"I've seen that there's a lot of comments on the internet with regards to some video footage of me during the game.
I'm disappointed that people have leapt to the wrong conclusions about the context of what I was seen to be saying to Anton Ferdinand. I would never say such a thing, and I'm saddened that people would think so."
He must be even more ''saddened'' that the CPS don't believe his saintly protestation that he ''would never say such a thing''. If he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.
"I've seen that there's a lot of comments on the internet with regards to some video footage of me during the game.
I'm disappointed that people have leapt to the wrong conclusions about the context of what I was seen to be saying to Anton Ferdinand. I would never say such a thing, and I'm saddened that people would think so."
He must be even more ''saddened'' that the CPS don't believe his saintly protestation that he ''would never say such a thing''. If he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.
"I've seen that there's a lot of comments on the internet with regards to some video footage of me during the game.
I'm disappointed that people have leapt to the wrong conclusions about the context of what I was seen to be saying to Anton Ferdinand. I would never say such a thing, and I'm saddened that people would think so."
He must be even more ''saddened'' that the CPS don't believe his saintly protestation that he ''would never say such a thing''. If he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.
So he's guilty then?
Please read it propery : ''if he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.''
It's not hard; nothing to do with Uruguayan slang terms or anything like that; just basic English!
Anyone know what sort of punishment, sentence he could get if found guilty and what he he is being charged with?
talking and walking with intent to cause a riot, and using racially aggravated insulting language with intent to cause a breach of the peace ... if these are not already on the statute book, they soon will be .. maximum sentence ? ..... life with no parole
"I've seen that there's a lot of comments on the internet with regards to some video footage of me during the game.
I'm disappointed that people have leapt to the wrong conclusions about the context of what I was seen to be saying to Anton Ferdinand. I would never say such a thing, and I'm saddened that people would think so."
He must be even more ''saddened'' that the CPS don't believe his saintly protestation that he ''would never say such a thing''. If he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.
So he's guilty then?
Please read it propery : ''if he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.''
It's not hard; nothing to do with Uruguayan slang terms or anything like that; just basic English!
I most certainly did read it properly......I am guided by your tone when you said "his saintly protestations"....I'd say from that (A) You don't like him and (B) You either think he is or at the very least hope he is guilty.
Speaking for myself, I don't know one way or the other.
"I've seen that there's a lot of comments on the internet with regards to some video footage of me during the game.
I'm disappointed that people have leapt to the wrong conclusions about the context of what I was seen to be saying to Anton Ferdinand. I would never say such a thing, and I'm saddened that people would think so."
He must be even more ''saddened'' that the CPS don't believe his saintly protestation that he ''would never say such a thing''. If he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.
So he's guilty then?
Please read it propery : ''if he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.''
It's not hard; nothing to do with Uruguayan slang terms or anything like that; just basic English!
I most certainly did read it properly......I am guided by your tone when you said "his saintly protestations"....I'd say from that (A) You don't like him and (B) You either think he is or at the very least hope he is guilty.
I think you make inferences far too glibly. I don't ''hope'' for anything other than justice.
The CPS says there is sufficient evidence to prosecute and that there is a case to answer. The law will now take its course and my only ''hope'' is that Terry gets his just deserts. That means exoneration if he is innocent and zero tolerance if found guilty.
Nothing to do with this case, but I think it's because of the likes of Terry, Ashley Cole, Rooney, Rio Ferdinand, Defoe, Gerrard that some supporters have lost the passion for supporting England. All of them have been guilty of bad behaviour & in most cases on more than one occasion.
Its only going to a magistrates court and the offical line is that mgistrates (the same as judges) can not be biased and therefore can not be called into question.
Comments
I'm
disappointed that people have leapt to the wrong conclusions about the
context of what I was seen to be saying to Anton Ferdinand. I would
never say such a thing, and I'm saddened that people would think so."
He must be even more ''saddened'' that the CPS don't believe his saintly protestation that he ''would never say such a thing''. If he is found guilty, he will stand convicted both as a racist and a liar.
It's not hard; nothing to do with Uruguayan slang terms or anything like that; just basic English!
I most certainly did read it properly......I am guided by your tone when you said "his saintly protestations"....I'd say from that (A) You don't like him and (B) You either think he is or at the very least hope he is guilty.
Speaking for myself, I don't know one way or the other.
The CPS says there is sufficient evidence to prosecute and that there is a case to answer. The law will now take its course and my only ''hope'' is that Terry gets his just deserts. That means exoneration if he is innocent and zero tolerance if found guilty.
Total twat aswell
Poor John. It couldn't happen to a nicer bloke.
:-)
So so so looking forward to giving him a rousing welcome to WHL tomorrow night lol
He will either be found not guilty or it will all go out the window
I might be going tomoz and I will give him some myself
Its only going to a magistrates court and the offical line is that mgistrates (the same as judges) can not be biased and therefore can not be called into question.
British justice at its best!