolph, Lisbe, JFH, Ambrose, HH, JT ( i don't know how many subs your allowed.. 7 i think? ) And bring on Rommers to do some late damage, and probably JT because Reidy will fade