Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

North v South london

Can any explain why the north side of the river thames has more success on the pitch than the south side? Would Arsenal be as good if they were still from woolwich?

Comments

  • No idea - but North London is just wrong.
  • North Londoners have webbed feet, a rare genetic trait that is otherwise useless but it does help them play football better.

  • Could it be that they have more of the tube?
  • Moved north of the river 15 years ago and I have to say it's miles better.

    *Runs for cover*

  • the money is all north of the river.
  • North London is shite and boring.  South London has much more character.

  • Born and bred in South London but now work in North London. -  Neasden , Wood Green , Stonebridge Park , Finsbury park . Nuke the lot of em.
  • dont know about u but your old man for taking you and your brother all them years ago is a legend, amazing how a opinion changes when you know the poster. Remember Newcastle away  april 87
  • 'Character'? Ha ha! Yeah, it's certainly got 'character'.
  • Shouldnt it be dive for cover Uboat and mind those depth charges!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Talking of 'dives' South London also has inferior pubs.

    Admit it, everyone.

  • edited May 2011
    North v South London? Short of ideas at Time Out again?

    We all know West London's the real toilet in this city, anyway.

    (There was a "what if?" thread a few months back about what might have happened if Arsenal stayed in Plumstead, btw.)
  • Some great areas of North London, some very very rubbish ones.

    Think there's certainly more of a "buzz" in South London nowadays though. North London had it's time, South London is beginning to blossom.
  • THE ONLY WAY IS DEPTFORD!
  • North London ?  never herd of it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!