STATBANK - Post Swindon Away

AFKABartram

PLAYER RATINGS

Elliot - 7.78
Francis - 7.22
Fry - 7.67
Dailly - 7.61
Doherty - 7.39
Wagstaff - 7.83
Semedo - 8.28
Racon - 8.00
Jackson - 8.00
Benson - 7.83
Anyinsah - 8.83

Ave rating - 7.86 (Highest ave rating since Tranmere A last season)

MOM - ANYINSAH (8.83 - Highest individual rating since Lloyd Sam at Tranmere A last season)

AVERAGE PLAYER RATINGS (After 15 games)

Ayinsah - 7.57 - 5
Elliot - 6.66 - 11
Reid - 6.65 - 9
Dailly - 6.60 - 8
Fry - 6.57 - 7
Wagstaff - 6.53 - 13
Racon - 6.53 - 13
Martin - 6.35 - 11
Benson - 6.35 - 11
Jackson - 6.34 - 14
Semedo - 6.34 - 13
Doherty - 6.30 - 15
Abbott - 6.15 - 9
McCormack - 6.14 - 6
Francis - 5.98 - 12
Llera - 5.90 - 5

Less than 5 apps....

Fortune - 6.10 - 4
Worner - 6.81 - 4
Sodje - 6.07 - 3
Solly - 7.87 - 1

MATCH RATINGS

...........................STFC........CAFC

Goals...................... 0.............3
Possession................41%..........59%
Shots (target).............3.............4
Shots (off-target)….......9.............1
Corners....................10............7
Fouls........................7............11
Yellow cards................1.............0

1ST CLEAN SHEET AWAY FROM HOME THIS SEASON

1ST TIME WON 3 GAMES IN A ROW SINCE DEC 12 2009

For a more extensive Statbank after 14 games, CLICK HERE

Exiled_Addick

Bloody hell that was quick AFKA! You wait 14 games for an update and then you get 2 at once! Am I sensing you find it a bit easier to muster enthusiasm for these when we'er winning? ;-)

I know you probably have some kind of official source for your match stats but I'm pretty sure that shots n target figure is wrong - their keeper made at least two saves in the first half and we scored 3, so we must have hit the target at least 5 times. Pretty sure we had more than just those two shots saved/blocked too.

Henry Irving

Excellent. Nobody tell Threadkiller or Oohaah that Robbie's average in 6.66!!!

Other stats. Top away scorers in the division are now Charlton Athletic (15) Hudds and Swindon have 13 each.

Lowest home scorers in the division are Sheff Weds (5) just ahead of Bristol Rovers and Charlton both on 7.

AFKABartram

[cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]Bloody hell that was quick AFKA! You wait 14 games for an update and then you get 2 at once! Am I sensing you find it a bit easier to muster enthusiasm for these when we'er winning? ;-)

LOL, last one from me for the time being so just wanted to make sure everything was fully up to date before passing the reigns and the spreadsheets over to some other poor sod Lancashire Lad

lancashire lad

no pressure then!

Stone

[cite]Posted By: lancashire lad[/cite]no pressure then!

Someone getting the starting 11 correct would be an improvement!

Dazzler21

stone you bitch lol

AFKABartram

[cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]
I know you probably have some kind of official source for your match stats but I'm pretty sure that shots n target figure is wrong - their keeper made at least two saves in the first half and we scored 3, so we must have hit the target at least 5 times. Pretty sure we had more than just those two shots saved/blocked too.

These i think are official Football League stats, which once the new official site moves over to the generic site you'll be seeing a lot more prominently. To be honest, i've never taken them as gospel and questioned myself a few times how accurate they are. But there is nothing else out there to work off, so its the best we're going to get.

Exiled_Addick

Fair enough AFKA, I suspected as much and wasn't trying to call you out - more just make other lifers aware as that stat suggests we were a bit lucky to come away with three goals, when we were actually creating a lot more chances than that stat suggests.

dabos

[cite]Posted By: AFKABartram[/cite]

[cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]
I know you probably have some kind of official source for your match stats but I'm pretty sure that shots n target figure is wrong - their keeper made at least two saves in the first half and we scored 3, so we must have hit the target at least 5 times. Pretty sure we had more than just those two shots saved/blocked too.

These i think are official Football League stats, which once the new official site moves over to the generic site you'll be seeing a lot more prominently. To be honest, i've never taken them as gospel and questioned myself a few times how accurate they are. But there is nothing else out there to work off, so its the best we're going to get.

I have a very concrete example of what you're saying:

Brentford 1 Bournemouth 1

Unless penalties don't contribute towards shots on target, then Brentford clearly had more than 0 shots on target based on the video footage of the game.

Scoham

[cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]

[cite]Posted By: AFKABartram[/cite]

[cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]
I know you probably have some kind of official source for your match stats but I'm pretty sure that shots n target figure is wrong - their keeper made at least two saves in the first half and we scored 3, so we must have hit the target at least 5 times. Pretty sure we had more than just those two shots saved/blocked too.

These i think are official Football League stats, which once the new official site moves over to the generic site you'll be seeing a lot more prominently. To be honest, i've never taken them as gospel and questioned myself a few times how accurate they are. But there is nothing else out there to work off, so its the best we're going to get.

I have a very concrete example of what you're saying:

Brentford 1 Bournemouth 1

Unless penalties don't contribute towards shots on target, then Brentford clearly had more than 0 shots on target based on the video footage of the game.

The FL site also gave Abbott an assist in the Orient game, when it was Martin who set up Wagstaff for his goal.

LoOkOuT

I love Stabank. Maybe there's some way to systematically harness the input of those that were there to correct the FL stats. Maybe a review committee.

johnnybev1987

Love statbank cheers AFKA, always been my favourate thing on here by far....even better then my poker ones lol

Bet your glad to get that of your hands :P good luck lancashire lad we expect nothing less then the best just to pre-warn you!