Yes, he has only managed Newcastle for one game BUT as coaching experience goes, he has it in abundance. After all, he served as Mourinho's and Avram Grant's right-hand man and that deserves an accolade for tolerance and patience alone, quite aside from being part of the set-up that took Chelsea to their first two PL titles in fifty years, and to within a few inches of a Champions League triumph in Moscow (those few inches being the woodwork, obviously).
Yes, his record was somewhat slightly blemished last season at West Ham but that could be put down to off-field shenanigans and the players (as can be seen replicated under Grant at Upton Park season).
The only stumbling block could be wages/pay, but he is out of work and he wouldn't need to relocate a million miles away.
Otherwise, I hear on some authority that the board are said to be considering Peter Taylor- but given that he hasn't exactly been an emphatic success at Bradford this season (they lie 10th), gven his Palarse credentials (as a former player and one of the hilariously shit, over-hyped managers there), and let's not forget his first shocking season at Hull, and the way that Leicester imploded and went from title-challengers to relegation certainties in a few months, I would rather tell him to foxtrot oscar.
0
Comments
I struggle to accredit too much to Clarke for Chelsea's success considering they quite possibly had the best manager and most money in the world at the time.
Taylor - no!
Clarke - Manager
Wilkins - Coach ???
Unlikely though as i doubt we could afford either salary.
Ideally i'd like to avoid all Palace ties to managers so that the fans will give the new guy a chance.
People may say 'yeah, but he won at the League One play-off final at Wembley with Gillingham'. But any pikey will tell you that was because he inherited a brilliant squad from their previous manager (Pulis?).
Please not the relegation usher, Wilkins - he's been a disaster everywhere other than Chelsea because the team always picked itself.
Wilkins - Coach ???'
As you said Madz- we could never afford both, so out of the question. As for the 'avoiding Palace ties..' etc, well, we gave Pardew a chance (although yes he played for us too)? And to be honest, it was only when the results went against us AND we could see Dowie making less-than-astute signings that we started to get pissed off with Earthworm Jim. My objections to Peter Taylor are more to do with his track record, but are compounded by his Palace connections.
And Grant couldn't re-employ him because he already had decided to walk away from his post at West Ham.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/west_ham/article7061264.ece
Interesting quote from Mourinho
“[This is what I think about Steve Clarke: if, at this moment, he had the chance to manage a club, even a big club like Chelsea, he would be ready for that. He is that good.” — Jose Mourinho
Good experience after playing as well, and only 47.
Maybe he is the one?
Neither does he know anything about football outside the prem.
Big no - same as a lot of names mentioned.
The successes in this league have been people like lambert, grayson, adkins (with scunthorpe), poyet and jackett
people from the lower leagues - anyhting ex prem would be a disaster
All of those didn't know any about the lower leagues until they started. It's still the same game in the Premiership as it is in League 1.
It's like saying we wouldn't want Mourinho as manager because he doesn't know anything about lower league football.
There are bound to be a few exceptions, but generally speaking.
We should manage to avoid that, tbh I can't see Pardew leaving Newcastle.....