Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Harriott and Osborne to be offered pro deals

edited April 2011 in General Charlton
Addicks duo offered deals

Friday, 08 April 2011

By Richard Cawley

CHARLTON are handing professional deals to a couple of their most promising youngsters.

Norbury-raised winger Callum Harriett and defender Harry Osborne, both 17, have been offered contracts.

Harriett, who joined the Addicks at the age of nine and has been an unused substitute recently, has been handed a two-year deal.

Get today's South London Press for the latest Charlton news.

Follow me on Twitter - @RichCawleySLP.
http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/Sport.cfm?id=13330&headline=Addicks

Good news, along with Cousins that should be 3 u18 first years turning pro early.

Wonder if any of them will make the bench this season. Perhaps Harriott if Powell plans on letting Reid go.
«1

Comments

  • If they are good as we hope wouldn't longer deals be better or are we just not in the position to offer any players deals over 2 years?
  • Good news - Osborne looks superb whenever I've seen him play. He and Cousins work well together

    A very promising centre back

    As for Harriott - he's a carbon copy of Kyel Reid ( just hopefully more committed to the clubs cause than his wallet). Short, very fast, very direct, fairly strong and a left foot like a traction engine
  • [cite]Posted By: Swisdom[/cite]Good news - Osborne looks superb whenever I've seen him play. He and Cousins work well together

    A very promising centre back

    As for Harriott - he's a carbon copy of Kyel Reid ( just hopefully more committed to the clubs cause than his wallet). Short, very fast, very direct, fairly strong and a left foot like a traction engine

    Sounds promising but handbook says that while Osbourne was born in greenwich he now lives in South Norwood.

    Not for me to decide but if it was these are the sort of players I like to see CL sponsoring next season.

    Good luck to them both in any case.
  • [cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]
    Sounds promising but handbook says that while Osbourne was born in greenwich he now lives in South Norwood.

    Not for me to decide but if it was these are the sort of players I like to see CL sponsoring next season.

    Ha ha, Henry ......I expect Osbourne still lives with his Mum.
  • [cite]Posted By: Oggy Red[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]
    Sounds promising but handbook says that while Osbourne was born in greenwich he now lives in South Norwood.

    Not for me to decide but if it was these are the sort of players I like to see CL sponsoring next season.

    Ha ha, Henry ......I expect Osbourne still lives with his Mum.

    With the millions thousands he'll be earning as a pro he can afford to buy rent her a place in a nicer area

    The scary thing is that both were born in 1994 ie long after we came back to the Valley.

    Hope they, and Cousins, get a game off the bench either this season or in the JPT/league cup next term.
  • good to see that Harriott has been handed a 2 year deal. Part of the problem with Jenkinson is that last summer we only deemed him good enough of a 1 year deal and look where that has left us. From what I've seen of Harriott he's going to be far better than Reid.
  • [cite]Posted By: LargeAddick[/cite]good to see that Harriott has been handed a 2 year deal. Part of the problem with Jenkinson is that last summer we only deemed him good enough of a 1 year deal and look where that has left us. From what I've seen of Harriott he's going to be far better than Reid.

    Glad to hear about Harriot, shame we were never in a position to give him run outs when he was on the bench earlier in the season, even though CP said he was not ready, if we had been in a position with a lead of sorts it would have been good to see him get 5 /10 minutes. Lets hope now we are neither going up nor down, the Yoof can get a few cameo minutes. He is tiny though, along with Solly you wonder if we are feeding them properly at Sparrows lane or maybe Mambo is first in line as he is huge.
  • yes but Mambo is pants.
  • [cite]Posted By: LargeAddick[/cite]yes but Mambo is pants.

