Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

West Ham V Spurs & the Inside Woman.

Sorry can't seem to search otherwise I'd have resurrected one of the other Olympic Stadium threads but this story looks set to run and run. 

I haven't seen the pieces from yesterday's paper but read last week that a senior empoyee of OPLC was also working for West Ham during the time the bid was being prepared and in a relationship with the person the cheeky cockney geezers had tasked with submitting the bid. Rumoured that Spurs are going to push for a rerun of the process.

No conflict of interest there then.

Comments

  • Hmm, typical spammers!

    BTW I tried to search something yesterday and I don't think the facility works at all - it's going to mean quire a few new threads, methinks.

  • If you go to google and type in Charlton Life and the topic you can sometimes find threads there.

    Not ideal but if you are looking for something specific.
  • In view of the events over the weekend, Daniel Levy's demand for a Judicial Review of the entire bidding process seems like it's fully justified.

    Not that I want Spurs to move away from White Hart Lane, but there's an awful lot of money at stake here and the way it's been handled stinks to high heaven.

  • edited July 2011

    Why cant we just do what we told the whole world we would do when we bid for the Olympics?  The Olympic stadium at the size it is was to be temporary and should be reduced to the 25,000 capacity as planned retaining its athletics legacy. If that also involves a football club to get all round use out of it then Leyton Orient are the obvious benefactors of such a deal. They are an historic and local club and it is THEIR manor. Give Essex CCC the use of it for the 20/20 game in the summer.

    As much as I enjoyed our sojourn with the Premier League it is an exercise in pure greed and self interest, Why should Joe Public subsidise a self serving money making machine like THFC and give them even more of a leg up? They have their own plans for WHL and just because the local council wants them to pay over the odds for the privilege of planning permission they are squealing, well boo fuckin hoo!  As for West Ham,  I could quite happily see them feckers disappear off the face of the earth tbh, feck em and the dildo salesman who run em, we certainly dodged a bullet there. 

    Can we please for once stand up for what I thought this country is about. The Olympic Park and it's facilities should remain just that, a legacy for this country and for London and the South East in particular. FFS didn't Rogge state not too long ago that 85% of the sports that actually make up the bloody event, were either conceived, could be traced back to or were initially codified and organised on these islands of ours. 

    Spurs and West Ham can do one.

  • Why cant we just do what we told the whole world we would do when we bid for the Olympics?  The Olympic stadium at the size it is was to be temporary and should be reduced to the 25,000 capacity as planned retaining its athletics legacy. If that also involves a football club to get all round use out of it then Leyton Orient are the obvious benefactors of such a deal. They are an historic and local club and it is THEIR manor. Give Essex CCC the use of it for the 20/20 game in the summer.

    As much as I enjoyed our sojourn with the Premier League it is an exercise in pure greed and self interest, Why should Joe Public subsidise a self serving money making machine like THFC and give them even more of a leg up? They have their own plans for WHL and just because the local council wants them to pay over the odds for the privilege of planning permission they are squealing, well boo fuckin hoo!  As for West Ham,  I could quite happily see them feckers disappear off the face of the earth tbh, feck em and the dildo salesman who run em, we certainly dodged a bullet there. 

    Can we please for once stand up for what I thought this country is about. The Olympic Park and it's facilities should remain just that, a legacy for this country and for London and the South East in particular. FFS didn't Rogge state not too long ago that 85% of the sports that actually make up the bloody event, were either conceived, could be traced back to or were initially codified and organised on these islands of ours. 

    Spurs and West Ham can do one.

    Go Soapy!

    Yet one more reason (among many) that I'm glad myself and my family no longer pay LB Newham for the 'privilage' of living in the Olympic Borough.

  • Yet one more reason (among many) that I'm glad myself and my family no longer pay LB Newham for the 'privilage' of living in the Olympic Borough.

    I've had some dealings with Newham recently. I don't understand why the council loaned £40M of taxpayers' money to West Ham (a private company). Newham is one of the poorest boroughs in England. 
  • Votes, Jorge, votes!
  • Votes, Jorge, votes!
    I can understand the vote bit - I don't understand where the money came from in such a poor borough. 
  • Something stinks here big time.
  • I'm with soapy on this.

    The OPLC should have stuck to their guns and downgraded the stadium to an all-seater 25,000 purely for athletics after the games.

    If Spurs want a new stadium then the club should finance it themselves by whatever means.  I support the application for part public funding given the amount of regeneration it will give to N17 but the rest should come from the club itself by whatever means.

    Likewise, the OPLC should never have given it to West Ham.

    Something clearly stinks about this whole process and a full judicial review is the only way to get to the bottom of it.

    Personally, I'd be more happy if Levy was out trying to sign a bloody centre-forward who can score goals than the current crock of sh*t at the club but I can understand why he is taking further action.  He is taking a dangerous line but he's defending the clubs interests...and it certainly gives us more leverage for securing public funding for the NDP redevelopment.

    There's an interesting article which I've read somewhere which goes into a lot more depth than what I can comment on.  Will try and dig it out and will post it up here...
  • Sponsored links:


  • I don't undertsand why it had to be downgraded to 25,000 - why not design it so empty blocks can be covered with advertising so the extra capacity could be used for concerts etc... I'm sure live events would pay for its upkeep and the rest of the time it could be used for amateur/schools athletic compettions.
  • Yet one more reason (among many) that I'm glad myself and my family no longer pay LB Newham for the 'privilage' of living in the Olympic Borough.

    I've had some dealings with Newham recently. I don't understand why the council loaned £40M of taxpayers' money to West Ham (a private company). Newham is one of the poorest boroughs in England. 
    I think they have underwritten the loan not loaned it themselves, which, given WHU's financial postion looks like a high risk policy to me and it still cost a fortune to set the deal up anyway. I understand the Mayor of Newham is very keen on enjoying the hospitality of the Hammers quite a lot. I'll leave it at that.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!