You were watching a different game to me. He was nowhere near as effective as he could have been with better players around him. However, his touch and movement was ( as previously stated ) in a different league.
Ben Swallows. I thought he looked very useful indeed. He had lovely quick feet and was comfortable on the ball. Faded towards the end though - but then again so did many of their players
...and didn't give his full back an ounce of decent cover when Wagstaff had four or five 1st half chances to cross. Made Kyle Reid look like John Robinson.
Thought he looked ok, nothing special. There was a moment in first half when the ball went out for a throw on the left and I thought he could easily have made it and kept the ball in. Lazy, one footed and no defensive discipline.
...and didn't give his full back an ounce of decent cover when Wagstaff had four or five 1st half chances to cross. Made Kyle Reid look like John Robinson.
Ha Ha - you have got to be kidding. I have just realised why a lot of people thought Lloyd Sam was good. Someone else said there was a moment in the first half when the ball went out and he probably could have stopped it. JESUS !!!!!! You lot need to get out of The Oak a lot earlier.
Mind you, there was a moment last night when Wagstaff could have got in a decent cross, but he didn't. Actually, 4 or 5 times........
[cite]Posted By: masicat[/cite]...and didn't give his full back an ounce of decent cover when Wagstaff had four or five 1st half chances to cross. Made Kyle Reid look like John Robinson.
Ha Ha - you have got to be kidding. I have just realised why a lot of people thought Lloyd Sam was good. Someone else said there was a moment in the first half when the ball went out and he probably could have stopped it. JESUS !!!!!! You lot need to get out of The Oak a lot earlier.
Mind you, there was a moment last night when Wagstaff could have got in a decent cross, but he didn't. Actually, 4 or 5 times........
Wingers have to help their full backs in a 4-4-2. If they don't, they're not very good wingers.
Comments
Their 'keeper WAS a class above the rest last night.
I'd hate to have a name like that.
;o)
Ha Ha - you have got to be kidding. I have just realised why a lot of people thought Lloyd Sam was good. Someone else said there was a moment in the first half when the ball went out and he probably could have stopped it. JESUS !!!!!! You lot need to get out of The Oak a lot earlier.
Mind you, there was a moment last night when Wagstaff could have got in a decent cross, but he didn't. Actually, 4 or 5 times........
Wingers have to help their full backs in a 4-4-2. If they don't, they're not very good wingers.
Their keeper, however, should not be playing division 3 - he was fantastic.