    Well he would be if he is eating the other players food, stands to reason!!
  • We do seem to specialise in producing lightweight midgets by and large.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Mambo may have played pants in games butI have seen some very promising performances from him.
  • [cite]Posted By: MuttleyCAFC[/cite]Mambo may have played pants in games butI have seen some very promising performances from him.
    Be interesting to see if he's kept on. I'm guessing he won't be with both Fortune making the bench ahead of him, even though he is most likely going to be released.
  • The most satisfying thing for me is that the Club have recognised the need to work hard to keep our promising youngsters who are our future.
  • [cite]Posted By: Kap10[/cite]Glad to hear about Harriot......he is tiny though, along with Solly you wonder if we are feeding them properly at Sparrows lane

    Harriott is only just 17 .........but 5'5".
    Probably still growing, so a good reason that Powell won't consider him as anywhere near the 1st team yet.

    Time to feed him raw steak?
  • [cite]Posted By: LenGlover[/cite]We do seem to specialise in producing lightweight midgets by and large.

    Large is not a lightweight midget. Otherwise he'd be an oxymoron.

    ;o)
  • [cite]Posted By: Oggy Red[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Kap10[/cite]Glad to hear about Harriot......he is tiny though, along with Solly you wonder if we are feeding them properly at Sparrows lane

    Harriott is only just 17 .........but 5'5".
    Probably still growing, so a good reason that Powell won't consider him as anywhere near the 1st team yet.

    Time to feed him raw steak?

    How tall is lennon?? Messi?? - if he has the ability and is quick enough both with his feet and head size doesnt matter, low centre of gravity n all that quicker to react/turn etc
  • Oh, it does matter, Scruffle ........ if he's still growing, he hasn't yet an adult body.
    Ask any sports physio or specialist, he would be likely to be injury prone all his career - and possibly forced to retire early.

    Different for a big lad of the same age who's already got a relatively mature physique.
    Somebody like Jonjo Shelvey, for instance who was physically able to cope with the adult game at 16/17.

    Harriott will be allowed to come through when he's physically ready.
  • [cite]Posted By: Oggy Red[/cite]Oh, it does matter, Scruffle ........ if he's still growing, he hasn't yet an adult body.
    Ask any sports physio or specialist, he would be likely to be injury prone all his career - and possibly forced to retire early.

    Different for a big lad of the same age who's already got a relatively mature physique.
    Somebody like Jonjo Shelvey, for instance who was physically able to cope with the adult game at 16/17.

    Harriott will be allowed to come through when he's physically ready.
    Agree. No surprise Mambo was the first u18 last season to go out on a "work experience" loan, from what I can remember.

    But yes if you're good enough height won't be a problem for an attacking player. Xavi, Iniesta, Messi, Scholes Sneijder etc all small but very good players at the top level. There are plenty more further down the leagues, even though the Champ and League 1 are considered physical. Just need enough strengths to their game to make up for a lack of height/strength.
  • [cite]Posted By: Oggy Red[/cite]Oh, it does matter, Scruffle ........ if he's still growing, he hasn't yet an adult body.
    Ask any sports physio or specialist, he would be likely to be injury prone all his career - and possibly forced to retire early.

    Different for a big lad of the same age who's already got a relatively mature physique.
    Somebody like Jonjo Shelvey, for instance who was physically able to cope with the adult game at 16/17.

    Harriott will be allowed to come through when he's physically ready.

    but what if he is fully developed?? there's not much more growth after 17?? Ive not grown since I was 15, alhtouh I was over 6 foot by the age of 13 and only got to the dizzy heights of 6"2

    Just pointing out that just because he's small doesnt mean he's not gonna make it or that its a massive massive disadvantage - we just have to play to his strwenghts which will no doubt be ball on the deck and not pumped up to him.
  • Might be worth Powell having a look at Mambo again in one or two of the meaningless games remaining - just to be sure he isn't worth keeping.
  • Sponsored links:


  • [cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]but what if he is fully developed?? there's not much more growth after 17?? Ive not grown since I was 15, alhtouh I was over 6 foot by the age of 13 and only got to the dizzy heights of 6"2

    Just pointing out that just because he's small doesnt mean he's not gonna make it or that its a massive massive disadvantage - we just have to play to his strwenghts which will no doubt be ball on the deck and not pumped up to him.
    It's not just about the physical side, it's the mental side of it as well. See Wagstaff's loss of confidence after Pardew played him too early and then dropped him.

