Please can we stop all this nonsense about "Sir Chris". I see even the official site is getting on the act with it now. I used to find the odd Sir Alan and Sir Clive comment irksome, but the overuse of Sir in the last couple of days is really doing my head in. There's only one Sir and that's Sir Maurice.
0
Comments
I think you do an injustice, sir!
What about Sir Henry Irving?
Now that's proper, Charlton.
Right, Henry?
Health and safety political correctness gawn mad i tell thee ;-)
I'm with you mate, it's vomit inducing.
I agree, it's sad and disrespectful to those that have actually earned it.
To have some fans do it is sad enough, but for the club to 'give' one of it's employees a knighthood is just ridiculous.
Did you never call your school teachers Sir?
Totally agree. It is disrespectful to such honourable Knights of the realm and upstanding pillars of British society as Sir Fred Goodwin and the like.
Shame on us.
Did you never call your school teachers Sir?[/quote]
No.
Neither has Chris Powell.
However, I'm pretty clear which of these two deserves to be.
And that was the derivation of the name, I think. I'm pretty sure it started as 'Gentleman Chris' or 'fotball's top gent' or some such. Which let's be honest, sounds bloody stupid. So it became 'Sir Chris'.
Really can't see why anyone has a problem with that.
Do you also object to King Kenny, as a gross insult to the Windsors and the Kongs ?
Neither has Chris Powell.
However, I'm pretty clear which of these two deserves to be.[/quote]
True, but he has the title as an inheritance from his father as a baronet.
The Kongs - pmsl - fantastic
Mr Meldrew to you sonny
Sir Victor, please.