Firstly apologies if this is deemed too political.
Right as you may or may not know I have been a retained Fire-fighter in Kent since I left college 18 years ago and have loved it until recently. They have severely changed our way of working, it is no longer flexible and we earn less for what we do, also they have sacked long standing watch members because they could not attain level 2 Literacy (A-C standard GCSE). So basically now very few appliances are on the run anymore and if you do live in Kent it might be of interest to you to find out more about your local station, especially what cover they give you. I am lucky as my lot have mostly managed to ride the storm and have only lost 25% of our number, we can just about maintain the levels of cover we always have.
This website is great as it also serves as a spleen spiller and agony Aunt. I feel better now, thanks for reading if you got past the first few lines that is.
Comments
How can they expect them to manage protests, deal with the Olympics, investigate mcains disappearance, deal with day to day crime, and still expect them to deal with a 20% lose of budget.
Didn't firemen have to pass basic literacy tests in the past then?
I'm shocked if that's the case. Sure, you don't need to be able to read just to point a hose at a fire, but there's a hell of a lot more to the job than that. I mean, how can you go into a burning building, etc, if you may not be able to read or understand importnant notices, etc when you're in there. Surely that change in itself has to be a good thing in the long-term cfgs? (though maybe not all in one go!)
gotta agree with this, if they couldn't attain level 2 literacy which is GCSE standard C and above, then that alone is a problem I think.....I always thought it was difficult to get into the brigade !.
I do though have the utmost respect for Firemen (and women) who do the job
In the nicest possible way, I'd have to agree with Off_It, if someone struggles with basic spelling I'd have to question their ability to do the job as well as someone who can spell.
On a positive note though, Bankers will get their pay rises and bonuses this year. I'm not a Banker by the way and have not had a pay rise for 3 years. I agree with March51.
I am afraid this is the way of the world at the moment and employers are looking for all sorts of ways to justify getting rid of staff.
We all know that money saved on the public sector is being used by the current government to prop up the economy and IMO with little long term thought as to the effects. I think that very slowly the general public will start to realise what they voted for but it's going to take a year or two before the penny drops and they can't have what they need (and used to get for the most part) when then need it like top rate emergency services.
For instance my wife and I have just spent a couple of months not knowing whether she would have a job left after a spending review in her workplace. She's a frontline worker in social services FYI and of the 30 people currently doing similar roles today only 11 will be left in a couple of months due to the spending cuts.
She and her collegues work bloody hard from the minute they start to the time they leave so I defy anyone to genuinely believe that there's not going to be a significant reduction in service as a result of the 19 posts going. Even if you believe Mr Pickles b####x about wastage in the public sector there's no way they are overstaffed to that extent.
It's not a great time to be in the public sector or if you are a service user expect to maintain the same level of service you used to get.
Local authorities still seem to be recruiting "Sustainability Officers" and other "Green" posts despite cutting front line services.
Anyone know why that is?
I think you might "give a stuff" if you have a house fire or are trapped in a vehicle after an accident.
One hopes never to need to use the emergency services but it is essential to have them in case. A bit like car and house insurance.
I beg to differ.
People are very concerned about losses of and reductions to essential services. The problem is that they don't always know how or where to effectively articulate that concern.
Our politicians and public servants surround themselves with immunity clauses not available to those outside the "bubble" and so the incompetence and mismanagement continues.
Valleyaddick doesn't appear to have read the thread probably in that cfgs is talking about RETAINED fire fighters.
That means that being a fireman IS his second job and in his area no retained fire service probably means no fire service at all!
Sorry I cannot edit.
I meant MrOneLung not valleyaddick.