    I'm sure he'll be involved pre-season and that'll be an interesting test for him.
  • [cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]but what if he is fully developed?? there's not much more growth after 17?? Ive not grown since I was 15, alhtouh I was over 6 foot by the age of 13 and only got to the dizzy heights of 6"2

    Exactly my point with Jonjo, Scruffle.
    As with Jonjo, your body was more or less fully grown at an early age.

    If you had been a young pro footballer, you may have been deemed physically ready for the adult game at 17.


    Lots of kids develop later; even at 18 or 19 they are still growing.
    Another year could make a big difference for Harriott, and he'll come through when he's ready.

    He's already been named on the 1st team bench (and given a 2-year contract on his 17th birthday).
    That tells you he is very highly regarded by the Charlton management.

    Expect him to feature in pre-season friendlies - and maybe even a 10 minute cameo in a League game this season,
    to give him a taste and valuable experience.
  • [cite]Posted By: Scoham[/cite]It's not just about the physical side, it's the mental side of it as well. See Wagstaff's loss of confidence after Pardew played him too early and then dropped him.

    Very good point, Scoham.

    Waggy was wiped out for a year by being played before he was ready.
  • Brilliant, McLovin!!
  • [cite]Posted By: Scoham[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]but what if he is fully developed?? there's not much more growth after 17?? Ive not grown since I was 15, alhtouh I was over 6 foot by the age of 13 and only got to the dizzy heights of 6"2

    Just pointing out that just because he's small doesnt mean he's not gonna make it or that its a massive massive disadvantage - we just have to play to his strwenghts which will no doubt be ball on the deck and not pumped up to him.
    It's not just about the physical side, it's the mental side of it as well. See Wagstaff's loss of confidence after Pardew played him too early and then dropped him.

    I'm sure he'll be involved pre-season and that'll be an interesting test for him.
    I always think that in England we're too keen to squeeze the most from young players. SAF was actually pretty sparing with a lot of the Fergie Fledglings and the long careers of Giggs, Scholes and Beckham seem to suggest that is a pretty good thing. I always remember Del Peiro coming onto Football Italia in a blaze of glory, getting a brace and then being rested for ages. At the time I thought it was mad, but he played well into his late 30s. Compare it to the way Houlier forced Michael Owen to go 90 minutes in meaningless league cup games that they were winning comfortably. It's no surprise to me that Owen ended up being a bit of a burnout who's career was completely interrupted by injury. The vast majority of people are still going through physical development into their early 20s. Look at the likes of Roy Keane who looked a bit skinny when he started at Forest (having been rejected by a number of clubs for being too small) before evolving into a mobile brick shithouse. Or Peter Crouch who was like an akward colt when he was coming through and... hang on that one doesn't work.
  • Scott Parker was so talented at 13, that he performed keepy-uppies in a McDonalds TV commercial.

    Curbs thought so too, and gave Parker a cameo run out as a late sub a few weeks before his 17th birthday.
    Apart from a handful of very occasional appearances, we never saw him again for 3 years.

    Then he made his mark in style.
  • You can't expect too much from a 17 year old nor should you - there are the odd exceptions- Giggs- Rooney but they aren't going to win you things now but hopefully they will in the future. What would be good for us is that Harriot and others can be a useful part of the squad next season.
  • [cite]Posted By: Scoham[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: MuttleyCAFC[/cite]Mambo may have played pants in games butI have seen some very promising performances from him.
    Be interesting to see if he's kept on. I'm guessing he won't be with both Fortune making the bench ahead of him, even though he is most likely going to be released.

    Sorry Scoham, but I feel that your guess will be totally wrong here. I think he will be offered a new deal.
  • [cite]Posted By: PaulCAFC[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Scoham[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: MuttleyCAFC[/cite]Mambo may have played pants in games butI have seen some very promising performances from him.
    Be interesting to see if he's kept on. I'm guessing he won't be with both Fortune making the bench ahead of him, even though he is most likely going to be released.

    Sorry Scoham, but I feel that your guess will be totally wrong here. I think he will be offered a new deal.

    from what I've seen I hope he won't.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!